Talk:Mods/ComputerCraft

The "if" keyword is not a loop, it is a statement. The documentation on Lua (the two basic statements) is also not nearly enough to teach a new user to do anything with the mod. Also, there is only a render for the Computer here, even though high-quality renders can be found on the ComputerCraft website. Awsmazinggenius (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I've been inactive for while, and Blender was being pedantic. I'll try to fix these now though... Redstone_(Dust).png Lennbot Redstone_(Dust).png ( talk - contributions) 17:36, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Delete?
ComputerCraft has its own website and wiki, which is far more complete than the two pages here. Is there any reason to keep what we have, since it's better documented elsewhere? -- Orthotopetalk 01:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't see any reason to keep it. I would say replace any links to this page with links to the official wiki. – KnightMiner  (t·c) 03:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Bumping this topic. Also in favor of deletion and link replacement as mentioned by KnightMiner. --GreenStone (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)


 * If the mod has its own wiki, this page should be a soft redirect. 71.212.10.80 03:17, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree a soft redirect is relevant here, though the template did not exist at the time of my earlier comment.
 * Orthotope@undefined Am I correct the URL you are referencing is http://computercraft.info/wiki/Main_Page? If so, the soft redirect could be created soon instead of deletion (since no one seems to disagree) – KnightMiner  t/c 03:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Done, currently pointing at the root computercraft.info page, though that could be changed to the wiki if people think it’s more appropriate. — Orthotopetalk 04:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I personally think the wiki would be better, as the root page hardly documents the mod. That would raise questions of why we are simply pointing to its website change log rather then documentating it. – KnightMiner  t/c 14:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)