User talk:User-12316399/Archive 1

Archive 1: The Photography Saga (based on this archive from July 2017; anything from then to January 2019 is likely permanently lost)

Screenshot categories
Why are you removing Category:Screenshots with mods from screenshots taken to demonstrate features of the Aether mod? -- Orthotope talk 09:23, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Because the whole point of those screenshots are to demonstrate a mod, so having mods in them isn't a problem? –ultradude25 ᐸ Talk Contribs 02:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * "Place this category on any files that are using mods, unless they are demonstrating the mod.

Also that this category is part of the screenshot fixing project, and I assume that they are meant to be removing mods from screenshots (however if this is not the case, I do apologise). - MinecraftPhotos4U 22:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

STOP
Please Not Change one You Made Tree Image to SquareMan Images,REALLY IS FAKE!FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OR I CALL YOU A NOOB JohnHOne (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

0.9.0 Pocket Edition Features
Please don't add any features from 0.9.0 to the history tables until they have appeared in a development version. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs Edits 05:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

pocket edition upcoming features
I deleted the pocket edition upcoming features of 0.9.0 because the update is soon and the developers don't have enough time to add those things herobrine3701 –Preceding unsigned comment was added by herobrine3701 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with

Endermen picking up blocks
Re this revert, no. Your edit claims that any newly-added "solid gravity-affected block" will automatically be able to be picked up by Endermen by virtue of it being a "solid gravity-affected block". The actual case is that the current members of "solid gravity-affected block" (which is what, only sand and gravel? And maybe TNT, depending on your definition of "solid"?) just by chance are all on the list of blocks able to be picked up by Endermen. Anomie x (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

In-game description
Please follow the style guide and do not add empty subsections for the console edition. See also my edits. —F‌enhl 11:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Seriously though. If you're going to mass-edit articles, at least get your header spacing right so that I won't have to clean up after you. —F‌enhl 11:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm terrible with spacing, but I'll try - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC).


 * Please leave spaces between the equal signs and the title of a section header. —F‌enhl 11:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Why are you adding these sections? They contain no useful information, and if they should be on the page at all, they certainly shouldn't be their own section. –Matt ᐸ Talk Contribs ⎜ 13:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * It only really seems appropriate to document what it says in-game. - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I could see it possibly working as a small caption under the image in the infobox, but certainly not as a dedicated section in the article. It's not actually useful information. –Matt ᐸ Talk Contribs ⎜ 15:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Seems like a better idea. Or we could position it somewhere else like the bottom of the page? Or possibly a seperate RespectiveBlockOrItem/description page. - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 15:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't see how these sections are at all useful. None of them say anything that isn't already in the article, many are meaningless fluff, and the ones on the armor pages are outright confusing for everyone who isn't playing PE. -- Orthotopetalk 16:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

A lot of the others are as well.But the descriptions are in-game, and I found it appropriate to take note of them on the wiki, especially as most are getting removed over 0.9.0. Possibly we could put it near the bottom? - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 20:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Wait, these are being removed? Why not just add them to the History section then? —F‌enhl 20:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Rotateable blocks
Your rotateable logs photo had quartz and hay besides logs, whereas only logs are expected. That's why I reverted it to a previous edition (so sorry). See also File talk:Rotatedlogblocks.png. –Regards, Naista2002  ᐸ Talk Contribs  11:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

1.8 fences
Can you please remove the Nether fence from File:New Fences.png? --  Naista2002 ᐸ Talk Contribs  14:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I mainly put it there for comparison, but I'll remove it eventually. Wish they would add a nether rock fence gate though... - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Grammar
Hello, and thanks for your edit on Sheep, but please note that this wiki uses American English, not British English and so "centre" must be written as "center", "behaviour" → "behavior", "colour" → "color" etc. Once again, thanks, but keep that in mind. --  Naista2002 ᐸ Talk Contribs  11:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Can someone please help me download forge so I can put mods on minecraft? and explain it step by step.
Ive tried everything and I don't know how to download forge and I really want to have mods like biomes o plenty. - –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Dylanyork1 (talk • contribs) at 07:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC). Please sign your posts with

I can't remember too well, but you have to download the Forge of the specific mod you want to use, run it in your .minecraft folder, then it should create a mods folder which you put mod .jars into. Not entirely sure though - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Signing comments
Please review the documentation of Template:Unsigned; to use it properly, you need to provide the username and timestamp of the unsigned comment – just typing  doesn't work. will add these automatically, but note that it uses the timestamp and author of the last revision of the page; for older comments, you need to get that information from the page history. -- Orthotopetalk 02:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * And you should be substituting these templates (add a suffix  just after { {’s, before the template name). —  Agent Nick the Red37 (talk &middot; contribs) f.k.a. Naista2002 14:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Again, if you want to help sign unsigned comments, please learn to use the template correctly. -- Orthotopetalk 20:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quartz is a mineral, not a rock
You're the one who added quartz to the list of rocks and you also reverted my edit saying quartz is indeed a rock. Wikipedia says it's a mineral and makes up igneous and metamorphic rocks. The list of minerals also includes iron, gold, diamond and coal, so, if we're going to include Quartz to the Rock page, I think we should include all the ores and block forms of minerals (or just remove quartz from there). What do you think? --Mine4017 (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Minecraft ≠ real life. – LauraFi -  talk  22:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I know Minecraft is not real life, but the Block of Quartz article says it's a mineral block, and I don't know of any source calling it a rock or stone. --Mine4017 (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Skeleton
The link to the Herobrine page was the speculative part. White eyes, yes of course. – Sealbudsman talk/contr 02:37, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Ping
Message for you on the community portal – Sealbudsman talk/contr 17:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Stop marking redirects for deletion
We haven't decided what redirects to delete, so stop marking them. There's already potentially loads of links you've broken. –Majr ᐸ Talk Contribs 09:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I check WhatLinksHere on every page before marking them, and the very vast majority have no links whatsoever.. The only links I ever break are on foreign language pages (and why, exactly, would these link to an English redirect?), user pages (if the user cares enough, they can fix it, because editing another user's page is kind of frowned upon) and talk pages. -MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 09:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * WhatLinksHere doesn't take into account external websites. It's not uncommon for external sites to link to a wiki, and up until a recent MW version, opening a redirect would leave the redirect title in the address bar, meaning many external links will be to redirects.
 * Additionally, an unused redirect doesn't mean it isn't useful. People may still wish to search for it. –Majr ᐸ Talk Contribs 10:03, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * In reply to this, just because something has an S at the end doesn't exclude it from being something that a user may search or be linked to. Please stop marking these redirects for deletion. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk Contribs 11:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * They are completely pointless. A link to zombies could easily be replaced with a link to the functionally identical zombies, and chances are people would be more likely to search for "Zombie" than "Zombies" anyway. See Minecraft Wiki:Projects/Redirect cleanup. - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 12:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * There hasn't been a definitive outcome of the proposal yet. –Goandgoo</b> ᐸ <small style="display:inline-block;line-height:1em;vertical-align:-0.4em">Talk Contribs 12:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Unknown version history
Adding unknown history using a comment is not necessary. It makes the history less likely to appear because it will only be seen in the recent changes. Instead, add the version history and set the version to. This will make it visible to readers who potentially know the answer, and it will put the page into Category:Unknown version history. The BlobsPaper.png 03:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

File description headers
Generally, the section should be named "Summary" rather than "description". I have fixed a few of these by looking through your contributions. The BlobsPaper.png 03:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Cobweb.png
Are you intending to fix this? –Majr ᐸ <small style=display:inline-block;line-height:9px;vertical-align:-3px>Talk Contribs 03:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * That's mildly worrying. Hooray for google images though, that should be it sorted. - MinecraftPhotos4U (talk) 08:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Redirects
The purpose of capitalization redirects is to avoid links like. Disambiguation pages should never have links to them, except in dablinks. Therefore, the capitalization redirect is unnecessary and should be deleted. The BlobsPaper.png 14:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)