User talk:Kanegasi/archive2

There is already another Mental Mouse 42!?!
1: What!?! That's Sucks! 2: I just made my Account as soon as I got to my Friend's place. 3: My lucky number is 42. forget the dump number! 4: but then again it could be my first Friend. P.S. but how did my account get Created anyway? that makes no scene. MentalMouseGames! 23:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Edit: Please Reply!


 * You don't remember creating your account? How did you login then?  23:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * No I mean If there is already a MentalMouse42, Why did it not tell me to type another name? MentalMouseGames! 23:35, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Because that user is known as simply "Mental Mouse" here on the wiki. The odd coincidence I'm seeing is that "MentalMouse42" is HIS Minecraft account name and forum name.  23:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, but should I make a new Account, or change my user name? Cuss I do not want to get in trouble you know? MentalMouseGames! 23:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You're not in trouble lol. I just found it odd and at first thought it was trickery. Welcome to the wiki, Mr. Doppelganger.  23:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank the lord! P.S. I don't know what a Doppelganger is. I am not cool.:P MentalMouseGames! 23:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * BTW, I just hope the other Mental Mouse does not get mad. That would be embarrassing. :$ MentalMouseGames! 23:45, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello... yeah, my usual "playtime" nick is "Mental Mouse" in whatever format is permitted (spaces, caps, etc.).  When I hit Minecraft.com, that had been taken (burdens of being a late adopter ;-) ) so I needed a suffix.  I'm a Douglas Adams fan, so....   But here on the Wiki, the base name "Mental Mouse" hadn't been taken, so I just used that.  If you actually got a Minecraft or Mojang account with MentalMouse42, that's more mysterious.  I'm not mad, it's just one of those awkward things.  I've been editing here since (checks) May 2012, so I'm not inclined to change my nick here.  If you absolutely have to keep the nick MentalMouse42 or similar, I can put a disambiguation note on my user page (and you should do likewise), but I'm pretty sure people would still get confused.   --Mental Mouse 23:53, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

dop·pel·gäng·er noun \ˈdä-pəl-ˌgaŋ-ər, -ˌgeŋ-, ˌdä-pəl-ˈ\ 1. double 2. alter ego 3. a person who has the same name as another 23:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * OH Okay. Still Sorry Though. MentalMouseGames! 00:03, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Ya, I did not know you were around Ether. Glad you are not mad ether. Plus My Friend is only 10 And is not very familiar with WIkis. (To be honest, I am not ether). But Ya, Glad this is sorted out. Have a good day blokes. PizzaGuy1000 00:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * My suggestion would be for you to register the name MentalMouseGames and use that, since you're already using that for a sig, and (I just checked) it's not taken. Still warrants a disambiguation note for both of us, but it should be a little easier on people.  --Mental Mouse 00:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You don't have to be sorry. Welcome to the wiki anyways, both of you. :)  00:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Wiki talk page
Why did you delete my comment? The problem is still happening. --Droideka30 21:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * As linked in my edit summaries for both posts you did, it was moved to Minecraft Wiki talk:Community portal where general wiki topics go.  23:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Ok. I will join the discussion there. --Droideka30 00:56, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Minor sig edit
Your sig is wrapped in a code tag and a span tag with a nowrap class; you can make it shorter by removing that span and adding the class to the code tag. instead of  –ultradude25 ᐸ Talk Contribs 10:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh cool. Thanks for the tip. My sig is now under 200.  21:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Ocelot change?
Why did you get rid of all the Issues in the Ocelot Issues list? Numbermaniac 08:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I guess that is a bit of a controversial edit, considering the size of that list. I've been following the work that ultradude25 and Goandgoo have been doing, and I find it to be pretty neat. The script that ultradude25 wrote to query the official issue tracker is yet another step toward ensuring everyone properly reports bugs. While I did get rid of a lot, thinking about it, the right thing to do when the list is that big is to go through it and make sure anything that is accurate and current is reported on the tracker. The list is still there in the History, so it is not lost. If you feel some of the issues should still be shown, since the tracker is reporting only two issues, feel free to bring them back and then remove them as they are reported.  09:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I am going through very systematically applying the new issues template. I am going through the order in the Blocks template, then Items etc. doing a few pages per day. I don't really think it is all that necessary to bring back the old bugs, indeed some of them were outdated by quite a few versions. The problem is I don't think people will actually bother to test the old bugs to see whether or not they work (which is why old bugs were left standing for ages).
 * Also, if you want to see some of the changes which have been made to the template, visit my talk page where admin ultradude25 and I have been playing around with the new template (which I more or less suggested :P). The latest change was to separate the Computer and Pocket Edition bugs. (btw if you thought this was deja vu I posted more or less the same thing on the talk page of NPC Village –  Goandgoo ᐸ  Talk  Contribs  Edit count 10:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I saw that lol. Anyways, I'll stand back a bit on articles with a lot of issues, but more or less, almost all of them are either out-of-date or on the tracker in some form. I also think that we should have the template, or a separate list using a new template argument value, listing anything reported in the tracker that Mojang marked "Working as intended", since there is the possibility that some things in the game that someone would treat as a bug is actually not. We could even expand this argument to work with any issue status, like or, although as the age of the tracker increases, the bigger the fixed list could get, so that may not make it in articles.   11:06, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The problem I see with putting in "Working as intended" bugs is that it no longer becomes an Issues section, but rather "Issues with issues that are not issues" - in a way I think it is personally making it too complex. If someone wants to see what was fixed, what is working as inteded etc, it's probably not you're average user (most of Minecraft's players don't look at the issue tracker), but if they are really that fascinated by it, they can simply look it up in the tracker.
 * Basically, I think it's getting too complex for your average user to start to list all sorts of extra stuff to the tracker. Just my opinion, if one can convince me enough then perhaps I may sway sides... –   Goandgoo ᐸ  Talk  Contribs  Edit count 11:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)