Talk:Texture Update

Opinions on the page so far
could i possibly get your opinion on this page, so far i think it looks ok but i just want to be sure before i continue. jjlr (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Not sure why you want my opinion, but okay. Personally, I would reduce the number of cycling blocks, as it can be distracting. The crops are fine, but I'd split up the rest of the current blocks. Maybe add sub-sections for some of the more lengthy categories of similar blocks, such as (cobble)stone (brick) variants, or (red) sand(stone) variants. Also, I'd probably do this to make the crops growth cycle match better, instead of having wheat go through one cycle, while the other crops go through two:


 * - Princess Nightmoon (Splash Potions.gifLingering Potions.gif) 09:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * you were the only person i could tell was online, and as far as splitting the blocks up into there own areas go i was avoiding that because i thought it might make the page to long, but i can try it and see. And i do agree the crops look better that way so i will be changing it, thank you. jjlr (talk) 09:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Any better now? jjlr (talk) 09:45, 13 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Looks good so far. Lit and unlit redstone lamp makes sense for animation, and the same would go for other blocks that toggle between two versions. Some names could use slight adjustments, but don't worry about that for now, it's not that important. - Princess Nightmoon (Splash Potions.gifLingering Potions.gif) 10:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Jappa
Should the fact that Jappa is doing the textures be added to the infobox? or possibly the opening paragraph? jjlr (talk) 10:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's worth mentioning in the opening paragraph, yes. - Princess Nightmoon (Splash Potions.gifLingering Potions.gif) 11:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)