Talk:The End/Archive 1

Released Image Discussion Links
The discussion of information relating to the screenshot of the ender can be found on this talk page, and the following talk pages. Please check these for similar discussions relating to the released image:

Talk:Ender Sand

Talk:Obsidian Tower

Typo?
raqreqentba is ROT13 "enderdragon", not "enderdragons". FelixGriffin 03:28, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

New Block?
That doesn't appear to be a new block, just obsidian towers.
 * Yeah I didn't get what they meant either. I think they were talking about the sky. So I reworded the image note. --HexZyle 02:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to speculate here, but that really, really looks like Sand, Obsidian, and Bedrock. It seems a bit too soon to say they they are new blocks... Verhalthur (talk)(contribs) 03:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Obsidian, yes. The sky does look like pixelated bedrock. However, the sand block is obviously different. (assuming that notch never uses texture packs) It looks veiny and strangely lumpy, like some creepy alien bone from a sci-fi game. --HexZyle 04:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Red_link is why redlinks like that shouldn't be removed (i stuffed up the link to wikipedia in my edit summary) --HexZyle 04:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * ....It just looks like sand to me.... Electrk 05:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking at the brightened version of the image, the "sand" is definitely a new block. It matches up with the white, rough texture shown below the unbroken air portal block's texture in the terrain.png file. I won't bother to change that myself, as someone else will probably dispute it. ~Guest, 1:54 AM EST. 8 Oct.
 * Downloaded 1.9p3 terrain.png and confirmed this. This is definitely NOT sand --HexZyle 06:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am wondering why it's obsidian, though? Perhaps it's just a place holder block for something else not yet added?MrLeonov 07:36, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the obsidian towers are probably there because this is ''the land of rare stuff", you knowSpartachilles 09:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with MrLeonov, its a filler block. Talk:Ender_Sand Check out what I typed out there.. at least thats my theory. --Throex 02:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, throex. I could be wrong, not saying I'm right, but looking at the trivia and knowing a little how notch designs this game, I only suggested that the obsidiantowers we see were only placeholders because "endermen are aspiring builders" and notch limited them to moving certain blocks; they won't be able to pick up and place obsidian after 1.9 is released. MrLeonov 09:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Anyone notice this?
Notice how the "obsidian towers" have these corners on them and cut outs? Reference with arrows pointing at it: http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/File:Untitled.png Now notice, the one of the left is not that questionable, could be nothing, but the one in the middle...those cuts in it look a little odd to me. Not like two block towers stacked next to each other. Its almost like the corner of each block was removed.. Could this be a new style of block? That is not just square but "plus symbol"? Does anyone else think the corners look a bit odd? They are too close for them to be stacked diagonal so that the corners would be touching to create that "missing corner". Is this confusing? I really think there is something there no one else has noticed just because they think they are diagonal.

What most of you will think pattern is from: http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/File:Display.png If you look close the corners.. are nothing like the cobble stone setup.. now what do you think? am i crazy? --Throex 02:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you talking about this:
 * Cross-section of Tower on the Left


 * Cross-section of Tower in the middle


 * That's what I see --HexZyle 05:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The tower on the left, I can see how you see:


 * But the one in the middle, I tried to re-duplicate it in minecraft, this is what I got:
 * http://www.minecraftwiki.net/wiki/File:D2.png
 * Now if you look at both images, I can see the resemblance in the two towers, but the one I created is the same layout you have shown above, but the corner pieces are still not similar, I tried capturing the shot from all angels to make sure it was not just the angle it showed it at. I still say there is something to it. :P --Throex 05:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I dunno. The screenshooter was standing on ground above the base of the Obsidian tower, and has a high resolution (not to mention unknown FOV settings) and that can lead to quite severe distortion --HexZyle 05:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure it's just:

□ □ □       □ □ □ □ □      □ □ □ □ □ □ □      □ □ □ □ □ □ □      □ □ □ □ □ □ □        □ □ □ □ □          □ □ □
 * I can see the obsidian pattern three times on the sides. Father  Toast  15:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

loaders and lorp stroaders
What the hell are these things? And why would they be in the ender?
 * Seconded -- 50.82.40.202 15:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Whaaat? --Captain_Clam 23:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

May I please delete this? I have been researching it for an hour, and I've found nothing. Obviously vamdalism- no link to the tweet. I don't have a twitter (pretty wierd for a 14-year old, eh?) so I cannot ask @jeb. If anyone is willing to do this, please do. I am bad luck. Deal with it. 23:50, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. I am bad luck. Deal with it. 02:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

The Ender Exists in Pre-release 3
When I was closing down my pre-release 3 home hosted server for my brother and I, i noticed it said "Saving Chunks" 3 times, instead of the usual 2. (it was originally only once, until the multiplayer nether was made available in 1.6 or 1.7 or whatever it was. Each "saving chunks" refers to a different map) I was curious, so I started the server again. Sure enough, the server gui reported:

[INFO] Starting minecraft server version Beta 1.9 Prerelease 3 [WARNING] **** NOT ENOUGH RAM! [WARNING] To start the server with more ram, launch it as "java -Xmx1024M -Xms1024M -jar minecraft_server.jar" [INFO] Loading properties [INFO] Starting Minecraft server on *:25565 [INFO] Preparing level "MC9P3 Server" [INFO] Default game type: 0 [INFO] Preparing start region for level 0 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 81% [INFO] Preparing start region for level 1 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 20% [INFO] Preparing start region for level 2 [INFO] Preparing spawn area: 16% [INFO] Done (3996281460ns)! For help, type "help" or "?"

(Each start reigon is the spawn area in each map) --HexZyle 09:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Dimension 1 is the sky dimension. I checked that from the code. Germanyboy 15:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Firstly, when you set nether=false the server properties, reigon 1 stops generating, therefore reigon 1 is the Nether. Secondly, reigon 1 has been generating since 1.6. If sky dimension was generated, there would have been 3 dimensions generating since 1.6, but there isn't there is only 2.




 * Thirdly, the sky dimension doesn't occur in the vanilla minecraft without mods. So go troll somewhere else. --HexZyle 15:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In the game code, nether dimension is -1, normal world is 0, and sky dimension is 1, it's been like that way before "the ender". xPaw 15:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * That contradicts the fact that region 1 stops generating when nether=false. Perhaps the region code for the server and the coding in the class files are different? Or maybe there is a negative mixup there? Please explain. --HexZyle 15:54, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Lets see here. Before 1.6, there was just the overworld. We get region 0 in the server gui. Between 1.6 and 1.8, we get both region 0 and region 1. Nether becomes multiplayer, and the overworld still exists. Sky Dimension is added, but it's buried within the coding, and isn't official. The two most likely candidates for region 0 and 1 are the Overworld and the Nether. Now in 1.9p3, a third region occurs, region 2, just as notch starts talking about and exploring a new dimension, the Ender. Nothing has been heard about the sky dimension for quite some time now. It's pretty obvious from all this that the sky dimension is still inactive in the code, and the new region is the Ender. --HexZyle 15:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I meant that -1 is the nether, 0 the overworld and 1 the sky dimension. In server's code, the world in slot 1 is -1, and world in slot 2 is 1. Because of save-bug, the sky dimension is in same savefile as the overworld is, and the world is same in both dimensions.
 * Well then that resolves it then. What the statement on the page is now is pretty accurate. Since the Sky Dimension is still something in the future, hasn't fully been added into the game yet, and hasn't been mentioned recently, it probably doesn't need mentioning in the trivia, since one can't reach it without mods. --HexZyle 19:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have reason to believe that by using NBTedit on PR3 you can set your region, and that region 2 loads as empty, and makes Sky Dimension biome skyislands when you start generating chunks. Was the sky dimension updated somewhere from 1.7>now? Perhaps it's no longer hidden in the overworld, and the Ender is a forth dimension. It would makes sense, considering the huge amount of change in the adventure update regarding dimensions other than the the overworld and the nether. --gmip 58.106.67.247 13:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * An alternative would be that it's empty with sky dimension biome settings in PR3 as a placeholder (or a hint) for the Ender, and that in PR4 it will be the ender. --gmip 58.106.67.247 13:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, this does seem rather plausable, as I have been spawned in the sky dimension just recently on my PR3 server. Mentioned here. I'll remove the trivia point, because it is no longer 100%. --HexZyle 13:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Looks a lot like the moon
The Ender sand texture and the relatively flat terrain shown in the video reminds me of the surface of the moon. The towers and mobs less so. - Astramentous

The Ender Video?
Could I have a link to the video Notch made of The Ender? 70.246.60.105 04:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Here ☁ Shockman25 ☂ Talk ☁ 04:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Here's the link that Notch tweeted SableDnah 14:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Incorrect name
So there doesn't seem to be any reference to it at all, but Notch's video calls this dimension "the End", not "the Ender", and since he's made slight references to the End before, when talking about how he refuses to change the name of the Endermen, that name seems more likely. BurningDogFace 05:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * "Perhaps the new dimension will be called ender, and will be the home to the mysterious endermen and deadly enderdragons"
 * --cptqwashi
 * Notch said this was "100% Correct". That most likely includes the name. --HexZyle 05:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Not like notch hasn't changed his mind before ;)...  I suspect he was going to call it Ender, but (possibly because of the above mentioned 'slight references') has decided upon simply "The End".   This would make sence as the -er suffix is used to refer to seomeone that lives somewhere.  Southen-er - Northen-er  End-er...  Sable 12:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah but there still is no proof that that "The End" video is actually official. I mean, some people claim that Notch uploaded it on his twitter and then removed it (how you upload videos to twitter i have no idea) but without official references, we can never be sure. --HexZyle 12:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, Notch tweeted a link to the video, the tweet was just this Youtube URL http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ehlpLRrwojo (on the new twitter website tweeting a Youtube URL will show the video within twitter - hence appearing as if its 'uploaded to twitter'). I replied to his (now deleted) tweet
 * The mojnotch youtube account appears to have been around for a while and has references to the whole "the manifesto.ogg on Oscilloscope" incident ;).  But you're right - with that original tweet of Notch's deleted we're missing on official link.  That said - the fact he deleted it is interesting in itself... SableDnah 14:10, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, but the Youtube account is an official reference that mojang uses? Then that's ok then. --HexZyle 14:26, 11 October 2011 (UTC)