Minecraft Wiki

除另有声明,转载时均必须注明出处若簡繁轉換出錯,請以遊戲內為準请勇于扩充与修正内容有兴趣逛逛我们的微博沟通交流,欢迎到社区专页需要协助,请在告示板留言

了解更多

Minecraft Wiki
Advertisement

Bot request

Hello ! I'm sorry, I don't speak your language, but I'm an, and I made a bot called. This bot works on interwiki links in random pages. It is already running on the French and English wikis (contributions : /). I have tested it on these 2 wikis, and now I think that it is ready to work on all the Minecraft Wikis.
Can a bureaucrat put the bot flag to this user ?
Thanks ! • ObelusPA2 d · FR Admin · 2014年11月9日 (日) 14:22 (UTC)

As a request like this, you'd better post that on admin notice board. a20001017留言 2014年11月12日 (三) 03:33 (UTC)

树莓派版正式终止更新

由于树莓派版已被官方确认不会再更新和不再被支持(见),我认为应该删除wiki里一些树莓派版的页面,树莓派版版本记录应被删除,因为它只有两个版本,第一个版本就是加入很多东西,这些资讯能搬到树莓派版页面里,第二个版本就是漏洞修复。而其它页面里历史段落里树莓派版的资讯也应被删除,因为它们只是同一个版本并只是「加入XXX。」,没有保留的需要。

以下是我的建议:

删除:树莓派版版本记录树莓派版独有特性树莓派版未来展望Template:Pi EditionTemplate:Pi 、历史段落的树莓派版部分
保留:树莓派版

请提供意见。--ALWAYSFF讨论·贡献 2016年2月11日 (四) 07:24 (UTC)

保持和en同步就好了吧 - Ricochet☎留言 2016年2月11日 (四) 10:03 (UTC)
我的建议就是和en一样,我只是问问有没有人有意见,因为一直有人在我删除后加回来。ALWAYSFF讨论·贡献 2016年2月11日 (四) 10:16 (UTC)
加回去其实是因为有许多页面含有你所要删除的页面的引用,还没来得及删除这些引用,为防止红链,所以就加回去了。135ty· 2016年2月11日 (四) 13:34 (UTC)
不要先移除模板里的,等全部的页面都清理完毕再清除模板里的树莓派版a20001017Talk! 2016年2月11日 (四) 13:40 (UTC)
历史模板方面我明白了,但为什么要加回Module:Version/Numbers呢?首页的树莓派版在我移除Module:Version/Numbers的树莓派版之前已经移除了。--ALWAYSFF讨论·贡献 2016年2月13日 (六) 03:12 (UTC)
不要删除,树莓派版,它可以保留一些纪念。假如Minecraft Wiki被删了,你还要把关于它的资料删一大半?–该未签名留言由WikiPickaxe讨论贡献)在2016年8月18日 (四) 07:35 (UTC) 添加。请在您的回复后面加上 ~~~~
你这话就不好听了-Ff98sha讨论) 2016年8月18日 (四) 07:59 (UTC)
删除的只是树莓派版独有特性、未来展望、Template:Pi Edition、Template:Pi和历史段落的树莓派版部分,树莓派版仍然留存于Minecraft Wiki上,你所说的保留纪念意义还在。135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月18日 (四) 08:41 (UTC)

New admin requests / 新的管理请求

I received a request from someone asking for new admins to be appointed due to lack of activity from the current ones here. Since I am not familiar with this community, I can't judge if the suggested users are the most appropriate choices for becoming new admins. Please make a decision on what needs to be done, and email me when you are ready for new admins to be appointed. I will leave a copy of the email below:

Google translate: 我收到有人要求新管理员被任命由于从这里目前那些缺乏活动的请求。由于我不熟悉这个社会,我不能,如果建议用户对于新成为管理员最合适的选择判断。请上需要做什么样的决定,和给我发电子邮件当你准备好被任命为新的管理员。我将离开下面的电子邮件的副本:

Human translate: 我收到有人以现任管理员缺乏活动而要求任命新的管理员。由于我不熟悉这个社区,我无法判断受提名用户是否合适被任命为新管理员。请决定需要采取什么措施,如果你准备好被任命的话,请发邮件给我。我会在下面留下邮件的副本:

Dear Curse

I write this letter to complain something about Chinese Minecraft Wiki.

I want to complain about the administration team.The bureaucrat,Craft Lawrence,seems to be inactive.In year 2016,he only has 19 edits.In Chinese wiki QQ talkgroup,he seldom speaks,too.Otherwise,he is not in the same timezone with us(for he is in Canada).

Next,about the administrators.Hzy98051210/Hzy980512(they are the same one) only has 6 edits in 2016.he has been inactive since 2014 summer.Another one,Sjjklh,4 edits.And they hardly talks in the talkgroup.As I think,the administration team need active contributors,but not honorable inactive users.Powup333 is the most active one among the administration team.

So,here is my suggestion:Make Powup333 the bureaucrat,dismiss Craft Lawrence,Hzy98051210 and Sjjklh.Promote some active users,like 135ty,ALWAYSFF,Ff98sha and A20001017,they are all in the Active users list and also have high wikipoints.Chinese Minecraft Wiki has few people editing,maybe a new administration team will make it better.

Anonymous

--Majr讨论) 2016年6月3日 (五) 14:20 (UTC)

 I disagree on discharging Craft Lawrence, Sjjklh. CL has the top English skill among all active translators so he should remain being bureaucrat. On the other hand, Sjjklh is doing well on calling on more editors joining us. In fact, the number of articals has tripled comparing with the number on 22 June, 2014.‎ However, the search interest index of the keyword 'minecraft', I'm sorry to say, has droped quite much according to the statistics from Baidu Index. So it's untenable to say that Chinese Minecraft Wiki has few people editing. Anyway, the request has been mentioned by CL in Wiki QQ talkgroup which the complainer mentioned earlier. I think we will have a result tomorrow (CST, GMT+8). a20001017Talk! 2016年6月4日 (六) 12:22 (UTC)


Again I have received an email requesting new admins. I do not know why this user does not just ask here rather than e-mailing me about it, since I can't do anything about it other than forward what they said:

Dear Majr,

Hi! I am an active user in Chinese Minecraft Wiki. Recently, I and some other users have some complaints about our administration team.

Craft_Lawrence is one of the bureaucrats. He is inactive and he rarely edits recently. Although he was very active in the past and contributed a lot, now he is not doing work that a bureaucrat should.

Powup333 is the other bureaucrat. He is not very active, but better than Craft_Lawrence. Powup333 is very important to us because of his extensive experience of this wiki and the ability of writing Modules. He can also do things that normal administrators can't do.

Among the administrators, some admins, such as Hzy980512 and Sjjklh, are inactive. Hzy980512 has low contributions to our wiki and is inactive. He also didn't do his admin work. Although Sjjklh contributed a lot, and is a senior member of our wiki, he is now inactive and also didn't do his admin work.

Another admin, 135ty, is very active and hard-working. His contribution in our wiki is larger than Powup333. Thus, should be promoted.

Recently, an IP spammed like 40 times in the same page and only two admins - A20001017 and 135ty, and two other users reacted fast enough to stop him.

In my opinion, admins and bureaucrats should be active users who is contributing a lot and/or familiar with advanced functions, but not users who have large contributions in the past but inactive nowadays.

I hope this can be discussed in the Community Portal but not only voted in our talkgroup, which also has many inactive users, like last time.

Anonymous


Human translation:


亲爱的Majr,

你好!我是中文Minecraft Wiki的一位活跃用户。最近我们和对中文Minecraft Wiki的管理制度有点意见。

我们的行政员是Powup333和Craft_Lawrence。但是Craft_Lawrence很不活跃,很长时间都没有看到他做一次更改。虽然他以前很活跃,贡献巨大,但现在,他没有做到一个行政员该做的。

同样Powup333活跃度也比较低,但相比之下他的活跃度稍微高一点。他的作用也很重要,经验丰富,很擅长模板编辑,还处理管理员无法处理的事情。

我们的管理员中,也有一些用户很不活跃。如Hzy980512和Sjjklh。其中Hzy980512的贡献相比较小,活跃度极低,没有尽到管理员的责任。Sjjklh虽然贡献极大,是中文Minecraft Wiki的元老,但现在也十分不活跃,也没有尽到管理员的责任。

我们的管理员135ty十分活跃,刻苦努力,为中文Minecraft Wiki的贡献甚至超过了行政员Powup333,应该升职为行政员。

最近,有一个IP在同一个页面破坏了40次,然而只有两个管理员 - A20001017和 135ty,以及另外两个用户反应迅速来阻止这种行为。

我认为,管理员和行政员是留给贡献多的,对Minecraft Wiki里一些深层功能熟悉或者活跃度较高的用户的,而不是留给曾经是贡献极大的伟大但现在不活跃的用户的。

我希望能在社区专页里进行讨论,而不是像上次那样在也有很多不活跃用户的讨论组里讨论。

Anonymous

Majr讨论) 2016年8月30日 (二) 08:09 (UTC)

 I disagree on discharging Craft Lawrence, Sjjklh and Hzy980512. As a20001017 said, CL has the top English skill among all active translators so he should remain being bureaucrat. On the other hand, Sjjklh is doing well on calling on more editors joining us. Hzy980512 is also familiar with advanced function of Minecraft Wiki. He will be active before long. Thus, there is no reason to discharge Craft Lawrence, Sjjklh and Hzy980512.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月30日 (二) 09:00 (UTC)
Active is very important. For example, in English Minecraft Wiki, Majr is still very active as being a bureaucrat, we can often see him patrolling in Recent Changes. Another example is an IP editor in Japanese Minecraft Wiki. Although he’s an IP, he does contribute a lot. We are even less active than an IP. Our hzy and Craft_Lawrence hasn’t been active for a long time, actually, they are less active than most users in Chinese Minecraft Wiki.
Also, ‘good in English’ does not affect much. In our translation & discuss talk group, when someone who has difficulties in translating sentences asking for help, our ‘English Master’ Craft_Lawrence seldom give solutions. Everyone who is an English master can do the job of an administrator? We haven’t seen him contributing by his super English skill for a long time!
Powup333 and Craft_Lawrence are both bureaucrats, but both of them are not so active. In my opinion, a bureaucrat ought to be an ACTIVE user in Minecraft Wiki or have the ability of writing Modules. Make oneself an example leads to people’s support!
Thus, I don’t think all administrators and bureaucrats can be where they were if we have a thorough re-election.
Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 04:09 (UTC)
This is another foolish email alienating the administration team. No admins should be dismissed unless he or she is proved to be completely useless to this wiki. Discharging an admin is a big deal and should not be decided only by A event, by AN opinion of a suspicious anonymous user. a20001017Talk! 2016年8月31日 (三) 04:21 (UTC)
So I ask for a re-election. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 04:43 (UTC)
It's pointless, the wiki is running well and no big changes like re-election are needed. a20001017Talk! 2016年8月31日 (三) 04:54 (UTC)
Running well≠irresponsible administrators should remain there.Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 05:11 (UTC)
Prove me if you think some admins are unnecessary. a20001017Talk! 2016年8月31日 (三) 05:28 (UTC)
No re-election is needed. The inactive admin doesn't mean irresponsible administrator. According to the anonymous, those inactive admins who are in English Minecraft Wiki like Kanegasi should be discharged.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 05:51 (UTC)
I don't care about English Minecraft Wiki. I just want all inactive admins dismissed. Anonynous 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:05 (UTC)
Request denied. No inactive admins need discharging.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:11 (UTC)
Your words are senseless.I'm asking for reason why 'no inactive admins need discharging'. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:22 (UTC)
OK. The reason is they are still alive.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:24 (UTC)

┌──────────────────────────┘
What does your 'alive' mean? A natural person who is not dead? Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:35 (UTC)

No. They are still alive in Chinese Minecraft Wiki. They can do some actions (for example, edit some pages) in Chinese Minecraft Wiki whenever and wherever possible.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:40 (UTC)
If you count how many edits hzy, sjjklh and Craft_Lawrence did in the past one or two years, I'll be very grateful.They've proved that they don't make edits. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:49 (UTC)
But it has not proved that they don't visit Chinese Minecraft Wiki frequently.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 06:54 (UTC)
A player who often searches for information or an editor of a game-related website (who comes to copy something without obeying CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) also visits Chinese Minecraft Wiki frequently. An admin is not a people who visit wiki frequently, but someone who keeps contributing a lot or has some experience on codes. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 07:04 (UTC)
The user who contributes frequently on Chinese Minecraft Wiki is not always the admin. 135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 07:17 (UTC)
So the user who doesn't contribute frequently on Chinese Minecraft Wiki is the admin? Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 07:23 (UTC)
It doesn't matter if the admin is active. What is important is that they make exceptional contributions on the Chinese Minecraft Wiki.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 07:33 (UTC)
Let me see... I'm really sure that Powup333 made many exceptional edits, but what about the others? I hardly see any in their contributions. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 07:40 (UTC)
Sjjklh made excpetional contributions on redstone-related articles. He updated Minecon article to up-to-date version recently. Hzy980512 is familiar with Template code. Craft Lawrence can directly communicate with Curse staff. He can harmonize with the work on the Chinese Minecraft Wiki.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 08:00 (UTC)

┌──────────────────────────┘
I don't think so. Only 4 of Sjjklh's 38 edits in last 365 days are about redstone. Almost every user can update a page according to English Minecraft Wiki articles. 1 of Hzy's 10 edits is about high-tech. The values of their edits is less than many normal editors'. Craft_Lawrence, ha? A bureaucrat communicating to Curse staff is of his responsibility, and the only thing he do is making imperial order on in-game translations! Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 08:14 (UTC)

Firstly, he translated almost all the redstone-related page. It has proved that he make exceptional contribution on redstone-related articles. Secondly, Hzy and cl took part in the Chinese translation project. Then they succeeded in applying for a sub-domain which the Chinese Minecraft Wiki is using today. So cl became the Bureaucrat and hzy became the first generation of admins.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 08:33 (UTC)
'In my opinion, admins and bureaucrats should be active users who is contributing a lot and/or familiar with advanced functions, but not users who have large contributions in the past but inactive nowadays.'This is mentioned above. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 08:47 (UTC)
In fact, administrative rights are given to users based on them making exceptional contributions to the wiki. You cannot dismiss admin because of their inactive.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 08:53 (UTC)
Maybe an achievement or an honour is more suitable for editors who had made exceptional contributions, an admin is someone who use ADMINISTRATIVE RIGHTS to do contributions to a wiki. Thus, admins should be active in order to deal with wiki affairs. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 09:01 (UTC)
The honour for active users is pro. As mentioned above, it doesn't matter if the admin is active. The inactive admin are all experienced. They can handle the wiki affairs properly at the right time. But it doesn't mean they need to keep active. Beacuse there has been an active admin to do the things.135ty議(Talk)/勛(Contribs) 2016年8月31日 (三) 09:18 (UTC)
I can't see them handling the wiki affairs properly at the right time. Other admins (such as Powup333) did this for them. So they are not necessary. Otherwise, I think one active admin is not enough. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 09:25 (UTC)
It seems that your guys don't wanna reply me ya? This precisely proved that you don't have enough reasons, or the two bureaucratguānlíaos' wiki is not so good. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 09:39 (UTC)
I've replied all your queries, so, a fair, just and public vote? Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 10:06 (UTC)
@Powup333: please reopen the anonymous-speaking in the talkgroup, thanks. Anonymous 2016年8月31日 (三) 12:12 (UTC)

平頂山可能是沙漠變種?

我之前的發現就是平頂山外圍有一個沙漠窄帶來分割平頂山與其他(除海洋)生物群系,我就想說平頂山會不會是沙漠的變種,或許有可能,因為都有沙嘛,差別只在於紅沙和地形而已。發問不好請見諒。 --John5678 2016年 7月 5日 07:54 (UTC+8)

对于Minecraft Wiki 的建议

我在的“你知道吗”段落加入了关于曾经青花的说明,结果被以“加入无关资讯”的可笑理由撤销。我不认为这是无关资讯,关于青花的内容和花无关?无稽之谈。至少我不认为这有什么错。 我认为中文Wiki应当鼓励加入原创内容而不是一味地翻译英文Wiki中的内容(并且以“无关资讯”的理由删除英文Wiki中没有的内容)。

Advertisement