Minecraft Wiki
No edit summary
 
(→‎Irrelevant Edit: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
== Unnamed section ==
{{Stub}}
 
  +
What was the purpose of changing out the image of a table for an actual table on the page? It only seems to make it easier to edit and is generally less friendly on the eyes compared to the simple, more compact, and color-coded image. -[[User:KinoftheFlames|KinoftheFlames]] 04:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
{{Future}}
 
{{Block
 
|image=Enchantment Table.png
 
|type=Solid Block
 
|gravity=No
 
|dirt=No
 
|transparent=Yes
 
|light=No
 
|tool= Wooden Pickaxe
 
|stackable=Yes
 
|firstver=Beta 1.9 Pre-release 3
 
|data=116
 
}}
 
   
  +
I noticed in the table there is no entry for some newer blocks, but the one most obviously missing is redstone.
The '''Enchantment Table''' is a block.<ref>http://twitter.com/notch/status/119797462222385152</ref> Notch has stated that [[Enchanting]] will work in three stages and the effects will be based on the spell you choose, but a random loot element will be included as well.<ref>http://twitter.com/notch/status/119799522170912768</ref><ref>http://twitter.com/notch/status/119803746376089600</ref> Each spell will cost the player experience levels but in turn allow the player to enchant armor and swords so that they will be more powerful, last longer, and have more of a glossy look.
 
  +
A suggestion that I thought of is that the tool efficiency may want to be split by the type of tool used to provide more information since a diamond shovel might as well be hands when cutting a tree or mining. --[[User:NeoNMD|NeoNMD]] 13:20, 4 September 2010 (CDT)
   
  +
== Durability? ==
It will enchant [[wood]], [[stone]], [[iron]], [[gold]], and [[diamond]] [[swords]], [[shovels]], [[pickaxes]], and [[axes]], as well as all [[armor]]. The [[hoe]], [[shears]], [[bow]], [[fishing rod]] and [[flint and steel]] are not enchantable.
 
   
  +
Where is the durability equation at? I though I had seen that in here somewhere before.
If the table is surrounded by [[Bookshelves]], various particles shaped like glyphs from the enchantment interface fly into the [[book]] part of the table only when the player is nearby. According to Jeb, having [[Bookshelves]] near an enchantment table will increase the potency of enchantments.<ref>http://twitter.com/jeb_/status/123663863018299393</ref>
 
   
  +
Something like 2^n+1 where n changes with material?
In 1.9 Pre-Release 3 and 4, the Enchantment Table can be destroyed with a single punch, but only drops as a block if it is harvested with a [[Pickaxe]].
 
  +
I remember wood gets 33 uses, I just measured stone at 65 uses, and I recall diamond being 1025 uses (though I'm not about to test that ;D) --[[User:Ibutton77|Ibutton77]] 09:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 
   
  +
:It's in [[Crafting]]. –[[User:Ultradude25|<span style="color:#07E" title="Minepedia SysOp">ultradude25</span>]] <sup>([[User:Ultradude25/t|<span style="color:#081" title="Talk">T</span>]]|[[User:Ultradude25/c|<span style="color:#800" title="Contributions">C</span>]])</sup> 10:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
== Crafting ==
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
!Ingredients
 
!Input » Output
 
|-
 
! [[Book]] +<br>[[Diamond (Gem)|Diamond]] +<br>[[Obsidian]]
 
|{{Grid/Crafting Table
 
|B1=Book
 
|A2=Diamond (Gem)|B2=Obsidian|C2=Diamond (Gem)
 
|A3=Obsidian|B3=Obsidian|C3=Obsidian
 
|Output=Enchantment Table
 
}}
 
|}
 
   
== History ==
+
== TNT ==
Notch first tweeted about the Enchantment Table on September 30th 2011.<ref>http://twitter.com/notch/status/119799522170912768</ref><ref>http://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/kwjnt/notch_twitter_its_an_enchantment_table/c2nt0a5</ref>
 
   
  +
What blocks does TNT yeild? Just thought that relevent. <small>&ndash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Megadog|Megadog]] <sup>([[User talk:Megadog|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Megadog|Contribs]])</sup> . Please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki><nowiki>~~</nowiki>!</small>
== Enchantments ==
 
  +
:I'm not sure, but I know that TNT has a chance of preventing block drops. I blew up some coal ore and I didn't get very much coal. <small>&ndash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:PurpleKiwi|PurpleKiwi]] <sup>([[User talk:PurpleKiwi|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/PurpleKiwi|Contribs]])</sup> . Please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki><nowiki>~~</nowiki>!</small>
{{main|Enchanting}}
 
  +
::same goes for creeper explosions. if they blow up your creations, you dont get all blocks back. i would say something between 33% and 50% is destroyed, but that may just be me. --[[User:BlueLegion|BlueLegion]] 12:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
Enchantment names are randomly constructed from a long list of words. Three to five words are chosen from the list and appended to each other, creating the enchantment name. Any name can be chosen for any item. Note that the names are not actually saved with the item, they are only displayed in the Enchantment Table interface, albeit with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commander_Keen#Standard_Galactic_Alphabet Standard Galactic Alphabet].
 
  +
:I was about to edit the page with TNT with information on this. I've been using a lot of TNT, and in my experience, any ore that produces a block you can place will be destroyed, but the others will not. So iron ore and gold ore will be lost in the blast, but coal, redstone and diamond will not. This needs more experiments for verification, though. If you have more knowledge, please add it to the TNT page. [[User:LTK 70|LTK 70]] 17:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
As of Minecraft Beta 1.9 Pre 4 some enchantments that are possible are: Bane Of Arthropods,(strong against spiders), Smite I, Sharpness I, and Knockback I. All enchantments have an I , II, III, IV, and V model too. It is shown in the coding that the enchantment tiers go up to X, but nothing above V has been speculated. A normal table can only enchant up to level 5 but it is known that adding bookshelves will increase it to higher levels. The highest level has not been confirmed but currently the highest seen is 50. A sword that is enchanted has a particle effect when attacking a mob. This is not true for all enchantments, however.
 
   
  +
:::Actually, I think that 33% of blocks destroyed by explosions are dropped as resources. It was probably just luck that all your iron and gold was destroyed and everything else was spared. [[User:Ary31415|Ary31415]] 15:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
== Gallery ==
 
<gallery>
 
File:YA2DD.png|Enchantment Table enchanting grid
 
File:Enchant.jpg|Enchanted Armor and Sword
 
File:Enchanting grid.png|Blank enchanting grid
 
File:2011-10-06 17.57.38.png|The enchantment table receiving knowledge from nearby bookshelves.
 
File:Enchant_Table_with_closed_book.jpg|The enchantment table with the book closed and rotating.
 
File:EnchantmentProgress.png|Some possible upcoming enchantments, as posted by Jeb.
 
File:2011-10-15_18.11.15.png|The highest known enchantment level, level 50.
 
</gallery>
 
   
== Bugs ==
+
== Recipes section ==
* Enchantments are disabled/do not work in Beta 1.9 Pre-release 3's SMP. If a player attempts to enchant an item, it will appear enchanted for the client, but will update with the unenchanted status once the player logs out and then back in again.
 
* If you shift click an item into the enchanting table the game will crash. (In both creative and survival modes)
 
* The enchantment Table Block breaks with a single punch with an empty hand. This is most likely not intended since it is made of obsidian.
 
* Breaking the enchantment Table Block by hand seems to destroy it permanently, losing the diamonds and obsidian needed to make it.
 
* When playing on a Beta 1.9 pre-release 3 server, if an enchantment table is broken and replaced with another [[Tile Entity]] block, the enchantment table's book will continue to be rendered on the client, and activating it will crash the client.
 
* When holding an enchanted item above the book graphic in the enchantment GUI, the "glimmer" of the item reacts to it, showing the glimmer in a square, in the empty space around the item.<!--ohgod please reword. this is horrible and I'm not good with rewording. this was the best way I could say it --Kizzycocoa /-->
 
   
  +
Should this just be a link to the tools section on the crafting page? Doesn't make sense to have the same information presented twice on two different pages, especially as new recipes are added in future updates. It could lead to one page being more up to date than the other.
== Trivia ==
 
  +
:What? That doesn't even make sense. How can one page possibly get out of sync from the other? –[[User:Ultradude25|<span style="color:#07E" title="Minepedia SysOp">ultradude25</span>]] <sup>([[User:Ultradude25/t|<span style="color:#081" title="Talk">T</span>]]|[[User:Ultradude25/c|<span style="color:#800" title="Contributions">C</span>]])</sup> 23:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
* Notch commented on Reddit "Oh, it's more magical than that! It automatically opens up and turns towards players who get close to it. When nobody is around, the book is closed and spins slowly."<ref>http://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/kwjnt/notch_twitter_its_an_enchantment_table/c2nsx1l</ref>
 
  +
::There's a crafting section on the tools page, and it's repeated on the crafting page. If a new tool is introduced into the game, both pages need to be updated, leading to unnecessary work and potential for error to creep in. They can get out of sync because each page is edited separately. [[User:DannyF1966|DannyF1966]] 00:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
* Notch comments on other book animations. "Yes, the pages flip randomly every now and then."<ref>http://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/kwjnt/notch_twitter_its_an_enchantment_table/c2nt311</ref>
 
  +
:::The only way that would be possible is if you actually put the table on the page, which is why we don't do that... –[[User:Ultradude25|<span style="color:#07E" title="Minepedia SysOp">ultradude25</span>]] <sup>([[User:Ultradude25/t|<span style="color:#081" title="Talk">T</span>]]|[[User:Ultradude25/c|<span style="color:#800" title="Contributions">C</span>]])</sup> 01:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
* On October 1st 2011, Notch tweeted an image of the enchantment screen, with enchantments written in the [[wikipedia:Commander Keen#Standard Galactic Alphabet|Standard Galactic Alphabet]].<ref>http://twitter.com/notch/status/120207632228298753</ref> The first enchantment translates onto "Well Played Internets You Are Good", the second translated into "These Names Will Be Random And Confusing", and the third translates to "Each Spell Costs Experience Levels". The Standard Galactic Alphabet or SGA was originally created by Tom Hall for use in the ''[[wikipedia:Commander Keen|Commander Keen]]'' series of computer games.<ref>http://www.omniglot.com/writing/sga.htm</ref>
 
*Although the bottom texture would at first glance appear to be the obsidian texture, it is in fact slightly different.
 
   
== References ==
+
== Redstone not listed ==
<references/>
 
   
  +
In the table where mining times for different blocks are listed, Redstone is missing. If someone has this data, please add it for completeness' sake <small>&ndash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:LTK 70|LTK 70]] <sup>([[User talk:LTK 70|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/LTK 70|Contribs]])</sup> . Please sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki><nowiki>~~</nowiki>!</small>
== External links ==
 
*[http://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/kwjnt/notch_twitter_its_an_enchantment_table/ Minecraft Reddit: Notch twitter - It's an enchantment table]
 
   
  +
Well, if you want to be technical, I might as well mention that the blocks from the [[Nether]] isn't there, which would be very useful. [[User:99seconds|99seconds]] 00:23, 17 November 2010 (CST)
{{Blocks}}
 
   
  +
:Well you could have signed it for him :D --[[User:Scykei|Scykei]] 07:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
[[de:Zaubertisch]]
 
  +
[[fr:Table d'enchantement]]
 
  +
:*I started filling this in but it didn't look any good with "? secs". I'm not far enough yet to test things like diamond tools, but how do you get the #secs down to 2dp?? The Swords list can be expanded too, see [[:File:Use-sword.png#filelinks]] --[[User:ChewChew|ChewChew]] 12:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
[[ru:Стол зачаровывания]]
 
  +
::A simple trick to get accurate numbers is to use a map editor or /give to create a large number of the blocks in question. You chop through them, counting the time to get through them; When done, you divide the time by the number of blocks. The more blocks you test, the more accurate the time. Assuming a counting human to be accurate to within 2 seconds, you'd need to cut through 100 blocks for a .02 second margin of error. Blocks should be placed in a 2x50 strip, and attacked end to end. If you synch your counting to a counter running in the background, you can reduce the variance by about half thus requiring fewer blocks.[[User:Ghost2|Ghost2]] 05:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
  +
:::I'll go ahead and do this right now, expect the results within a couple of hours. [[User:Alphap|Alphap]] 01:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Other uses for swords (or other tools) ==
  +
  +
It is worth mentioning that a Diamond Sword can be used to quickly pick up minecarts. It's fast (1 hit) and does not damage the sword, making it the perfect tool for this job. Does anyone know if this also applies to other swords? Also, what other uses the other tools have? --[[User:CrazyTerabyte|CrazyTerabyte]] 03:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
  +
:All swords instantly destroy minecarts.--[[User:PurpleKiwi|PurpleKiwi]] 03:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Harvesting data out of date ==
  +
  +
Swords can be used to harvest more blocks than simply glass and leaves faster, but nowehere is this mentioned. It's also strange to note that axes are still listed as the correct tool to use on a workbench even though it does nothing to speed up the harvesting process, while a sword does. Could we get some data on this, please? [[User:DoomRater|DoomRater]] 21:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Saddle = tool? ==
  +
  +
Does the saddle count as a tool?
  +
[[User:Deathgleaner|Deathgleaner]] 21:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
  +
:I'd say yes, since it has a unique use. [[User:Alphap|Alphap]] 02:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
Mostly an easter egg in my opinion, tools should be useful. [[User:Calinou|Calinou]] 17:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Irrelevant Edit ==
  +
  +
Sorry, I confused the original page with the Japanese page when I edited "Tools" on 5 December 2011, and I've not noticed. I'll be extra careful not to do that again. [[User:Lmj|Lmj]] 12:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:38, 7 December 2011

Unnamed section

What was the purpose of changing out the image of a table for an actual table on the page? It only seems to make it easier to edit and is generally less friendly on the eyes compared to the simple, more compact, and color-coded image. -KinoftheFlames 04:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

I noticed in the table there is no entry for some newer blocks, but the one most obviously missing is redstone. A suggestion that I thought of is that the tool efficiency may want to be split by the type of tool used to provide more information since a diamond shovel might as well be hands when cutting a tree or mining. --NeoNMD 13:20, 4 September 2010 (CDT)

Durability?

Where is the durability equation at? I though I had seen that in here somewhere before.

Something like 2^n+1 where n changes with material? I remember wood gets 33 uses, I just measured stone at 65 uses, and I recall diamond being 1025 uses (though I'm not about to test that ;D) --Ibutton77 09:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

It's in Crafting. –ultradude25 (T|C) 10:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

TNT

What blocks does TNT yeild? Just thought that relevent. –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Megadog (Talk|Contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

I'm not sure, but I know that TNT has a chance of preventing block drops. I blew up some coal ore and I didn't get very much coal. –The preceding unsigned comment was added by PurpleKiwi (Talk|Contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
same goes for creeper explosions. if they blow up your creations, you dont get all blocks back. i would say something between 33% and 50% is destroyed, but that may just be me. --BlueLegion 12:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I was about to edit the page with TNT with information on this. I've been using a lot of TNT, and in my experience, any ore that produces a block you can place will be destroyed, but the others will not. So iron ore and gold ore will be lost in the blast, but coal, redstone and diamond will not. This needs more experiments for verification, though. If you have more knowledge, please add it to the TNT page. LTK 70 17:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I think that 33% of blocks destroyed by explosions are dropped as resources. It was probably just luck that all your iron and gold was destroyed and everything else was spared. Ary31415 15:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Recipes section

Should this just be a link to the tools section on the crafting page? Doesn't make sense to have the same information presented twice on two different pages, especially as new recipes are added in future updates. It could lead to one page being more up to date than the other.

What? That doesn't even make sense. How can one page possibly get out of sync from the other? –ultradude25 (T|C) 23:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
There's a crafting section on the tools page, and it's repeated on the crafting page. If a new tool is introduced into the game, both pages need to be updated, leading to unnecessary work and potential for error to creep in. They can get out of sync because each page is edited separately. DannyF1966 00:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
The only way that would be possible is if you actually put the table on the page, which is why we don't do that... –ultradude25 (T|C) 01:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Redstone not listed

In the table where mining times for different blocks are listed, Redstone is missing. If someone has this data, please add it for completeness' sake –The preceding unsigned comment was added by LTK 70 (Talk|Contribs) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Well, if you want to be technical, I might as well mention that the blocks from the Nether isn't there, which would be very useful. 99seconds 00:23, 17 November 2010 (CST)

Well you could have signed it for him :D --Scykei 07:12, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
  • I started filling this in but it didn't look any good with "? secs". I'm not far enough yet to test things like diamond tools, but how do you get the #secs down to 2dp?? The Swords list can be expanded too, see File:Use-sword.png#filelinks --ChewChew 12:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
A simple trick to get accurate numbers is to use a map editor or /give to create a large number of the blocks in question. You chop through them, counting the time to get through them; When done, you divide the time by the number of blocks. The more blocks you test, the more accurate the time. Assuming a counting human to be accurate to within 2 seconds, you'd need to cut through 100 blocks for a .02 second margin of error. Blocks should be placed in a 2x50 strip, and attacked end to end. If you synch your counting to a counter running in the background, you can reduce the variance by about half thus requiring fewer blocks.Ghost2 05:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and do this right now, expect the results within a couple of hours. Alphap 01:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Other uses for swords (or other tools)

It is worth mentioning that a Diamond Sword can be used to quickly pick up minecarts. It's fast (1 hit) and does not damage the sword, making it the perfect tool for this job. Does anyone know if this also applies to other swords? Also, what other uses the other tools have? --CrazyTerabyte 03:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

All swords instantly destroy minecarts.--PurpleKiwi 03:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Harvesting data out of date

Swords can be used to harvest more blocks than simply glass and leaves faster, but nowehere is this mentioned. It's also strange to note that axes are still listed as the correct tool to use on a workbench even though it does nothing to speed up the harvesting process, while a sword does. Could we get some data on this, please? DoomRater 21:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Saddle = tool?

Does the saddle count as a tool? Deathgleaner 21:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I'd say yes, since it has a unique use. Alphap 02:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Mostly an easter egg in my opinion, tools should be useful. Calinou 17:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Irrelevant Edit

Sorry, I confused the original page with the Japanese page when I edited "Tools" on 5 December 2011, and I've not noticed. I'll be extra careful not to do that again. Lmj 12:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)