Talk:Herobrine/Archive 4

'''Note: Speculation regarding Herobrine will be deleted. So don't waste your time.'''

Herobrine player
A while back, i was using SPC and i decided to wear the skin the player named Herobrine was wearing, and it turned out to be, in effect, the classic Herobrine skin. Could someone check this? It might be good to add to the page.

--174.118.148.247 12:05, 2 June 2012‎ (UTC)

A few things to clear up...
Herobrine. We all know the legends. But I want fact. I would like someone to test the totem myth/'theory'

Also, could this myth, or, for those of you who believe this 'theory of totem summoning', 'theory', could it please at least be mentioned? (on main page, that is) also, about the image, the person who suggested that Minecraft Alpha v 1.0.16_02 is a test version, is it possible, neigh probable thate Herobrine is a 'test version NPC'? Maybe all those not-so-true 'sightings' were in fact bugged games? Or, as someone said 'there is no coding for herobrine ever existing, what if it was hidden, or, to quote some unknown person: 'It was said by some people that Herobrine is a real user ingame. He was said to hack into others singleplayer worlds and cause chaos and mayhem. So, if this is true, then we shouldn't be too scared of him. He is just a hacker in your world.'. Is this true? I know that apparently there is a user called 'herobrine'. I'm not speculating, merely suggesting. Thanks if you read my long huge wall of text. Jackamole 13:38, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Jackamole
 * that is a mod. --Kizzycocoa 15:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

'Under the command'?
The actual line in the patch says "Removed all ghost entities under the command of Lord Herobrine". I do believe the intended meaning of this was that "all ghost entities under the command of Lord Herobrine" were removed, as extension to the running gag of removing Herobrine himself, not that anything was removed "as commanded by Lord Herobrine", as the current article's wording seems to indicate.

--Nyerguds 14:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * you know, I never really thought of that. it's really open to interpretation. I'll go replace it. --Kizzycocoa 12:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)