Also, by using a hopper over hopper the cicuit can't cycle as quickly because the top hopper gets disabled by the top dropper being powered, which is why Grizdale's uses a chest over a hopper. Also, if you follow the link to Grizdale's thread, there's an even smaller variation where you put the comparator right on the hopper (the top dropper ejects the item into the "air" above the comparator, but the hopper grabs it before it can go anywhere).
Hmm. The wiki ate my comment. I'll try again. The "Doom Gate" you added to Memory circuit was a minor variation of Grizdale's TFF described directly above your addition. Because of this I've removed your additon, but merged your interesting point about being able to set the output on into Grizdale's TFF.
The "Doom Gate" you added to Memory circuit was a minor variation of Grizdale's TFF described directly above your addition. Because of this I removed your addition, but I merged the interesting point you made about being able to SET the output on into that section.
Also, by using a hopper over hopper the cicuit can't cycle as quickly because the top hopper gets disabled by the top dropper being powered, which is why Grizdale's uses a chest over a hopper. Also, if you follow the link to Grizdale's thread, there's an even smaller variation where you put the comparator right on the hopper (the top dropper ejects the item into the "air" above the comparator, but the hopper grabs it before it can go anywhere).
No, I'm wrong, the bottom dropper should still pull the item. But do check out the smaller variation.
Hmm. The wiki ate my comment. I'll try again. The "Doom Gate" you added to Memory circuit was a minor variation of Grizdale's TFF described directly above your addition. Because of this I've removed your additon, but merged your interesting point about being able to set the output on into Grizdale's TFF.
Hi Hello2215 and welcome to the wiki.
The "Doom Gate" you added to Memory circuit was a minor variation of Grizdale's TFF described directly above your addition. Because of this I removed your addition, but I merged the interesting point you made about being able to SET the output on into that section.