User talk:Thomanski/Archive 1

Reverting the Bedrock Edition template changes
You removed that there was ports to Xbox One and Nintendo Switch on the Bedrock Template. I didn't mean their legacy console editions; I would have provided a link if I did. I was just saying Bedrock Edition exists on those platforms. I'm going to fix it now, don't undo it.Travelbytrain (talk) 18:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, gotcha. I must admit, I was pretty confused when I first saw the phrase 'Ports to consoles'! Thanks for the explanation though! - Thomanski (talk) 21:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Legacy Console Edition
I notice you reverted my removals of exclusive because "Legacy Console Edition exists". While a few people still play Legacy Console Edition, it is effectively an old version of Minecraft, just like bees did not exist before Bedrock 1.14/Java 1.15. There is a discussion on removing such information; please participate if you want to keep the Legacy Console Edition information. The BlobsPaper.png 04:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

To add to the above, if we were to mention LCE then that would mean we would mention pocket, pi, 3ds, etc, which is really not feasible.  Nixinova  T  C  04:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Template Order
I noticed you keep making edits changing the order of templates at the top of articles. While I really don't care about the order, your current edits are in violation of the style guide which exists to stop people from fighting over the orders. Please either revert your changes to match the style guide, or start a discussion to change the style guide.

I did see you attempt to edit the style guide directly, but this is not something that should be done without discussion. If you think the order should be changed from the one currently described on the style guide, please start a topic on the style guide to change it. Until it is approve, I would ask you to stop changing the template order. – KnightMiner  t/c 03:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Edits to Editions
Ive reverted your changes to Editions as the template does not work when empty parameters are passed (e.g.,  ) and the template is too complex for me to easily fix.  Nixinova  T</b> </b> C</b> </b> 01:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Emoji redirects
Just so you're aware (since you created some of these redirects recently), there's a discussion on the community portal regarding the usefulness of emoji redirects. – Sonicwave talk  03:53, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Removing move/merge/split templates
You did this here: https://minecraft.gamepedia.com/index.php?title=Quartz_Bricks&type=revision&diff=1544854&oldid=1544815

These templates are suggestions and should be discussed, rather than immediately removed. The fact someone (in this case me) added it, and you alone oppose it already shows there's no consensus and as such no action based on 1 person's oppinion should be made, but instead it should be discussed.

I recon the pages got merged without discussion (some editors made the page, others added it to Block of Quartz), but in turn, a split proposal was added.

This is not meant as an angry response (I have it a lot people read my messages with a different than intended emotion) but instead just a note for the future.

Thank you for your activity on the wiki, it's appreciated. FVbico (talk) 20:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry about any inconvenience, I can get pretty worked up about these things sometimes. Thanks for the heads up — Thomanski | t | c | 21:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)