Minecraft Dungeons talk:End Vindicator

Mistake
I feel that the end vindicator was created simply due to a glitch. See, the lower layer of a vindicator is seperate from the upper shirt layer. The animators may have accidentally made the lower layer completely white on accident, or to possibly reduce lag. I doubt the devs would make a unique vindicator for just a cutscene that is almost identical to it's implemented counterpart. M3FF1N (talk) 21:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe it is an unused variant that got cut. Maybe putting it in a cutscene is the equivalent of making a statue of the Wildfire in the Flames of The Nether. For now, we can’t assume anything such as something being a mistake. All we know is that it appears in a cutscene. So unless you can get in touch somehow with the developers, it stays as a cutscene mob because that is what we know. Drour1234 (talk), 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I mostly agree, just stating my opinion to see what other people think. I don't like to assume things, I just like to say out loud what I am thinking in talk pages, so that there is no edits or deletes made that are not supposed to be made. M3FF1N (talk) 22:23, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

This is just a vindicator
they rendered the mobs in the cutscene. The vindicator had a render glitch that made the lower layer white and not its default thing

that's an error of texture

transparent white pixels in the texture

they actual render in the video

that's an actual bug

End vindicator/evoker/enchanter... don't actually exist

that's just a normal vindicator without axe


 * If it was an error, Mojang would have fixed it. We do not know what it is, either a cutscene mob or an error. Drour1234 (talk), 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * its an error Endermanmansukh88 (talk) 00:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * If you think it is an error, than report it on the bug tracker. Clearly, Mojang has not “fixed” it, so the mob must either not be a bug, or Mojang just is not aware of it. We do not know what it is, either a cutscene mob or an error. Until we do, we cannot make assumptions. Drour1234 (talk), 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Rendering mistake and I can prove it.
Unlike the End Illager (Unofficial Name), the "End Vindicator" is nothing but a rendering problem with transparency in the texture. The mob in question is just a Vindicator. Vindicator textures have a transparent area at the bottom and top of their jacket that reveals the interior clothing. While rendering it, the program probably had problems rendering the transparency of the texture and by default rendered white.

More evidence to this argument is the fact that after the defeat of the final boss of the Echoing Void DLC, the Vengeful Heart of Ender, the cutscene showing villagers and players finally at peace, we can see some villagers with transparent areas rendered white instead like a cleric for example.

Also I do not think that Mojang really cares about it. They took so long to add the Wildfire for what? If Minecraft Dungeons is in such a state, do you think they care about rendering transparency white? I think not. I understand the concern about it being a new mob, but let's not negate the obvious and evident. I suggest the page is either removed or that it at least explains the possibility of it being a mistake.

Much obliged. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 01:49, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is likely an error. However, rather than deleting all of the information outright. I believe that it should be moved to the trivia section of the regular vindicator page.Drour1234 (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I totally agree with you. We can move it to the trivia section. Much obliged for your amazing suggestion. It was the right thing to do. =D. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I definitely agree with this TBH. It's a very similar situation with the, wherein it is a mob that has so little info on it that it should be a trivia mention on another larger page. Might be useful in getting rid of some of these stub pages that have become ever so prevalent on this wiki. James Haydon (talk) 19:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Exactly. I think the trivia section exists for a reason. It is also easier for people to find all info in one page instead of 4 pages for example. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 20:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Pages with little information could be moved to subsections on other pages.Drour1234 (talk) 12:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)