Talk:Java Edition 1.18 experimental snapshot 3

Video Request

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * Discussion is now moot with the addition of slicedlime's video to the page. BDJP (t 13:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

I would like to request that this video {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQhSuJV4Hzc} be allowed in a video section of the article until Slicedlime posts his video about the snapshot. If the community agrees, the video can be posted per Minecraft Wiki:Wiki rules/Video policy since the video is from a creator not directly allowed unless the talk page discussion allows it. I feel that it would be fair to allow it until Slicedlimes video releases. --Skipperooo (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * . Better to simply wait for slicedlime’s video than directly advertise your own. BDJP (t 22:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It has been a long time since the snapshot released and no slicedlimes video. I am going back to original community request and will add the video above to the wiki. --Skipperooo (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Pinging other edits so consensus can be reached. ,, , , , , and. I found a better video by MaxStuff, a YouTuber with over 35,000 subs. Since Slicedlime appears to not be posting a video on the update, I say we use MaxStuff's video in a video section UNTIL slicedlime posts a video sometime in the future. We are almost at 2 days since the snapshot was available and no slicedlime video. I think it is time to use MaxStuff's video. --Skipperooo (talk) 18:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * For the record, video in question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWdDiQ1mJuU&t BDJP (t 18:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Saw it alredy Jonjinbutter (talk) ( C ) 18:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also pings do not work. Use their talk page. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 02:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The video is just for audio readers, it is not nessicary, stop talking about unnessicary videos that clearly violate MCW:VIDEO. Humiebeetalk contribs 21:32, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * To be honest, the comes across to me in a bad way. The no part would have been fine, but you said "Clearly violate MCW:VIDEO when in fact, it says "Individual videos can be discussed on the relevant page's talk page".  I know you are "pro" on the MC Wiki, but please be more careful with your words.  Your wording made it sound like that the suggestion violated the thing.  If you really do believe that, then we have a massive problem on our hands.  --Skipperooo (talk) 04:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)