Minecraft Wiki
Advertisement

Could we also rank them by % chance, not just Alphabetically?

I.e. , like the Snapshot description Page:

   10% chance: all saplings, all leaves, all types of seeds (except nether wart), (sea) grass, sweet berries, and (dried) kelp.
   20% chance: dried kelp blocks, tall grass, sugar cane, cactus, vines, and melon slices.
   50% chance: wheat, lily pads, melons, sea pickles, pumpkins, apples, potatoes, beetroots, carrots, cocoa beans, all mushrooms, mushroom stem blocks (not mushroom blocks), all ferns, and all (tall) flowers.
   80% chance: hay blocks, bread, cookies, and baked potatoes.
   100% chance: cake and pumpkin pie.

It also helps show those 5 only seemingly specific % amounts. Easier to keep track of same-#'s. Yilante 1 /16 /19 5:02 p.m. 76.209.248.192 01:02, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Th table can be sorted by the chance to compost, by clicking the column header. Having a compact per-chance list in addition to the table might be a good idea, though. ディノ千?!☎ Dinoguy1000 01:32, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I've added Lua error in Module:Delimited_tag at line 15: No tag text provided.?. so hopefully it might sort correctly now. – Nixinova Nixinova sig image 1 Nixinova sig image 2 01:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
And it looks very niice. But as pointed-out in the MC Forum, "their % 's are weird."
So we should probably also analyze the best-ranges of given plants /crops /Crafted-Food, yields. So for example, do each by basically-efficiency of input-type to amount of output for it.
To specifically quote, "As things stand you're always better off composting with raw materials." ("Shadow" icon). Yilante 1 /17 /19 2:33 a.m. 76.209.248.192 10:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Advertisement