User talk:Goandgoo

creating a page but is saying automated..
creating a page but is saying An automated filter has detected that you are attempting to create a possibly unwanted page. As a new user, your action has been disallowed. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Bringdowns (talk • contribs) at 6:33, 04 January 2016 (UTC). Please sign your posts with

Bringdowns (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Post.
I believe my post was perfectly fine. It said my post was disallowed. --StompingEnd05 (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * What did you try to do? –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs 09:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

it said it detected bad things in my post, but i think it was perfectly fine and didnt have any issue, please help. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Snipe221 (talk • contribs) at 0:02, 27 January 2016 (UTC). Please sign your posts with
 * Trying to create pages for unsubstantiated – and most likely false – rumors is not "perfectly fine". -- Orthotopetalk 01:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

X-Post from archieve-4: "Beta 1.6 Test Build 3 Screenshots"
Here is some screenshots of the test build running, the server test build running and some file information on both of them.

–Preceding unsigned comment was added by St3in3rS (talk • contribs) at 04:55, 10 July 2015‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with


 * Mojang hosts their files under https://s3.amazonaws.com/Minecraft.Download/, as can be seen at https://mojang.com/2013/07/minecraft-the-horse-update/ . This version is under https://s3.amazonaws.com/MinecraftDownload ; note the missing period. I'm not aware of an easy way to see who owns AWS instances, so it's unclear if this is another Mojang account, or if someone else set up an imitation. -- Orthotopetalk 19:21, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Notch/Mojang hosted the old launcher updates and the classic that Was displayed on minecraft.net at s3 MinecraftDownload. It IS a Mojang account. So this is real..link and beta 1.6 isN'T the horse update... it's BETA 1.6... --Atybot (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Unless you can provide a source that such version exists, I'm still considering it a hoax. -BDJP (t 14:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)