They were tagged for deletion, they were unused anywhere, and they didn't need to be there because InvSprite already includes them. Why do they need restoration?
I still want to know, why do they need restoration when we have {{InvSprite}}? Again, they were deleted because they were tagged for deletion, and they were not being used anywhere. I can restore them and remove the deletion tag, but I need to know why you need those specific images (I have deleted dozens of grid images) when we have a newer accepted mechanism to display them?
This does not exist in Bedrock, and that has the largest installed base, so it would be meaningless and misleading to most readers. If you want to add this factoid, you need to explain it better. What edition, what version, what enchantment, what command, etc.
I don't believe it is possible on this wiki. At least I haven't figured out how. It may not be possible because one cannot log into this wiki directly (I log in via Twitch). I don't really know.
Hey, wanna apologise for my undo on sugar cane. I'm on mobile and it saved before I could finish. The video was made before composting and is therefore out of date.
{{reply|PancakeIdentity}} If the information in the video is still valid and true, then the video isn't out of date. It may be incomplete but it isn't out of date.
Keep in mind (as I know from personal experience with my own child) that some players are young and have difficulty reading the wiki pages, but they know how to use a browser and watch videos. These concise 1-minute videos you've been deleting have been extremely useful to young players like my child. My position remains: If the video doesn't mislead, then the video should be kept. If the video contains incorrect information, then it should be deleted. You've been a bit too ambitious in your removal of these, in my view.
hey Amatulic. I notice your draft for villger trades includes prices for enchanted item trades. Slicedlime uploaded a new corrected version video of all trades (see this video), where those enchanted item trades are priced as "?" emeralds. I too, think it is best to use wildcards for enchanted items trades, because their prices depend on the enchantments.
When I started it on 4/26, Villager#Trading had a subsection "Trades" that included only a link to that big graphic, so I thought I'd reproduce it in a wiki table. I know full well that I will have to go back through and correct it; you may notice in the page source I have added comments "CONTRADICTION" where these two sources disagree.
At the time, oddly, I failed to notice that we have a stand-alone article Trading, which has much more detail than the table I'm creating. I think my table might still be a good summary for the Villager article though.
I see. So that's why you were making the table. Well anyway, I've removed the table from the Villager page, due to the separate Trading one and due to the crazy amount of info on the Villager page already cramming everything. If you feel you have improvements in design, layout or info of the table on Trading page, feel free to add those to it directly. I don't think we should duplicate the info to the Villager page.
I wasn't thinking of it as duplicating the info, more like summarizing the info. The Trading page is really comprehensive (and should be); I just wanted to show what items could be traded. If you believe it's unnecessary though, I won't add it, but rather I'll propose it on the talk page and see what others think.
Hey, where is the discuss page
It's called a "talk" page. Go to any article and on the right side near the top there is a link labeled "Talk".
Hi i think you are a cool dude
They were tagged for deletion, they were unused anywhere, and they didn't need to be there because InvSprite already includes them. Why do they need restoration?
I've been using these files in several pages (e.g. Invalid Data Value Leaves) to represent item icons in pre-1.8 Java Edition versions.
I still want to know, why do they need restoration when we have {{InvSprite}}? Again, they were deleted because they were tagged for deletion, and they were not being used anywhere. I can restore them and remove the deletion tag, but I need to know why you need those specific images (I have deleted dozens of grid images) when we have a newer accepted mechanism to display them?
Why did you just delete a bunch of grid icon images? Those were only just recovered just a few hours prior.
? what is enchanted profile
I don't know what you're referring to.
about the enchated eggs, you can have enchanted eggs with command or with an anvil and an enchanted book in creative mode
This does not exist in Bedrock, and that has the largest installed base, so it would be meaningless and misleading to most readers. If you want to add this factoid, you need to explain it better. What edition, what version, what enchantment, what command, etc.
How can I email a user in this wiki?
I don't believe it is possible on this wiki. At least I haven't figured out how. It may not be possible because one cannot log into this wiki directly (I log in via Twitch). I don't really know.
I'm bored.
I missed you.
I haven't gone anywhere. Just slowed down a bit.
Will you ask me in your latest discussion?
since 3 days i haven't edit, so did you waited for me?
I'm not waiting for anyone. Welcome back.
Hey, wanna apologise for my undo on sugar cane. I'm on mobile and it saved before I could finish. The video was made before composting and is therefore out of date.
{{reply|PancakeIdentity}} If the information in the video is still valid and true, then the video isn't out of date. It may be incomplete but it isn't out of date.
Keep in mind (as I know from personal experience with my own child) that some players are young and have difficulty reading the wiki pages, but they know how to use a browser and watch videos. These concise 1-minute videos you've been deleting have been extremely useful to young players like my child. My position remains: If the video doesn't mislead, then the video should be kept. If the video contains incorrect information, then it should be deleted. You've been a bit too ambitious in your removal of these, in my view.
{{reply|PancakeIdentity}} followup; I've started a discussion at Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal#Mass deletion of mcspotlights videos. Please weigh in with your views.
hey Amatulic. I notice your draft for villger trades includes prices for enchanted item trades. Slicedlime uploaded a new corrected version video of all trades (see this video), where those enchanted item trades are priced as "?" emeralds. I too, think it is best to use wildcards for enchanted items trades, because their prices depend on the enchantments.
Would you allow me to fix that myself too?
Feel free. User:Amatulic/Trades draft is just a draft. I've been slowly filling it in using information from these two sources: https://www.planetminecraft.com/blog/1-14-villager-trade/ and https://gamepedia.cursecdn.com/minecraft_gamepedia/8/8f/Villager_trading_1.14.jpg?version=71e89ab2ec6ade9e0db7bbdd2cc49b0e
When I started it on 4/26, Villager#Trading had a subsection "Trades" that included only a link to that big graphic, so I thought I'd reproduce it in a wiki table. I know full well that I will have to go back through and correct it; you may notice in the page source I have added comments "CONTRADICTION" where these two sources disagree.
At the time, oddly, I failed to notice that we have a stand-alone article Trading, which has much more detail than the table I'm creating. I think my table might still be a good summary for the Villager article though.
I see. So that's why you were making the table. Well anyway, I've removed the table from the Villager page, due to the separate Trading one and due to the crazy amount of info on the Villager page already cramming everything. If you feel you have improvements in design, layout or info of the table on Trading page, feel free to add those to it directly. I don't think we should duplicate the info to the Villager page.
I wasn't thinking of it as duplicating the info, more like summarizing the info. The Trading page is really comprehensive (and should be); I just wanted to show what items could be traded. If you believe it's unnecessary though, I won't add it, but rather I'll propose it on the talk page and see what others think.
Great, thanks!