Talk:China Edition

Meaning of certain phrases

 * 1) "One-touch apply" means something like "installing additional content in one touch, without requiring confirmation or reboot", or am I wrong?
 * 2) What does "Virtual handle" mean? --AttemptToCallNil (report bug, view backtrace) 10:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Try using Chinese and translate it, I do know Chinese. Skylord wars (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The first one is right. And "Virtual handle" means "Virtual Controller".-- Ff98sha (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

language
I wonder if I can swich it to english. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.172.3.56 (talk) at 00:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC). Please sign your posts with

Move page
I believe the page China Version seems to make more sense since Minecraft: China Version is not even an official name. Skylord wars (talk) 01:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC) Skylord wars (talk) 01:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * . Another reason for this would be consistency with other edition articles, like Java Edition and Bedrock Edition.--Orange Glazed Terracotta.png Madminecrafter12 T • C 01:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I have another name proposal."Minecraft China". Minecraft: China Version was never used before except for the wiki. But the word Minecraft China is commonly used. I will move this page as soon as possible. Any disagreements? Skylord wars (talk) 11:20, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

How about "Minecraft: 我的世界" or the direct translation which would be "Minecraft: My World"?14.201.60.87 09:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * This is the English Wiki, not the Chinese Wiki. Also the translation seems to be weird. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 09:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Features
Could you add the features exclusive to this version to the wiki, or just on this page? 24.13.23.236 23:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Just on this page is enough and is the current status. There's no big difference like a block just works totally different from normal Minecraft, so just on this page. -- LakeJasonFace.png Lakejason0  (Talk • Contribs) 00:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Dispute over mention of censorship in lead section

 * (1) I added a mention of Minecraft China’s text censorship to the lead section, as well as a a short description of NetEase.


 * (2) reverted the edit as “superfluous information.”


 * (3) I reaffirmed my change (this time without the description of NetEase) because the bit about censorship “succinctly explains why Minecraft China even exists.”


 * (4) again reverted the edit as “still superfluous” without offering any further explanation.

This is a request for community consensus regarding the content. Should the lead section include a mention of Minecraft China’s censorship? 65.121.56.30 02:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It is already mentioned which is maybe why BDJP reverted your edit as superfluous. The Great Spring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 02:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, Minecraft wiki’s style guide does not mention lead sections, however, Wikipedia’s style guide says that the lead should include a “summary of its most important contents” (emphasis mine). Articles on the Minecraft Wiki follow this convention, such as the the article Minecraft which repeats information in the lead section even though it is already mentioned in the body of the article. Since the censorship of in-game text is one of the most significant parts of Minecraft China, it should be included in the lead section. 65.121.56.30 02:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia ≠ Minecraft Wiki. BDJP (t 07:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The Minecraft Wiki style guide says “Although Wikipedia already provides a more general style guide, a more specific one is necessary for Minecraft-specific guidelines. As such, only guidelines pertaining to the Minecraft Wiki and its basic formatting rules are included here.” In other words, Minecraft Wiki follows Wikipedia’s style guide except where otherwise noted. Indeed, other articles, such as the article Minecraft (an article similar to Minecraft China follows Wikipedia’s style guide and repeats content from the body in the lead section. 65.121.56.30 15:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I with BDJP's reverts. The Great Spring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 00:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think there should be a "censorship" or "controversy" section on the page if there is a lot of things being censored or otherwise interfered with by the Chinese government. Mojang may not agree if it gets them into hot water.14.201.60.87 09:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * There is no need for a section like that. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 09:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Should the version history(s) get pages
Should the version history(s) get pages (java and/or bedrock)? And as we are talking about more version histories how about MCedu the only other thing to not have version history page? – Unsigned comment added by 165.155.161.45 (talk) at 18:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC). Sign comments with