Minecraft Wiki
Advertisement

Sign your posts with ~~~~ and always add new posts at the very bottom after previous sections.

Picture of pigmen[]

I have a picture of the pigmen that I fished out of the minecraft files, however I'm not confident enough to edit the page and put it in - so if somebody could I would be happy. [1] Em0srawk 07:27, 8 November 2010

Done! JaffaCakeLover 17:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Em0srawk (Talk|Contribs) 06:20, 10 November 2010. Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Planned?[]

When did Notch say they were planned? JesusChrist666 21:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Soon. But probably not this year. D: Rocĸetor talk 08:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

i have the feeling pigmen, if they will come into the game at all, may come after the sky dimensions are added, at least it would make sense, because the villages already have npcs and pigman are the opposite of zombie pigmen, so may be used in the sky dimensions. Just my two cents, but only the future can tell how they will be used. --Wally –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.72.31.114 (Talk) 16:09, 23 September 2011‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Pigmen[]

So, will pigmen venture out of their houses or stay inside them like wimps? --Rocĸetor talk 06:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Friendable?[]

I would assume it may be possible for pigmen to be allies, Being intelligent like players in SMP, It would make SSP less lonely. And would be awesome to have a large party of pigmen...

Quick, Someone throw this to notch. SAraisXenoQueen 08:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Clever AI is hard to make, and suggestions go to the forums. Calinou - talk × contribs » 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
And that, my friends, is why the development team hired Jon. Leave it to him to make Zombies and Skeletons terrifying again. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Tom633 (Talk|Contribs) 02:24, 12 February 2012‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Sources[]

Why are there two links to the exact same status on the page? Don't you only need one? Contrajoe 20:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are talking about exactly. Calinou - talk × contribs » 20:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

NPC speech suggestion from Reddit[]

There was a great Reddit post covering NPC speech, the OP suggested pictographs instead of words. It allowed for universal NPC speech without need for translation. Here The NPC speech dilemma suggestion: Pictographs. --Ecksearoh 15:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

A question[]

Will it be implemented in the game, or will it's files only be in the coding, only to be seen in regular gameplay through a mod? Because personally, this is an interesting mob. - Another n00b 13:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Pigmen Villages[]

There should be Pigmen Villages and the pigmen should be smarter than a player but is still friendable and they would have huge defences that kills hostile mobs and the buildings would have iron doors, buttons to open the doors, iron walls, and glass panes 156.34.179.93 02:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I hate it when people just demand what they think should be added. Is starting a sentence with "I think" so bad? Besides you're speculating.--98.111.219.231 17:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

No starting with "I think" isn't bad its boring like YOU 98.111.219.231 156.34.161.100 15:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Will probably never be implemented[]

I honestly don't think pigmen are going to be implemented. Not that we should put them in a not-implemented category or anything but I just think they won't with the new villager mobs. I kinda wish that pigmen replaced villager mobs, because they suit it more--I mean it makes sense, having zombie pigmen in the Nether, which is like Hell, and having normal pigmen in villages. I almost hate the villagers, honestly. I would be perfectly okay with the villagers being replaced with pigmen... *sigh* Electrk 18:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

We have Zombie Pigmen in the Nether. We have Endermen in the End. We have Villagers in the Overworld. These three are somewhat intelligent (zombie pigmen with their team attacks, Endermen pick up blocks, Villagers will open and close and open and close doors. If there is a fourth dimension added to the game (Sky Dimension) it would make sense for another intelligent being.
So, like Wally above, I believe the Sky Dimension is our best bet for getting them implemented. 76.176.110.143 02:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

An interesting Idea...[]

Now, I was thinking about Pigmen, and what their purpose would be, and I could not think for the life of me where they would be implemented. Certainly not in the Overworld, as it's overloaded. No in the Nether or End. And it wouldn't make since for them to be in the Sky Dimension unless they could fly. So I came up with an entirely new idea. The PORK dimension. Yes. I know, it sounds crazy. BUT. It would certainly be interesting, no? Anyway, this dimension would be filled with villages more common than normal villages, and the biome would always be Plains. These villages would be built of stone bricks, mossy stone bricks, would, cobblestone, etc., and would have intelligent Pigmen in them. They could also have Graveyards, in which there were graves, and underneath, a hostile Zombie Pigman spawner dungeon with tons of food items in the chest, like cooked pork. Don't ridicule me, it's just an idea. And I do realize the AI would be insanely difficult, but with Jon's genious it would be cake. --Apocalyptic Builder 02:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

skyt dime- whatever how you spell, it is a HUGE chuck of land floating... only created when floating islands are HUGEMUSGIST! they can have villages... however, the world is the same, but replaced by the end............... the world is a chuck of land being amazing and is a cool world, the end is that

This mob will not be released[]

Since Notch is working on villager AI very much now, I don't think we'll see pigmen. I propose deleting the page, the same as with fish mob. Xeoxer 12:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Notch isn't working on anything Minecraft-related now; he retired from Minecraft development. It's all being done by Jeb and Jon Kagstrom now. No comment on whether this page should be deleted, though... ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 19:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
This page should NOT be deleted. The arguments people give to get pages such as this deleted are truly stupid...Ivyn 00:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Where will they spawn?[]

Overworld, netherworld, skyworld or enderworld? Maxum 18:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

There's absolutely no information given about pigmen by Mojang. How should we know, where they will spawn, if they will be implemented at all? --☺ Sven ? ! 13:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
If they are added, it would make sense to make them spawn and build cities on the biggest sky world island [land wise].

Heading Text[]

The new header about how pigmen will never be added should be removed. Notch stated once that he would DEFINITELY add normal pigmen if he added zombified ones. Jeb WILL put them in. --Apocalyptic Builder 22:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Problems with vandals. How you can help fix this.[]

Our beloved Pigman is somewhat losing his page. Some rude Folks are Vandalizing his page by deleting stuff about him. Thankfully Good Folks Like APSC Users, And other Users Have Back Ups on some of the info on his page!So please keep this page safe. ol Piggy man would want it that way. Why not volunteer as a Security guard for his page. maybe one day we will see him officially in Minecraft.

"Vandalizing is a problem in many websites around the world. but, If we come together, we can help slow it down. by keeping back ups of the WIKI, And ReUpload them back where they belong. We can't stop vandals entirely, but we can give our grate WIKI Some piece of mind."

-APSC Members, and others. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Spencer10APSC (Talk|Contribs) 16:38, 16 June 2012‎. Please sign your posts with ~~~~

I don't see any vandalism problem at all. What I do see, however, is you constantly adding non-noteworthy trivia and mod information, which is rightly being reverted. If this is what you're talking about, I suggest you check your accusations; the people doing the reverting are well-established editors in this community and definitely not vandals. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

::Well, (1) i have more than one account (APSC/Mojang) That I and my Friends use.

(2) i often have My Members post things (If i give them permission) when i don't have the time.
And (3) I just found out that someone (i'm not saying who) has used a few our of notes and posted them without my permission. but no worries.
we have settled the score with em and me just fine. Things are now back to normal.
I Apologize for the Confusion. For now on, there will be a new account if some Other APSC Member wants to add WIKI Info. Okay? Good. User:Spencer10APSC 19:10, 16 June 2012‎

1 and 2: There needs to be one account per person, and generally each person should only have one account (Rule 21). If your members want to self-identify as members of the APSC, that's fine, but you should not be using role accounts.
3: What notes are you talking about? If information is available publicly, it's fair game for being posted to the wiki, regardless of who first collected/obtained it or what trouble they went through to do so.
Again, any member of the APSC that wants to contribute to the wiki must create their own account to do so; account sharing is not allowed. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 19:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Ya, I don't know why I added that, I was just tiring to add Credit for the "trivia" mistake. :P There is only one Other APSC Member. he does not even know about my account. He has his MC Account. But never uses it. Never mind, the crossed out text(s) its all fiction. You may Delete this topic if you want, I don't Mind. and also, "role accounts"? call me crazy if you want, but I don't even know exactly what that means. Well does not madder, I don't have any. Never mind all this stuff above. -Have fun. Spencer10APSC 17:35, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

skin pack 2[]

in the xbox edition skin pack 2 allows you to play as a pigman with the exact same skin of the picture on the page and its actually titled pigman ( minecraft )92.18.237.176 17:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

they should have zombie pigs[]

Pig get zapped = Zombie Pig Pigman gets zapped = Zombie Pigman

Fail[]

if you look at the xbox-skinpack picture you can see its not a pigman, but a pig because of the nipples! i think you should remove it! Sigurd4 13:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Done --~Legobatman3609~ 03:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

woooooooow!![]

i dont have proof but me and my freind saw pigmen building in minecraft is this posible how is this happening plz belive me –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.245.45 (talk) 18:41, 7 June 2013(UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

Probably another player using the pigman skin. -- Orthotope talk 19:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Why are transfer pages?[]

I think that I should add information to the page of Pigman and make it as an official page. Unlike Red Dragon and Panda he has a clear history and accurate skin.--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 06:12, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

What else is there to say about the pigman? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 06:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I have the following information about Pigman:
  1. Pigman was proposed by Minecraft user Mr.Miclee.
  2. Events related to cape about it.
  3. The villagers were implemented instead of Pigman.
--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 06:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC) :::If you want, I can create a page.--<nowiki>{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 13:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
It seems like it would be quite small, not much more information than what's already on the removed features page ... but yeah, if you want to demo a page in your user space, sure. – Sealbudsman talk/contr 18:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Let's demonstrate with my first sandbox pigman page. However, please be careful as it may take some time. (I am sorry if there is an English mistake.)--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 03:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Creation is finished. (I am referring to the German, Polish, Korean version.)--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 04:58, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Two days is not the typical time for a change, and the article really does not have enough content to be in agreement with the notability guidelines. Pigmen were never more than a single texture, the history about the model is pure speculation. As just a single texture, it does not need its own article, the single paragraph is quite enough. –KnightMiner t/c 17:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
For the model, it was created based on the information of the page of the other language version. Then, is it also better to replace pigman's pages in the German, Polish, and Korean versions as well?--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 22:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

I see that the format of this article is not quite compatible with the guidelines. Nevertheless, the German page mentions another reference verifying that the information about the Pigman is not "pure speculation". The German article also supports the History section of this article.
In addition to that, I don't see the point of saying that a page is too small to be in the wiki. Instead, I do see the point of keeping the system with only one Removed features page, given that this is even the case. Iwer Sonsch (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I did not doubt the townspeople information, I doubted the model and drops.
The reason I originally pushed to remove these article and still push against them is because it was never more than a potential feature with a texture. A single texture that was never utilized is not worth creating an article that will simply be a stub and it a huge target for speculation and clutters the wiki with low quality articles that cannot become better, thus condensing it to a single paragraph makes much more sense.
In any case, if you want to argue for this pages existence, take it up on the style guide, as right now it is going to definitely be a no due to violation of the aforementioned policy. KnightMiner t/c 22:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do the following discussion here.--{{User:Beans1512/Sign}} 09:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Advertisement