Talk:Compound

Why “Garbage” redirected to here?
Wait… Garbage is technically and chemically not a compound! Why it redirect here? Hence, could anyone help me to contribute to “Garbage”? Hayd Ken Mutthew  Talk  07:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I know that “Garbage” shares the same ID with compound… Then how? Hayd Ken Mutthew   Talk  07:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * There’s even doesn’t have a picture of “Garbage”… Could anyone help me? I don’t know how to rip the garbage texture… Hayd Ken Mutthew   Talk  07:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Seems that you, implented the inventory sprite, but not the enlarged one, as well as item sprite. Could you implent them? Hayden Ken Mutthew   Talk  13:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Lol, a editor added it! Hayden Bob Mutthew   Talk  11:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Split
This article seems to be just a bunch of different items lumped together onto one page, which seems messy and atypical. However, I'm not sure if each individual compound item actually warrants a page for itself. Should this page be split, or not? - User-12316399 (talk) 10:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I've created Salt for the time being as a proof of concept. - User-12316399 (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * . Some articles won’t have enough information to merit their own pages. Plus, not all compounds are used as ingredients for anything. -BDJP (t 13:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * . I agree with BDJP007301. ImakerB (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)


 * . Keep it together on one page, it's easy to read and it provides a good list for me. 86.172.15.195 16:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


 * . The page does cover a lot of items, but most of them have the same properties. Splitting this would mean creating 36 separate pages which have just a few sentences each, with most information being duplicated across the pages of other compounds. The page as it is is a good length (i.e. not too long) imo and it's convenient for readers to have everything listed on one page.--Madminecrafter12 (Talk to me 19:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)