User talk:Goandgoo/Archive 3

Realms Tutorials
I can see your reasoning for moving the Realms tutorials to Tutorials/Minecraft Realms, but I think it prudent to keep them on the Realms page with a link on the tutorials page to their sections. The Realms page was meant to give information about Realms as well as show how to use it. Just a thought.

- Exhelah  &middot;   &middot; 05:45, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * While I agree with you that discussing how realms works on the Realms page is useful, I believe that the content was more suited to the tutorials pages. Perhaps you could ask in the community portal, I am open to change. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edit count 09:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Video pages
I have given you Wiki Guardian status. This should allow you to deal with the video pages as needed. -- Wynthyst    talk  16:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry
I don't know why, but I feel the need to apologise to you. :(

I'm sorry if my contributions have annoyed you or the other admins at all. If you want me to stop, I will. :)

EthanCentaurai (talk) 12:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * When did you ever do anything wrong? Looking at your contributions, it looks like you've contributed a lot to the wiki including reverting vandalism, helping to make it better for all who use it. There's no need to apologise to myself or any of the other admins, keep doing what you do! –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edits 12:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you. This has made me feel a lot better. :)


 * I suffer from a sensitivity complex which makes me feel like I'm in the way or like someone is angry/upset at me. I felt it very strongly after creating the 14w18a page, as though someone said "God damn it Ethan, I was about to post that!" I suppose if I really had done something wrong, I would have been reverted or banned by now. :P


 * EthanCentaurai (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)


 * If it helps at all, let me assure you that no one would have been mad if they'd been about to post that page and you beat them to the punch - and if they were, they're the one with the problem, not you. =) As Goandgoo said, your contributions so far are fine (amazing, really, hardly just fine! =D ), and you absolutely should tell your complex to go annoy someone else. XD 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Beginner's guide reversion.
Pardon me, but (1) giant mushrooms that are already spawned may be shelters of convenience, but are not a "Portable Instant Shelter", and (2) Actually growing a Giant Red Mushroom around you requires bonemeal, and this article is specifically talking about the first night, before you've even found a loose bone in the morning. --MentalMouse42 (talk) 11:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Apologies, I have reworded that phrase to make it clearer that they are shelters of convenience. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edits 12:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you, that looks much better. ETA: I did re-add the food mention, as that's darn useful.  --MentalMouse42 (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

extra space
What's with this edit? Is there any particular reason you added the extra space, or was it a mistake? —F‌enhl 03:39, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I added the extra space according to the style guide: "After references (double space) will be any applicable navigation templates, like blocks, and then any applicable categories." –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edits 00:43, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, that's what that means. I always took it to mean double as in two newlines. Perhaps that should be clarified. —F‌enhl 01:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Nextparent
Hello, good morning, I see the 1.7.2 snapshot pages are coming along nicely. I'd like to iron out a wrinkle I see possibly arising. The lead text in the 1.7.2 snapshot pages all say they are for 1.7.2, so following suit, I put the nextparent argument in the navbox to be 1.7.2. In general I like the language of it, saying it's for 1,7.2 rather than for 1.7, I think it's clear, unambiguous and consistent.

In contrast, the snapshot pages for 1.8 all say they are "for 1.8" and likewise the nextparents are 1.8 -- but what happens if 1.8 is released as 1.8.1 or something like that? Should we take the time at this stage to use variables in those instances, or wait until that should happen, or do you have any other thoughts on how the language of it can be best communicated? – Sealbudsman (Aaron) (talk) – 13:38, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes I see what you mean. However, I think it makes it a bit more confusing because you have changed the nextparent argument to be 1.7.2 (the version the snapshot is for) and the prevparent to be 1.6.4, the previous version released. I think that specifying the exact version it is released (ie changing everything to 1.8.1 should it arise) makes more sense, but I think prevparent should go to the last version. ie for all 1.7.2 snapshots should go to 1.6.4, for all 1.8 snapshots it should go to 1.7.10, for 1.7.4 snapshots should go to 1.7.2, for 1.6.4 snapshots should go to 1.6.1 etc. I think the nexparent should go to the next version, so all 1.7.2 snapshots go to 1.7.4, all 1.7.4 snapshots go to 1.7.6, etc. This way, in the version that the snapshot is actually from is only shown in the snapshot from column above, rather than in the navigation links. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edits 13:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * I see, so the 'parent' nav links will then go to previous and next version with respect to (for instance if it's a 1.7.4 snapshot) 1.7.4, so: 1.7.2 and 1.7.5. I do think that's a good way to do it.. though if I understand you, I think this means that for the 1.8 snapshot pages, the link pointing forward to 1.8 is actually redundant, and should be replaced (when the time comes) with whatever is the second 1.8 release. It wouldn't point to 1.8, or 1.8.1 (supposing that's the first release), but the one after. Does this sound right? – Sealbudsman (Aaron) (talk) – 14:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, that's right. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-1em>Talk Contribs Edits 22:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

History
Yeah.. Sorry about that. Just noticed that i had forgotten the "Official Release" part. Was going back through some to add and noticed you beat me too them Oozebull (talk) 13:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Bro i just need to know.
You know what i want, what i really really want? I wanna know what version ps4 Edition is. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.94.169.65 (talk) at 19:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC). Please sign your posts with
 * PS4 Edition, or PlayStation 4 Edition, is a recently released PlayStation 4 version of Minecraft, one of Console Editions. --–Regards, Naista2002  ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px">Talk Contribs 14:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I probably misunderstood your question. This is the link you might have needed. –Regards, Naista2002  ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px">Talk Contribs 05:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Minecraft avatar
Your avatar photo is at File:Goandgoo Minecraft Avatar.png. –Regards, Naista2002  ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px">Talk Contribs  16:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Is there anything you want me to help with?
Btw: I didn't see a list of known bugs in the pocket edition page

Mining table, FYI
It looks pretty awful for people without maximized browsers on widescreen displays. Anomie x (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The template may need to be changed slightly, see here. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-1em>Talk Contribs Edits 11:55, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit count in the userpage
Can you move the edit count in your user page to the bottom, so the page isn't glitched? — Naista2002  ♦   14:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

PS Vita Edition already released
Hi Goandgoo! Minecraft: PlayStation Vita Edition has already been released on October 14 in North America and October 15 in Europe. I don't know why nobody has updated the main page of MineCraft Wiki to reflect it by now. As a Minecraft Wiki admin, could you please do it? Thanks! --173.206.36.122 13:23, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello I wanted to get to know some of the administrative users! TheEmeraldGuy (talk) 05:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC) TheEmeraldGuy

Main page revert
Hey Goandgoo, is there a reason you reverted my edits to the main page? 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I sincerely apologise, I must have reverted that edit by mistake when trying to revert something else. Apologies again. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-1em>Talk Contribs Edits 10:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Don't sweat it, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything going on there that I wasn't aware of. =) 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 10:09, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Wiki guardian
What are technical differences between normal admins and Gamepedia wiki guardians? -- Naista2002</b> ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px">Talk Contribs </i> 18:39, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * See here. – LauraFi ·  talk  19:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Notable differences I know include guardian activity logs being sent to curse, and lack of a few rights, notably lack of the  right.
 * Other than that, administrators tend to be promoted by a wiki bureaucrat, while guardians tend to be promoted by curse due to a lack of administrators in general or in an area of the wiki. Refer to gphelp:Wiki Guardian and gphelp:Claim This Wiki. – KnightMiner  (t·c) 19:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Basically guardians have most of the admin tools but are promoted for a specific purpose - for me it was for all the curse videos. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-1em>Talk Contribs Edits 04:59, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

please help linux issues
i would like to post this in hopes that there is a fix...

so i need some help, i am currently running a Hp pavilion with nvidia geforce go 7400 graphics card with linux(ubuntu 12.04) and all was working well until i updated the video card hardward drivers, and it crashed my graphics card....(grrrr) so with a quick renstall of the drivers and my pc is back up and running, however every time i try to play minecraft it works great for 30 sec to a minute, then laggs like crazy until you have to close the game..... please help?--Mrdrscotch (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry I really don't know much about linux and your issue, perhaps ask on the forums or someone else. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-1em>Talk Contribs Edits 05:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)