Minecraft Dungeons talk:Vulture

one word
proof!? Mousy (talk) 06:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Game files. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 06:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Render
How do we have a render of a mob that is not seen in any way except it’s shadow? OkSteak (talk) 15:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)OkSteak
 * Well Oakar took the model of the Vulture and added a black texture on it, since the Vulture has no texture. Better than some low quality crop from an in-game screenshot. James Haydon (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Don't delete this page
Oreli! this page contains a handful of images though! 105.225.210.237 13:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * You do make a good point and I agree with you. Dour1234 {talk} 8:11, 12, April 2021 (UTC).
 * So then delete the images, this shouldn't be as difficult as it is. Oreli (talk) 20:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay I don't think they should be deleted though, except for the face icon on the mob page, but the others should be kept. That's my only concern with moving this to trivia, I requested Oakar567 to make that render, and I don't want it going to waste. as for the other two, one shows two model, which might not be needed but it show how they look, but the screenshot of them in-game should definitely be kept. James Haydon (talk) 23:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * i've got a couple problems with that outcome. 1. this should not be on the mob page at all. it isn't a mob. it's literally the exact same situation as the obsidian monstrosity. actually, it's even less of a mob because it's never even visible in game and has even less files relating to it. 2. even if it stays on the mob page, why should it have a face at all? if there's no page there should be no face. 3. it's okay for things to go to waste, it might be annoying but that doesn't matter when there's something as trivial and useless as the vulture. Oreli (talk) 03:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)