Minecraft Wiki
Advertisement

The Church page

The page is protected from creation. It should probably redirect to Village structures (which it didn't, according to the deletion log). Can an admin please create the page? If there is any further vandalism, it can be turned back into a redirect, then protected from editing, but not deleted. The BlobsPaper 04:55, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

New launcher released

Both Main page Launcher info and text at Talk:Minecraft Wiki Page (here 5 New launcher released) are not actual. 2.0.847 is newer since April 10, 2017. Please, correct it. --HeruGil (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Again: New launcher released

Two points:
1. Both Main page Launcher info and text at Talk:Minecraft Wiki Page (here 5 New launcher released) are not actual. 2.0.1003 is newer since October, 2017. Please, correct it.
2. I tried to edit the Talk:Minecraft Wiki Page, but system stated an answer (same case as above on 23 April 2017):
Your action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed.
A brief description of the matched abuse rule for your action is: Extra protection for frequent spam targets
Can you explain why registered user (me) is not allowed to edit this page?
Thank you.
--HeruGil (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
1. Fixed.
2. Abuse filters are a bit harsh towards new users. Such problems with editing should stop once you make specified amount of contributions (~10?). piotrex43 (Talk page) 13:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Icon for Curse staff?

We currently have icons identifying edits made by Mojang employees. I'm wondering if it would be worth adding a similar icon for Curse staff, as most of them are infrequent editors, so their usernames are not always recognized by other contributors. I see a few people have this in their personal CSS already; should we add it to the sitewide CSS? -- Orthotopetalk 23:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

 Support Sealbudsman talk/contr 23:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 Also support The BlobsPaper 01:02, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 Support GoandgooTalk
Contribs
13:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 Support --Pokechu22 (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Done, since no one seems to have any objections. -- Orthotopetalk 18:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Seems like for Game widow it isn't showing up. See Special:Diff/1094509. Maybe use an underscore in the selector instead of a space? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 22:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Curious, also, is there a reason for using the ~= to match in some cases, and the = in other cases? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 22:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Should be fixed, you might have to clear your cache. I borrowed the code from Majr's personal css, not sure why he was using that (it matches anywhere in the string, rather than exactly). -- Orthotopetalk 00:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I see it on Game widow now; thanks! – Sealbudsman talk/contr 01:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
"~=" is preceding with instead of equals. It was used so redlinks would me matched, as we are searching by title and if the user's page did not exist, the title is "User:X (page does not exist)". I think it is no longer required since the user profile system makes the user page always exist. KnightMiner · (t) 03:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Gray thing icon for ex-Mojang

What do we think about using a gray icon for wiki editors who were once at Mojang, but are no longer, as in how it's done on Reddit.

Sealbudsman talk/contr 12:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

 Support The BlobsPaper 13:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 Support GoandgooTalk
Contribs
13:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 Support --Pokechu22 (talk) 20:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Sure, we'd just need to upload an icon to use. -- Orthotopetalk 18:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
How about, Gray Mojang Thing Sealbudsman talk/contr 22:42, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
That looks like a good icon. Can an admin apply it? The BlobsPaper 22:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Done, thanks for supplying the image. -- Orthotopetalk 00:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! – Sealbudsman talk/contr 01:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Archiving

Please archive this page Minecraft Wiki:Admin noticeboard. — Ivan-r ru.Wiki Admin 19:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done: Talk page archived Archive 3: 2015 - 2016 and main page archived Archive 27: Nov - Dec 2016NixinovaGrid Book and Quill Grid Diamond Pickaxe Grid Map • 04:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Translate extension

It would be better if there will be an Extension:Translate installed in this wiki, rather than being individual projects, just like in the FTB Wiki (source). It will really help translators (like me) to translate pages into their own languages, without manually editing the pages and editing the corresponding language translation projects. I do not recommend installing it in interlanguages, as they are already translated into their own languages. – Dentedharp90041tce 14:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Use of this extension was touched on at Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal#Translation cleanup, though there wasn't really a proper discussion of its use per se. I am passingly familiar with its use on Mediawiki.org and Meta.Wikimedia.org, and have never been terribly impressed with its markup requirements, but I've never made use of it myself so I can't comment on anything else really. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 15:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
The usage of Extension:Translate implies usage of special markup which may confuse newcomers. Also, as I have already noted in the linked discussion, VisualEditor apparently doesn’t understand such markup which may cause problems when using it. — BabylonAS (talk | ru.Wiki Admin) (fka NickTheRed37) 16:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Correction for Babylon: it doesn't confuse newcomers, it seems to confuse everyone. As translation administrator of the FTB Wiki, from what I've seen, every other editor can't seem to figure out to edit around it, even the editors that should know how to. IMO it's really not that complicated, but it's not intuitive at all.
Also, you'd have to apply markup to every article, template and module. And if you do it right (not just putting the entire page in a <translate>) that will take a long time, along with the pain of fixing it when others break it. -Xbony2 (FTB Wiki Admin) (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, even that. I think FTB Wiki had it installed when it wasn’t intended to be freely edited (until one of FTB Wiki’s prominent editors called for allowing open registration). On the other hand, MediaWiki and Wikimedia’s Meta wikis are open, yet have it installed. Is it more stable there — I don’t know.
By the way, new Wikimedia projects (like Wikipedia’s language sections) are actually started on Meta’s incubator. Gamepedia’s closest analog of Wikimedia’s Meta is Gamepedia Help Wiki, although it is primarily used only as a help wiki. If reorganized (and probably renamed to something like “Gamepedia Central Wiki”), it would be a better place to start wiki translation projects, rather than the specific English wikis.
Also, Extension:Translate wouldn’t eliminate the current project system: in fact, it will be best used if projects are adapted to it. — BabylonAS (talk | ru.Wiki Admin) (fka NickTheRed37) 16:04, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The wiki was freely editable at the point it was introduced, not really relevant though.
Stuff needs to be re-transferred if Extension:Translate is to be adapted to a page. For example, if we marked up Dirt, all of its subpages (like Dirt/ua) would be cleared away (like this) unless they were moved and then restored. That's been an issue on the FTB Wiki, since we want all translations to be through the interface so it can keep track of when its outdated and whatnot but we don't have the translators to move everything over to the new system. -Xbony2 (FTB Wiki Admin) (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

How to implement Sprite related modules/templates correctly?

We're having trouble with updating old and deprecated sprite modules and templates. How can I correctly implement those features, especially the "Edit Sprite"? --Alswo9628(4)ko.Admin (talk) 19:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind, moving to Directors Page. --Alswo9628(4)ko.Admin (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


Item durability Is outdated

[ https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Item_durability ] ["Armor durability is based on the armor's type (head, torso, legs, feet) and material (leather, gold, chain mail, iron, diamond). Any time you take damage, each piece of armor you are wearing loses one point of durability."]

https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Item_durability. The more damage you take, the more durability armor loses. I don't have enough info to update this, so I'm requesting an edit through here if someone can. I might edit it using https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/Armor#Durability 's info, which I actually just found

ぶらいあん (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Suggest using the article's talk page for this as it isn't an admin-specific issue. --Pcj (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The server has an internal image cache of 10 minutes.

Can someone confirm if the server still has an internal image cache of 10 minutes? It is currently stated at File:DataValuesBeta.png – ITechieGamertce 11:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

It's probably more a day or two, but there's been a huge image infrastructure change recently, so it might be totally different. MajrTalk
Contribs
03:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
When I updated File:DataValuesBeta.png, thr updated version appeared as soon as the page loaded, however, I notice that some images didn't show the updated version until I purged them. – ITechieGamertce 13:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

New page for requesting page protection

Hello! I think to create a new page for requesting page protection, and this page may be used to only request page protection, like Wikipedia's requests for page protection page. Psl85 Talk 18:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

 Support. I've been thinking the same thing. The wiki is continuously growing, and pages keep getting vandalized. A lot of the time, requests for page protection aren't noticed for many weeks. --Orange Glazed TerracottaMadminecrafter12TalkContributions 19:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! I will go and create this page! Psl85 Talk 19:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
If these requests are pushed to a single dedicated page, it'd provide a greater overview and the related people will be able to find stuff quicker. Especially if that page also gets sorted in some convenient way. But then at least one admin should keep an eye on it, or it won't do anything. Sadly the page deletion system currently doesn't work like that yet... – Jack McKalling [ User page Talk page Contributions ] 19:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Okay! Psl85 Talk 20:03, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
This probably should have been discussed more before being implemented, but uh, okay. -Xbony2 (GRASP) (FTB Wiki Admin) (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion, such a page should be created by the administrators themselves once there has been enough discussion, not by any user who does not have the responsibility to monitor changes made on the page. TheLOLxd2 (talk) 23:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm skeptical of this. In particular, it seems to me that the solution to one page not being monitored enough by admins is not to create an additional page that also has to be monitored by admins. Additionally, a discussion which is less than a day old, in which no admins commented, is not sufficient to determine that a new admin process page is wanted or needed. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 15:15, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Then what's your opinion on adding a new section to the admin noticeboard instead, for requests like page protection, urgent page deletion, user blocking etc? If you think a separate page is undesirable for this. Either one section for all acceptable admin action requests or one section for each type of request. Because this content is not relevant to regular editors unless they're making a request themselves, and isolating general issues from the common requests makes it easier for them to find what they're really looking for on a page that has the tendency to grow huge like this one. – Jack McKalling [ User page Talk page Contributions ] 20:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't have a solution. The problem is (lack of) admin attention, and the solution to that is not (and will never be) to further fragment that attention.
This page's primary purpose is to bring issues to the attention of admins; ensuring non-admins can find things relevant to them isn't a primary goal (though it will inevitably align pretty closely with keeping the page usable for admins as well). I've explained in the past that there's no reason for the page to grow unmanageably big when anyone can archive old/resolved discussions, so I don't view that as a valid problem here. ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

User warnings to this wiki?

Hello. I uploaded newly a stop hand icon to use in some user warnings to this wiki. These user warnings can then be used to warn vandals, spammers, disruptive editors, and to use to warn vandals for risking being blocked from editing.--Psl85 Talk 17:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

We already have several warning templates: {{Uw-delete}}, {{Uw-test}}, and {{Uw-vandalism}}. -- Orthotopetalk 21:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
For a week ago, I have created four new templates, {{User warning1}}, {{User warning2}}, {{User warning3}} and {{User warning4}} to warn users of all bad actions. And a {{blocked}} template, to put on blocked users talk pages, and {{unblock}} template. Two more templates is needed, {{unblock reviewed}} (to use on declined unblock requests) and {{unblocked}} (to use on accepted unblock requests), because I want Wikipedia's warning system.
Please start also a warning system, and I will shortly create a blocking policy, warning policy, and vandalism policy pages, and please add a notice to let all users to request page protection in the requests for page protection page instead of on the administrators' noticeboard.--Psl85 Talk Contribs 18:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Again, we already have templates for this, which aren't used very often as it is; how will having more templates improve things? This wiki is one-thousandth the size of Wikipedia (counting by pages or edits), so we don't have a need for some of the formal procedures they do. -- Orthotopetalk 01:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
While I think the user warning system of Wikipedia is a good idea, I think on this particular wiki, it's easy enough for admins to keep track of the relative amounts of vandalism by users. On average it seems that there are about 10 cases of vandalism a day on this wiki, but on Wikipedia, I've sometimes noticed about 15 per minute (that's no exaggeration; also that's 21600 vandalism edits a day if I did the math correctly, though I probably didn't :)). There hasn't really been any recent circumstances where a user has continuously vandalized pages and did not get blocked appropriately after a few days.--Orange Glazed Terracotta Madminecrafter12TC 01:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Rename of 1.2.13/14 build x pages into 1.3 build x

I'm wondering why it's been chosen to rename pages like "Bedrock_Edition_1.3_build_1" (which has the actual build number 1.2.13.5 ) into "Bedrock Edition 1.3 build 2"? It doesn't reflect anything related to the actual build number reported by minecraft.net changelogs, nor the actual build number of the actual applications. The same pattern has been done throughout the entire 1.2.13 and 1.2.14 series. Holroy (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Although I personally am not sure if renaming it like this is the best option, Ff98sha had done this because of this tweet, and it was discussed at User talk:Ff98sha#1.3 builds don't exist (yet), so if you want to join that discussion you're welcome to.--Orange Glazed Terracotta Madminecrafter12TC 22:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
The new name is not referred to neither on Minecraft sites, like https://aka.ms/mcchangelogs, nor within the game files, so it's a strange rename. I've added some further notes in the mentioned user talk. --Holroy (talk) 23:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Deleting by replacing content and moving without redirect

MinecraftPhotos4U (contribs) is currently performing a large number of edits to old Pocket Edition Alpha pages [edit: and other pages] marked for deletion, replacing their content with #REDIRECTs and moving them to completely unrelated pages. Is this an acceptable technique? It seems to me it hides or distorts the wiki history and is very confusing. – Auldrick (talk · contribs) 18:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Advertisement