User talk:BDJP007301

Happy birthday!
Sorry for not commenting on July 28 but happy birthday! TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) 19:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Block duration of Logomansbutcher1138
I was reviewing Category:Requests for unblock and came across your block of User:Logomansbutcher1138. Isn't indef a bit harsh? Aside from the user's dislike of the taxicab distance article I wrote, the main space contributions have been OK. He could be a good editor I think. Would you consider a reduction in the duration? Amatulic (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * They are only blocked from Taxicab distance. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) 03:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that in the block log. Thanks. Amatulic (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Minecraft Legends: Pigmadilo
Good evening. I would like to know what criteria from MY design model, I repeat, my design model of character gallery and page format that has been developed and aproved lately, does the page mentioned in the title of this topic meet? A new mob anounced with an official name and description and you dare, I repeat, you dare to simply delete information from the main source of minecraft info? You better have a logical explanation for you actions. The name of the page follows the format minecraft dungeons follows for mobs. Name of the game, 2 dots, mob name. What is the matter? Don't delete the page, change it to whatever criteria you want. Deleting work and research is not only absurd but extremely unpolite and downright wrong. I await response. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Clearly you did not read over MCW:NOTABILITY. I also will not take any passive-aggressive threats. BDJP (t 23:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not threatening you. Also the information should be delivered NOW. As more features are anounced we expand upon it. We don't waste time to add info even if it is little. You know it took me time to make that page. Also how do you expect me to react wen you suddenly delete my work over your absurd policies? Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It can wait. We did not put info on MCD into its own namespace until a month out from release at the earliest. You can put the information in your own userspace (i.e. "User:Witheremperor2006/Pigmadilo") and it will be moved to the MCL namespace when it is ready. BDJP (t 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I realise that in the momment of frustration my attitude was not the best. I still disagree with that policy, however, you are just doing your job and I believe at the best you can do it. That is a respectable position and I acted wrong. Again I still believe my argument is valid, however my attittude towards you was extremely unpolite and inconvenient to say the least. I apologise for my behavior as you are just a person like me who loves this game and it's communitty. You did not deserve what I put you through. If you could ever forgive me. Again my apologies. Much obliged for your patience and information delivered. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

"no, this one isn't fine!"
re: reverts on https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/File:Mhdc_pulse_extender.png The version uploaded by Goro488 is missing on crucial redstone dust connecting the two counter/clock parts. -> It isn't fine because it doesn't work without that one piece of RSD. Nilbadimo (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Its updated to the new textures. Everything else is irrelevant unless a newer version is uploaded. BDJP (t 13:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * BTW, isn't it bit over-exaggerated? The Style guide mentions the "vanilla textures", which are things Minecraft ships with. It should be more clarified, that is true, but reverting it just because it uses "older textures" is really not the best reason. --TreeIsLife (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @BDJP007301 - How can the functionality of a redstone circuit not be relevant? Goro488's circuit/image doesn't work. @TreeIsLife - My upload comment was wrong. I'm not using vanilla textures (I think) but Vanillatweaks.net textures for some redstone stuff. @ALL - BTW, where can I suggest to allow such minimal texture mods? Eg. redstone dust looks much more like in schematics. Nilbadimo (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Per MCW:IMAGES, the image must have default textures; any texture modification is not allowed. BDJP (t 14:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe just build the other one but with the official textures. I can do that if you want if I find a tutorial.Witheremperor2006 (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I made a build of this today and can upload an image if need be. If no one else does by the time I get up tomorrow, I'll upload it then. - AD OffKilter (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Unauthorized mass file deletion
Good evening. I would like to understand why did you delete the placeholder renders that took time to make has acurate to the game as possible until I or someone else upload the actual ones. For years this gamepedia has used placeholders. In fact, nobody gets confused since the renders have a legal disclaimer and license. I can see that by previous conflicts from other people, that you have a reputation for deleting files and making the gamepedia look worse than before. You also seem to lack basic un derstanding of the game and pages involved in current edits. You cannot do what you do. The files will be uploaded again. If you delete them I will see no other option but to report you. Enough is enough. I have used placeholder renders far less acurate than the recent ones and they are still in the gamepedia to this day. So have other users as well. I hope you nget the message for once. I am not your enemy. I love this game as much as you possibly do. Show some respect and humbleness my friend. Much obliged. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * In one of your edit summaries, you basically admitted that the model "sells the idea quite well", which basically admits that it was fanmade. We do not use any fan-made renders in articles, and all textures included must be from the original game. Please read over MCW:IMAGES and MCW:RENDER before uploading any more files to this wiki. BDJP (t 14:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Who said the textures are not official. The only thing that makes them diffrent is the glowing on their eyes wich was aded by me. Every render that has glowing was fanmade in that sense. Hence why it sells the idea. If everyone is lasy enough not to add the actual renders than, until I do so wich I've been extracting more and more files from the game lately, than the placeholders can tell people basically what they look like. If you played Ancient Hunts than you know the renders are extremely similar, I was honest to say they are just PLACEHOLDERS. Also if you don't agree just talk to me man, do not delete work because that's just wrong. I apologised for being rude in my previous talk with you and you ghosted me. Please man that's not very nice. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 14:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * First of all, I have said that I will make real the ancient mobs renderings LATER. Secondly, without taking evidence or taking screenshots in the game, You just roughly changed renders to purple and gold, which is disrespectful to the game and render creators, and will also mislead the mod creators and players. You don't understand how many props.txt and json files and screenshots we referred to, just wanna made the renders more closer to the game. For the placeholders, In-game screenshots are the best placeholders for wiki and players. As for how to make better renderings, you can refer to the Minecraft Wiki:Minecraft Dungeons standardized views page, we are planning to make a blender setup file that newbies can use, I highly recommend you to read this article more if you have time. For the last question, our wiki is not recognized by Microsoft because there are too many such low-quality imitations like this. It's up to you to leave or stay in wiki. Have a nice day. Alan (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2022 (UTC)