User talk:LauraFi/Archive 2

{| style="width: 100%; border: 4px ridge #DDDDDD; background: #000000; border-radius: 13px;" {| style="width: 100%; border: 4px ridge #402489; background: #ffffff; border-radius: 10px; padding: 6px; border-spacing: 5px;" background:-moz-linear-gradient(top, #4b26ac, #2747f7 50%, #402489 100%); background:-webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, color-stop (0% #4b26ac), color-stop(50%,#2747f7), color-stop(100%,#402489 )); background:-webkit-linear-gradient(top, #4b26ac 0%, #2747f7 50%, #402489 100%); background:-o-linear-gradient(top, #4b26ac 0%, #2747f7 50%, #402489 100%); background:-ms-linear-gradient(top, #4b26ac 0%, #2747f7 50%, #402489 100%); background:linear-gradient(to bottom, #4b26ac 0%, #2747f7 50%, #402489 100%); border: 1px solid #402489; border-radius: 8px; text-align:center; padding: 3px; font-size:110%; font-variant: small-caps; box-shadow: rgba(104, 116, 120, 1) 0 0.1em 0.5em;">[ Please start new messages at the bottom of the page or click this link to add a new section. ]
 * valign="top" | <div class="plainlinks" style="background:#4b26ac;
 * valign="top" |  &spades; I hearby award this

GNU32 NEON BADGE OF

EXCELLENCE

to the user

&spades; For your tireless good work to improve this wiki and make it more clean.

--Naista2002, now NickTheRed37 (talk) 10:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Cobblestone textures.png
How did you made these 4 cobblestone blocks have textures of different versions? --Naista2002, now NickTheRed37 (talk) 14:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Use a resource pack. – LauraFi -  talk  16:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay. --Naista2002, now NickTheRed37 (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Tagging "incorrect" edits
I saw you just reverted my edits on Pocket Edition version history. They were not incorrect, the "Nether Quartz" thing isn't a PC future feature because they were implemented in 1.5, neither they are the render distance thing, the change-the-mob-spawner-with-spawn-egg thing and the flint and steel making creepers explode thing. The 512-block render distance thing and the change-the-mob-spawner-with-spawn-egg thing were implemented in 1.8, and the flint and steel making creepers explode thing was implemented about in 1.6.1 or 1.7.2 if I remember well. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * The "PC future feature" means that it was implemented first on Pocket Edition, then on PC edition. – LauraFi -  talk  02:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * What about the stone type things? NickTheRed37 removed the "PC future feature" thing and nobody did anything. Though you may wish to change "PC future feature" to "PC late feature", because people can be mislead otherwise and get confused. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 02:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I removed that probably because it was unnecessary. -- Nick the Red37 — ru.wiki moderator (talk) 07:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Glowstone Dust
Sorry for that typo on Glowstone Dust, I pressed a wrong key to end a link and didn’t notice it. – Nick the Red37 — ru.wiki moderator (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Spawning mobs with spawn eggs
For the most part, we have not been listing spawn eggs as a spawning method, as it applies to nearly every mob and they are not available in survival (see MCW:Style guide). It would be just about the same as stating "The mob can be spawned using commands and custom spawners".

– KnightMiner  (t·c) 19:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)


 * But that info should be mentioned in articles (in trivia?). – LauraFi -  talk  18:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Almost all mobs can be spawned with a spawn egg. Exceptions are jockeys of all kinds, golems, withers, and ender dragons. It is better to state that a mob cannot be spawned with a spawn egg, or they are spawned with a spawn egg not like other mobs (like in case of wither skeletons). I’m Nick</b> the</b> Red37</b>, a ru.wiki mod f.k.a. Naista2002 </b> 18:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I would go based on the standard behavior rule, basically if all mobs do it for the most part, only state exceptions, as that behavior is expected. – KnightMiner  (t·c) 18:59, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Crafting grids
Re [ this edit]. This:

is shorter (in the edit window) and causes less confusion than

Because if we set the Crafting transclusion to be in 2D format, it is easier to see which ingredient is where, easier than learning that “letter determines the column, number determines the row” metaphor. So don’t hesitate to correct that among other minor fixes. I’m Nick</b> the</b> Red37</b>, f.k.a. Naista2002 </b> 15:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Paddles
You recently edited the talk page for pocket edition mentioned features saying that paddles have not appeared yet. However, boats are finished, so why do you say no?71.35.109.25 22:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * While paddles have appeared in developer tweets, they have not appeared in a development build, thus any information not directly stated or shown is speculation. – KnightMiner  (t·c) 22:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Why unneeded?
I notice you undid my edit for nether portal blocks. Why?71.35.109.25 21:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Who would go to nether portal if he/she is looking for obsidian? – LauraFi -  talk  21:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * If they want to know about the block used to make the portal, but do not know that the block for this is obsidian.71.35.109.25 04:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * That would be improper usage of about. That template is only to be used in the case of a similar title, and no one refers to obsidian as "nether portal". If they want to know about the block that makes the nether portal frame, they can read Nether Portal. – KnightMiner  t/c 14:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Deleting redirects moved to make way for move
When them for deletion, please add a summary to the Delete call, like Redirect moved to make way for move. Thanks for attention. P. S. please don’t remove the user talk link from undo summaries. —  Agent Nick the Red37 (talk &middot; contribs) f.k.a. Naista2002 16:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Reverting moves
Generally, avoid reverting an edit more than three times, even if it is vandalism or against consensus. In the case of the vandalism, wait for the user to be blocked (and report if needed). In the case of actions against consensus, try telling the user via a talk page message, and let them know repeated action against consensus could be considered vandalism. – KnightMiner  t/c 14:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Special:Diff/814048
I wanted to do a multi-revert, but I accidentally clicked a wrong “cur” link (so I compared the vandal’s first edit with his last one instead of pre-vandal revision) and did not notice it until editing the summary. I did continue anyway since I wanted to get all vandalism reverted by myself (retrying would take some time which would be enough for some other user to revert the first edit). :) —  NickTheRed37</b> t/c (f.k.a. Naista2002) 17:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)