User talk:BarracudaATA

Nice work!
Thanks for drastically improving the way the NBT structures are done! I had tried to make templates to support entire trees but I couldn't get around the limiting template syntax I found on Wikipedia - I suppose the bulleted lists are just fine now with Ultradude's trees and your icons (my plan would have made things messier). I really appreciate you taking the time to help, the pages are looking far better than when I first found/created them. The only minor details I see wrong are that the List and String icons look too similar and that it's not possible to tell when a tag is named "" versus having no name. I don't think the problems are worth fixing though because everything is much clearer and neater than it was before anyway, and tooltips, descriptions, and common sense fix them anyway. Thanks!  LB ( T 22:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, after seeing that Ultradude did this nice treeview stylesheet, I was inspired to fix the messy markup as well. :)
 * The difference between the string and list icon is very small indeed, but I couldn't find better choices from the icon set I used, at least not with the document icon in the background. Maybe I can customize it later for better distinction.
 * And I played around a lot whether the template should display empty name strings or not and came to the conclusion that it's the best to display nothing. Double quotation marks alone as a placeholder just look weird and other placeholders like (empty) seem too long and confusing IMHO. --Barracuda 23:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The treeview is copied from wikipedia, I just changed it a bit to work here. It certainly looks a lot nicer. The only thing that bugs me is they way we've had to do those additional field areas; don't know how to display it better though. –ultradude25 (T&#124;C) at 23:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You mean those extra fields for mobs, for example? Well... can't think of a better solution right now. --Barracuda 16:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Well the only thing I can think of is to do something like this: (or without the line connecting on the left)
 * SkeletonFace.png Additional fields for Mobs:


 *  : Amount of health the entity has. A value of 1 is half a heart.
 * : Number of ticks the mob's "invincibility shield" lasts after the mob was last struck.
 * : Number of ticks the mob turns red for after being hit.
 * : Number of ticks the mob has been dead for. Controls death animations.
 * : The list of potion effects on this mob. May not exist.
 * A potion effect
 * : The effect ID.
 * : The potion effect level. 0 is level 1.
 * : The number of ticks before the effect wears off.


 * It results in a blank li tag, but it's the only way to add classes/styling to a wikitext list. –ultradude25 (T&#124;C) at 17:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think the current way is fine - the tags don't look just 'out there'. It's certainly difficult to represent realistically, but it looks nice and it gets the idea across.  LB ( T 03:31, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

.gif Zombie
Deutsch: (?) Könntest du ein .gif von den 2 Zombies machen? Can you do a .gif of the zombies? iLeon (Disk) 23:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Du meinst von dem neuen Villager-Zombie in der neusten Snapshot? --Barracuda 11:32, 10 August 2012 (UTC)