Talk:Head

Lets not have links to it but keep the page and see what happens

...
Is this article necessary yet? It has no content, the block's name hasn't been confirmed, there's only one image, and this could actually be an entity. I think we should create the article once the snapshot is released instead of having a practically blank page about something that hasn't even been released yet. ISQ Talk 22:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No it isn't. I added a delete tag but someone removed it without any discussion. --Moxxy 03:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure if the page was going, which was why I edited it. It could be renamed for now? No idea. We'd have to wait over a week to know much more, unless they go tweet crazy, since they won't be doing a snapshot this week. --MegaScience 03:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Which is why we should discourage making pages like this until we have information. Right now we have a picture, no comments, no information, just a single picture. I bet there's already a youtube video out there somewhere where someone is citing this page for "Mob heads are coming out next patch!". --Moxxy 04:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tg9prHFwLVQ For ****s sakes... --Moxxy 04:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * LOL, of course there would be, but it's pretty much a no-brainer that this is going to be a new feature. The question's just what it'll be called. There's no problem renaming a page anyways. --M0rphzone 04:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The page was renamed. The discussion was before when it was named "Mob heads" making people think that other mobs heads were going to be items. --Moxxy 04:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Even after it has been renamed, the page is still as empty as before. I believe we should delete it and re-create it after the snapshot is released and we have more info on it. ISQ Talk 14:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

No point wasting time. Just leave it. --M0rphzone 05:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)