Talk:Nether Bricks

Merge Proposal
I have suggested this page to be merged with Red Nether Brick. They have the same behavior in most ways, except recipe, no generation, and no slab/stair/fence variations. Right now, the only description for Red Nether Brick is "Red nether bricks are purely decorative. They do not have any slab, stair, or fence variations." I don't think that warrants its own page. It is kind of like how the planks all share one page. Or Stone bricks. -PancakeMan77 (talk) 13:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Tending to support . – Sealbudsman talk/contr 14:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I do but with the caveat that we ought to  until release to really decide: I agree with comments by 131.109.7.222 and AttemptToCallNil below.  I initially wasn't throwing my full weight behind my support, and they put their finger on the reason. –  Sealbudsman talk/contr 14:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * . – LauraFi - talk  15:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * It makes sense to me, considering that Sand and Red Sand are both on one page as well. Besides the crafting recipe, and aesthetics, there is literally no difference between the two nether bricks. I fully support this merge. Superspace (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * If the red nether bricks stay the same as they are in this first snapshot, I support this merge, but I think that this should be postponed until the actual release of 1.10 is out, as there may be a new structure involved with them, which would warrant its own page. 131.109.7.222 14:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak (close to neutral), as the red brick block is not yet released and is more likely to receive major changes that would make merging undesired. Generalizing question: should we implement guidelines to disallow merging articles about upcoming content with articles about released content? --AttemptToCallNil, previously known as GreenStone (report bug, view backtrace) 14:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)