User talk:User-12316399

Ore to Ores
Hi. You proposed moving ore to ores a few weeks ago. You might want to participate on Talk:Ore about this. I am strongly opposed to it, for the reason I gave in the discussion (all general topic articles are singular: mob, poison, block, ore, etc). But I'd like to know your reasoning. I don't understand why it needs to be renamed to make way for mineral vein as you stated in your proposal. Thanks. Amatulic (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

MC-68129 – Smooth lighting doesn't work properly underwater is fixed
You can remove that from the gallery in the section, Make smooth lighting actually smooth? Humiebeetalk contribs 22:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Regarding "RfC: More admins?"
Could you please discuss there? TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) (Tagalog translation) 00:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

About uploading low-quality image files
Noticing that a great part of images that you has uploaded are blurry and the titles of them are probably incorrect, which seems out of standards and has made troubles for me to sort them out in this page. Here are tips about it.

1. Try to use this template " " well on these pages or move them directly to new pages which have correct titles if you can.

2. Think about reuploading optimized and standardised images instead of extracted screenshots.

3. Delete worse ones, such as [ this] and [ that].

4. Discuss about them in the talk pages with other uploaders.

Please pick them up. Good day :)

Fts ·  @  14:48, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

History restructuring
Appreciate all the work you've been doing on separating technical history, is there any way I could help with that? - Rechner2 19:42, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * One thing that needs done is the reduction of overlinking in such entries (e.g. "this block's numeric ID was" - the linking of "block" is completely unneccessary since it's always done somewhere else in the page). Removing links like that shoukd assist in cleaning up history sections and moving the relevant information. - User-12316399 (talk) 17:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

All information about Locked chest joke removed
Why did you remove all the information and replaced it with a single sentence? It was detaily described and i see no reason of its removal other than it occupied like half of the page. this is the edit Richard01 cze (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Because it already has a page at Minecraft Store and as such there's no need to duplicate it? - User-12316399 (talk) 17:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * My guess is that the information belongs in locked chest; the Easter Eggs article isn't supposed to have detail possible about every Easter Egg. SLScool 15:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)