- January 2014 – June 2014
- July 2014 – December 2014
- January 2015 – June 2015
- July 2015 – December 2015
- 2016 – 2017
Food table
The point of having the table in a subpage was to let it be transcluded on both the Food and Hunger pages. Switching to a templatized table is fine, but please keep it so that we don't have to update both pages separately whenever a new food item is added. -- Orthotopetalk 18:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I just noticed that, which means my template will have to be absolute names. --KnightMiner
18:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Double post
Re your edit summary query here, what happened is that I hit save and got an empty page, although apparently the edit did get saved. Then I reloaded and apparently the edit was resubmitted. MediaWiki is supposed to catch that situation, but apparently there is a bug preventing that. Anomie x (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- That makes sense. I have been noticing that it sometimes does not redirect after pressing save. My web browser tells be that it will resend the edit if I reload, so I just manually go to the page after editing. I might need to mention this on the admin notice board. --KnightMiner
22:37, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Banner properties
Hey, sanoth here. Noticed how you moved the "Properties" section of the banners article and put it after the "Crafting" section. I'd like to avoid this for two reasons:
- The crafting section is so long, lots of people will miss the properties section.
- If you check the sign article (that I tried to form this article after, since they are quite related), you'll notice that the properties section is before the crafting section.
So I'd propose we put properties before crafting. :) What do you think?
--Sanotht|c 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- I was going based on the style guide's "Intro, Obtaining, Usage, Other sections, ect." I would be fine with it moving back, but this is really more of a conversation for the Style guide --KnightMiner
21:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think it would be better to discuss it with a few other people first, since it does go against the style guide. Whatever decision is made can then be applied to both articles. --KnightMiner
21:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- I think it would be better to discuss it with a few other people first, since it does go against the style guide. Whatever decision is made can then be applied to both articles. --KnightMiner
Fences/Fence Gates
I would like to point your attention over to Module_talk:Grid/Aliases regarding Fences/Fence gates =) Oozebull (talk) 22:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)