Minecraft Wiki talk:Issues/Classifying bugs

Feedback
This information is definitely very useful. I will link it from the new template when I swap it out for the old. I have a few improvements: Do you want to keep this page under your user page, or do you think it should be under the "Known Bugs" section of the wiki? I'm fine with either, just not sure what makes more wiki sense. --Mattrition 09:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Great job classifying the bugs in "A Basic Definition". Could you be a bit more explicit in what submitters should and should not submit as a bug? I assume 1. and 2. would make valid bug reports but 3. and 4. would be cause for controversy if they were submitted as a bug report. Other readers may find this less clear though.
 * Under "Severe Bugs", you say that a severe bug could be something that caused unexpected instant death. There are a lot of bogus severe bugs that run with the "I died suddenly! Very annoyed" theme that could have been anything and aren't reproducible. I think you just need to stress that those kind of bugs definitely need to be reproducible (I would say most bug reports should talk about something that happens quite regularly, but doesn't necessarily have to be reproducible).
 * I like your definition on annoyance. But what would you say about an annoyance submission like "There's a "2" in sandstone that I can't unsee". Is that a valid annoyance? There's enough of that level of annoyances in the game to completely clutter a bugs list.