User talk:Timrem

You know what to do.

KVKConsultancy
Thanks for pointing out what you did.. The points you made where useful in that it was important to correct me in getting that users name mixed up.

I have good friends here, and I don't wish to make anything but friends. I felt your contribution to the debate was valid in that you identified a mistake in my argument.

I read your comment in Anoymous712's profile.... I need to be clear. Whilst I do have a tool / mod I work on, promoting my mod is not what I care about here. I am open about having a mod, and in how I contribute, it just sometimes feels like not everyone is and its hard sometimes to tell the spammers from the people.

Anyway, just wanted to say thanks! Hope you get the right overall impression in the end. KVKConsultancy 23:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and one final note.. for all you claim I insulted other users, you definitely insulted me (see the post you made on Anoymous712's wall. http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/User_talk:Anoymous712). All the best to you. KVKConsultancy 23:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you didn't intent to offend, and that it was indeed just a misunderstanding. But when Anoymous712 came to you to explain that s/he took your comments as insulting, your response was a backhanded apology and an attempt to discredit him/her. I feel completely justified in making those comments at the time, as they were a true reflection of how I viewed your actions. I'm glad you responded in a levelheaded and courteous manner, and I apologize that I may have made a rash judgement of you. Hopefully we can put this behind us now, and focus on making this wiki the best it can be. Happy editing! --timrem 00:11, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I can't entirely agree with your summary there, but I see how it might have looked that way (the apology was admittedly at the end or a an upset "rant", but it was genuine and felt and in the first reply, as was the complaint against anoymous abusers that overpowered it. My response was inappropriate though and disproportionate and Anoymous712 took to heart something not meant for him/her and was not deserving (I am sadly used to people abusing anonimity online I sometimes forget theres still so many genuine people). I got too used to platitudes from bad people trying to get their own ways. I genuinely appreciate you pointing out my mistake with Anoymous712's name. I'm very happy to leave it there. KVKConsultancy 08:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

WAT.
^What the title said. TrollGlaDOS 04:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Never Mind.
If you Read what was here. Just Ignore it. Sorry about that. If you are reading this now, Would you mind deleting this topic? Thanks. Spencer10APSC 20:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

taking a look at some pages.
Hey Timrem! This is Spencer10APSC. I noticed that some wiki pages really need cleaning up and given answers to there marks. Here are the pages that could use yours and my checking: Wolf and creeper. There may be more but here is what I have so far. Tell me at my Talk page what you have; Found or if you want to have a look. Invite some others to look with us (Optional). So, I will have a look at those pages when I have a chance. Come with, If you are interested. Thanks. Spencer10APSC 18:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Update: Please Confirm and tell me (On my page) if your are interested or not. So I know its not "Pending". :) Spencer10APSC 19:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Re:Signature
I'm sorry about the sig, I copied my signature from Brickipedia. I have another idea for a sig I can do that won't violate any rules. 18:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Better? Dataman-logo-blue.png 18:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)