Spam Lite (reduced sodium!)
Thanks for the removal, but don't worry about it. I'll catch it, and if I don't, the admin will. Uber's pretty quick on it. :D Oh, and I was somewhat asking for mild trolling. "Spam away" indeed. -Wulfenbach (not on fire for once) 02:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Please post a notice on the Admin noticeboard when this starts happening. It will quickly alert the admins. Thanks! -- Wynthyst
talk 12:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Kongregate
You're on Kongregate? Add Enzo2. Rocĸetor talk 09:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but no, I don't take *random* friend requests. Earn my trust, then sure. Darkid 23:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC) (Page Author)
Userpage Editing
there is no button for where I can edit my userpage.
Joev14 17:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Why are you asking me? Darkid 21:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Clarifying a bit more on my edit
The Renewable Resources page has had the philosophy of showing all products in all places possible for quite a while. If something uses gold, even if the gold is in another section, things like golden swords are a renewable product of wood, because sticks are used in gold swords. Just as one example. But even then, in your edit you stated that potions required nonrenewable glass. You told me that you were aware of trading making glass renewable, however, your edit said otherwise. Not trying to be rude here, btw, just making some points and a reply. :) Funky3000 19:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- For future reference, try to keep talk page comments collated--i.e. on one page.
- I was not saying that (for example) blaze rods did not produce splash potions of fire resistance. I was saying that they did not produce them renewable without trading. Splash potions of fire resistance were still (would have been still) listed on the page, in the trade-ably renewable section. Thus, there would have been a differentiation between trading-involved and non-trading-involved. Darkid 22:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)