User templates
I notice that you have a user template called {{tablebox}}. Since it is a user template, I would recommend that you move it to User:HelenAngel/Tablebox.
~From Contrapple 
13:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Contrapple, this user is inactive. I doubt they will respond any time soon. — NickTheRed37 t/c (f.k.a. Naista2002) 13:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Actually, I'm NOT inactive. Will look up on how to move it. Thanks for letting me know. :) --HelenAngel (talk) 01:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Pages and templates can be easily moved using the tab from the top of the screen, though the template was already moved to User:HelenAngel/Tablebox by me. –KnightMiner t/c 03:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Can you vouch
Hi Helen! I was wondering: would you be willing to vouch on twitter or on some other social media that this is your wiki account? My ulterior motive is that I have a question pertaining to features on different devices and editions, and very likely you would be in a position to know, but first I'd like to be reasonably sure this account isn't an bizarre elaborate hoax of some kind. No problem either way! – Sealbudsman talk/contr 21:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm guessing I must have missed this somehow because I rarely look at my own page. Would be happy to verify- just let me know. Also you can always email me. --HelenAngel (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ok! So would you be able to get somebody like Jeb, ProfMobius or RazzleberryFox -- basically someone with a known wiki account here -- to reply here and vouch for who you are? Or alternately could somebody who's on twitter (see Help:Official_sources#Twitter) tweet it? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 03:22, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Sure! No problem at all. :) Marc Watson's tweet for verification: https://twitter.com/Marc_IRL/status/795743542857469952
- --HelenAngel (talk) 21:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Great : ) – Sealbudsman talk/contr 12:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Shulker shells
You have noted that shulker shells will be added at some point. Because of this, I assume you have a source. Can you add shulker shells to Pocket Edition mentioned features? The Blobs
02:16, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, my source is that I am on the Minecraft team. I can indeed add it. --HelenAngel (talk) 22:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Tall biomes (PE)
In 1.0, the height limit was increased to 256 blocks. Previously, biomes that exceeded 128 blocks were shrunk. Were they brought to normal in 1.0? The Blobs 00:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, all the biomes should be back to normal. However, chunk generation still applies so if you generated the chunk before the update, it will stay the way it is. --HelenAngel (talk) 01:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
In regards to PE on Windows Phone
Having a little scuffle on the 1.0 talk right now; can you confirm if either PE for Windows Phone 8.1 is discontinued or if the update is trying to get through certification? Thanks! -BDJP (t|c) 02:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Will pop on there now. :) --HelenAngel (talk) 01:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Ore
It seems that in Pocket Edition, ores are more common than they once were. Is this correct? If so, what version increased the amount of ore? The Blobs 15:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure- I didn't think we changed the amount or distribution of ore. I'll check with the devs. --HelenAngel (talk) 21:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, I checked with our devs and there weren't any changes made to ore distribution or ore generation. Maybe you just were lucky? :) --HelenAngel (talk) 23:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
A possibly fake PE build?
Hello. We'll need you again for this minor thing. Can you confirm that a build for Pocket Edition 1.0.3 does indeed exist (there is a page already up, yet there is no mention of the build on the feedback website or on the bug tracker)? Thanks. -BDJP (t|c) 00:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- It does indeed exist. It's labeled as a beta build on both Google Play and in-game. A quick glance at the disassembly code reveals no obvious new blocks, items, or entities, and the features that were added mostly relate to servers/realms. My guess is that it's mostly a beta for new multiplayer features, which also happens to include a few bug fixes. Edit: You may want to relook at the bug tracker, because it's listed as a version.Jocopa3 (talk) 20:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this is my bad because I have been really ill and haven't been able to get the changelog until now. Am going to go over it and add anything that isn't there. --HelenAngel (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Colored blocks
Looking at the reference for the falling block, the "soaked" form looks very similar to the other colored block. Can you confirm that they are the same? The Blobs 18:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hrm... let me check on this. --HelenAngel (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- We can't confirm anything at this time as it's still in development. --HelenAngel (talk) 23:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
1.0.6
ItsPlantseed created Pocket Edition 1.0.6, even though 1.0.5 has not been released yet. Is this a mistake, or is it correct? The Blobs 03:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's real, even though 1.0.5 hasn't been released. Most of the people in Reddit says that the 1.0.5.13 supposedly to be the final release. -
ItsPlantseed | 04:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's real, even though 1.0.5 hasn't been released. Most of the people in Reddit says that the 1.0.5.13 supposedly to be the final release. -
- I can confirm this is correct, as I have downloaded the 1.0.6 beta. However, my question is if 1.0.6 beta is just a continuation of the 1.0.5 beta, seeing as the last 1.0.5 beta build was "released" by accident. Jocopa3 (talk) 04:29, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- No, the 1.0.6 beta is for 1.0.6 which will be released when we get these bugs fixed. --HelenAngel (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Minecraft_Staff (talk • contribs • logs • block log)
Hi, is this user officially affiliated with you all? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 05:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)