User talk:Itouchmasterpro

Thank you! I'm new, but fortunately I have administration experience from other wikis.

Let's make this project a success!

Haha. Good luck :) Kingpowl~ 20:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It will be difficult but we will triumph;-) Itouchmasterpro 20:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Did you see this? By the way, gears turn and each frame is different. Also, you don't need to give me Indev, I already have it. Somebody500 (有人500) 16:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Do not rely on texture in-game! This is precisely the problem. Itouchmasterpro 17:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Dark Oak Wood Planks?! I got confused.
Dark Oak Wood Planks?! If possible,See Wood Article,as it is called Roofed Oak Wood (causes me to confused so i edited the Wood planks article). Can you fix the Wood article? --SuperMarioBros99thx XDGaleDark 11:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Mojang changed the name of the wood in the pre release 1.7. —  Itouchmasterpro  d  c 11:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Next snapshot
Hi, I saw that you reverted my change on the upcoming features page. I believe that it is better if it says the week number, and not "next week". Previously we have tried to avoid mentioning when something is being released in comparison in with the current date, for example "next Friday" and I believe that this is such a case. I also know that the week system isn't well known through out the world, but I still think it's the best. --Saanoth (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem! —  Itouchmasterpro  d  c 20:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Acacias in MCPE 0.9
I'm wondering why your deleting 'Acacias in MCPE 0.9.0', because tommo said that he'd add all biomes (minus extreme+ jungle and roofed) so that means he'd add Savannas so he'd add acacias

Acacias in MCPE 0.9
I'm wondering why your deleting 'Acacias in MCPE 0.9.0', because tommo said that he'd add all biomes (minus extreme+ jungle and roofed) so that means he'd add Savannas so he'd add acacias --Tyevskyo (talk) 13:48, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Links to Bug Reports under 'Fixes' Sections
Hi! I noticed there were two 'Fixes' sections (1.7.5's and 1.7.2's) where you had reverted some of the changes. About the 2 fixes listed in 1.7.2, I see that the tracker says they affect snapshot versions, and so I interpreted that as why you deleted them, and that's fair. I put them back because despite not having been marked that way on the tracker, they had affected 1.6.4. I've started trying to put a reasonable amount of effort on my own part into determining where a bug was fixed, due to the tracker not having all-that-accurate information sometimes. For instance a bug was fixed in 06a and the fact wasn't noticed until 11b, so it was marked as fixed in 11b. So I generally list that bug under 06a, the 'Fix Version' being misleading. Or in this case, the 'Affects Version' was misleading. Just so you see where I'm coming from.

But I don't understand the deletion of the 6 bug fixes from 1.7.5. I'm open to the possibility that there is some guideline about listing bug fixes that I'm missing. – Sealbudsman (Aaron) (talk) – 19:41, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I moved them to the 1.7.4 page since 1.7.5 has only 3 bug fixes, I didn't delete them. —  Itouchmasterpro  d  c 20:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, I completely missed that. My bad. – Sealbudsman (Aaron) (talk) – 21:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)