File talk:ItemslistV110.png

Hey, When you use my picture, please credit me first and not you. Thats the original File: http://minecraft.my-science.info/items.png Please dont take content of other people and change and reupload it. I've Updated it myself now, the new url is http://minecraft.marvk.net/items.png –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marvin (Talk 17:12, 27 September 2010. Please sign your posts with !
 * "Marv I was Unsure who made the original that I updated.

I Found it on a Forum and there was no link to whom made it. Sorry About it." –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Axeblade346 (Talk 20:58, 28 September 2010. Please sign your posts with !
 * I appreciate your understanding ;) –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marvin (Talk 17:55, 1 October 2010. Please sign your posts with !

--- @Eraiya: Please let me have a backlink, this is my file. I have not stolen it from sb, ive made this myself. –The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marvin (Talk 13:33, 31 October 2010. Please sign your posts with !

Point
I'm sorry, I don't want to sound like an asshole, but I don't quite see why we need this. We have mine, which is tidier and more appealing to the eye. It's hard to see the icon at such a small size, it's very untidy, and the font isn't the best either. Again, sorry if it sounds a bit "yours sucks, mine is better", I don't mean it like that. --Trojam 22:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I use it often like this. Maybe, thats a reason to keep this file. --Marvin 00:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Ah, that's nice. Alright, now I see a point, thanks. xP --Trojam 10:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

The Link
Whats your problem with the Link? --Marvin 18:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's generally frowned upon to leave a URL on an image for an article, especially the larger one you've now put on. While I and the readers here appreciate that it is your image, may I suggest that instead of putting the URL on the image, it should go on the image page along with full credits? I'll do that now, that way when people click the image, they'll see your name and URL as the author. --Gnu32 19:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. In the meantime, I recommend you revert to or upload a version without the URL. I won't do this as it's been done too many times and I'd like to leave the decision to you. --Gnu32 19:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I kind of agree. Pointless advertising of other people's websites on the Wiki is kind of bad. If you're giving it to the Wiki, you could at least take the ad off. --NeonJ 16:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree with Gnu32 and NeonJ. If you're putting it on the wiki, don't have advertising on it. Ktamkun 17:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't even put this on the wiki. I just know that many ppl use this on their pages or outside the wiki and since i am not able to set a licence like this, i want to have a URL on the file itself. --Marvin 00:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Why are you unable to set such a license? &mdash; fuchsi a n i a  04:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 11:15, 27 September 2010 Thumbnail for version as of 11:15, 27 September 2010 296×670 (70 KB) Marvin (Upload by the originally owner marvk.) Marvin, I hate to point this out to you, but the upload history clearly shows that you uploaded the image with the black background on September 27th, 2010. So saying that you didn't even put this on the wiki... is a bit of a stretch. You have since reuploaded it with changes on 8 occasions. The policy of the wiki is to not allow for advertising, and placing your watermark on the image is advertising. It doesn't change your copyright claim on the image that was established when you uploaded it.
 * @fuchsia - you can't go back and change the licensing after the fact. -- Wynthyst [[Image:User Wynthyst sig icon.png|19px ]] talk  08:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)