Talk:Blackstone

Split Blackstone and Polished Blackstone
The Blackstone page currently merges unpolished blackstone, polished blackstone and the chiseled polished blackstone. I think they should be separated because unpolished blackstone is basically the nether equivalent of cobblestone, you can use it in stone tools and for furnaces the same as cobble. And the polished variant of blackstone's page should have polished blackstone and the chiseled variant since they're the nether versions of normal stone since they can make bricks.

The cobble and stone pages are separate so why are these merged? I know the granite, diorite and andesite pages are merged with their respective polished versions, but those are purely decorative, each version of blackstone has so many uses and can be used to craft so many things I think that having them all on one page is too cluttered. Coolguysans777 (talk) 12:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * splitting. So, if we reach a consensus to split, then we will get 4 blackstone-related pages: Blackstone, Polished Blackstone, Polished Blackstone Bricks and Gilded Blackstone. --dr03ramos Piston.gif (talk) Admin wiki[pt] 10:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes! Although maybe gilden blackstone should be merged with normal blackstone? Although that's probably stretching it a little. Four pages sounds good as they correspond sort of with the stone pages Coolguysans777 (talk) 13:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * makes sense, not much else to say. I'd strongly oppose merging gilded blackstone into this page though. -PancakeIdentity (talk) 16:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree. Stone, cobblestone and smooth stone are of different wiki pages. Gilded Blackstone should be treated as a distinct type of ore. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Kevinshu0930 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with


 * splitting polished blackstone and keeping gilded blackstone separate.--Capopanzone (talk | contribs) 18:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)