No worries, I thought I'd message you to prevent further conflicts (eg you were editing a few file pages, and moved one while I was about to move them, almost resulting in so not so fun changes :)
lol i have like 5.4 edits a day because i created my account months even before your Humiebees account and abandoned it until like July. Still, even if my account was created later, then the my edits per day (probably 8-14ish i would guess) is nothing compared to your48.4 edits/day.
Adding {{el}} templates to replace section headings version disambig pages doesn't actually save disk space; it actually uses more disk space because the old revision is not deleted on disk; also, it adds links to broad-concept pages that are not ambiguous with the disambig page titles and links in section headings are discouraged.
I just don't know where to put the updated Java Edition logo, that is all. Would it be fine if I make a gallery section on the Java Edition page, or something else?
There is something called Ticking area in Bedrock, so if this is there, there is no need to do this on Java page. So discussion was like mind was lazy and wanted to do something instead of reverting vandalism.
Sry, but not everything means it will repeat. Placing there 1.18 is placing a speculation, so you're violating rules. If there won't be any update on 1.17, then you can't say it will reveal 1.18.
Look, I said it would Most likely be 1.18 for consistancy. 1.14 was revealed the year before, 1.16 was revealed the year before, and considering mojangs Major Minor update scheduale, 1.17 will release 2020 and 1.18 will release 2021, and 2021 is the year after 2020 is what i am saying 😉
becuase i want to do the edits fast to revert vandalism as fast as possible though i have gotten into a habit of misspelling vandalism incorrectly (vandalsim)
I don't think it's necessary to warn an IP after a single unconstructive edit. Only when they do at least two very severe or at least three minor unconstroctive edits. Most IPs only do about 1-2 edits and leave the wiki alone anyway. But still, thank you for reverting those edits.
Yeah, I just think it creates a lot of unnecessary talk pages, as most of those IPs only do 1-2 edits and you won't see anything of them anymore. Nothing of a big deal though.
NineTreyBlud in discord is Offline.
Sorry for my edit, I thought I was on another page. (My page)
its fine, just make sure you remember what page you are editing 👀
Okay
Oh wait btw how do you unwatch pages
Discuss this in my talk page. You unwatch pages by clicking on the blue star on the top right of your screen
Please don't touch those awaiting deletion files, I'm working on them while you're editing, which causes conflicts
ok sorry
No worries, I thought I'd message you to prevent further conflicts (eg you were editing a few file pages, and moved one while I was about to move them, almost resulting in so not so fun changes :)
New gravatar? Interesting, I should change mine, because I changed my minecraft skin
Well i did it becuase i did not want to have an empty one, this one is not fitting though....
Then which one would be fitting then?
A bee related one
Okay
My new gravatar, I would say, is fitting
lol i have like 5.4 edits a day because i created my account months even before your Humiebees account and abandoned it until like July. Still, even if my account was created later, then the my edits per day (probably 8-14ish i would guess) is nothing compared to your48.4 edits/day.
posted less than a minute ago Humiebee oh, i still don't get how i have 48.4 edits per day.......
posted less than a minute ago Humiebee oh, i still don't get how i have 48.4 edits per day.......
posted less than a minute ago Humiebee oh, i still don't get how i have 48.4 edits per day.......
posted less than a minute ago Humiebee oh, i still don't get how i have 48.4 edits per day.......
Your User:Java Edition 1.17 page got deleted probably due to the UCP migration; you might want to submit a ticket to get it restored.
I wanted it deleted anyways, meh
I wanted it deleted anyways, meh
Adding {{el}} templates to replace section headings version disambig pages doesn't actually save disk space; it actually uses more disk space because the old revision is not deleted on disk; also, it adds links to broad-concept pages that are not ambiguous with the disambig page titles and links in section headings are discouraged.
why are links in section headings discouraged ?, and for your first point, removing them uses more space as well
Wikipedia:MOS:LINKSTYLE
Feel free to go ahead and correct the broken file links from the moves i did a few minutes back.
okay??.....
done!
I just don't know where to put the updated Java Edition logo, that is all. Would it be fine if I make a gallery section on the Java Edition page, or something else?
Put it on the bug tracker page i guess
Congratulations for reaching top 100 of this Wiki! I just hit top 500!
thanks😁
You're welcome
Humie is now in the top 50, so mega congrats.
updated the profile
i mean user page
https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Minecraft_Wiki_talk:Community_portal&diff=1689099&oldid=1689092 Sry, but i needed to strokehood one your idea, because it is interwiki shortcut for mediawiki.org. That means it is not possible to add.
I can't delete pages, even in my own userspace. How did you get the Poof! achievement?
Overwriting a page gets you poof.
https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Minecraft_Wiki_talk:Community_portal&oldid=1685515
Sry, but see this change https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Spawn_chunk&diff=prev&oldid=1520124 and this change https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Spawn_chunk&diff=next&oldid=1520124
Sorry but the discussion should still be open as there is a merge temp, there could still be further discussion about this
There is something called Ticking area in Bedrock, so if this is there, there is no need to do this on Java page. So discussion was like mind was lazy and wanted to do something instead of reverting vandalism.
https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Java_Edition_1.16.3&diff=1682953&oldid=1682878 If they can assume by themself, then this edits was unreasonable. Also no edit is no useful (except vandalism/spam). We should also add information for who started playing Minecraft right today and decided to see newest development version.
https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Minecraft_Live_2020&diff=1678634&oldid=1678616
Sry, but not everything means it will repeat. Placing there 1.18 is placing a speculation, so you're violating rules. If there won't be any update on 1.17, then you can't say it will reveal 1.18.
Look, I said it would Most likely be 1.18 for consistancy. 1.14 was revealed the year before, 1.16 was revealed the year before, and considering mojangs Major Minor update scheduale, 1.17 will release 2020 and 1.18 will release 2021, and 2021 is the year after 2020 is what i am saying 😉
Probably not. 1.16.3 release candidate was released already.
https://youtu.be/iN2ERVo90QM?t=53 is not unsourced? I thought you know that. ;)
oh.... i'm sorry, I didn't look carefully enogugh
why do you always commit grammar errors when talking in a undo edit?
becuase i want to do the edits fast to revert vandalism as fast as possible though i have gotten into a habit of misspelling vandalism incorrectly (vandalsim)
thanks for your edits on creeping winter, make sure that no one else tries to put false release dates.
your welcome, also, they finally announed the release date on minecraft.net!!!, the others did not give sources so yeah.
Ok I just saw that
I don't think it's necessary to warn an IP after a single unconstructive edit. Only when they do at least two very severe or at least three minor unconstroctive edits. Most IPs only do about 1-2 edits and leave the wiki alone anyway. But still, thank you for reverting those edits.
oh ok
though the template was the weakest warning template, {subst:editwarning1}
Yeah, I just think it creates a lot of unnecessary talk pages, as most of those IPs only do 1-2 edits and you won't see anything of them anymore. Nothing of a big deal though.
Thank you for the link stuff, that was fairly annoying, it exists it's just that they couldn't find it.
It doesn't exist yet.
https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-1-16-2-pre-release-2?3
That's for the last pre-release.
why are you dicussing in my profile, it's a same week pre release so like it's meant to have the pre 2 link
why are you dicussing in my profile, it's a same week pre release so like it's meant to have the pre 2 link
When moving revision files, please always untick the "create redirect" button. But before that, please linkfix everything.
oh, ok sorry.