User talk:105.226.31.202

I hate this wiki!!!! I wish that fandom was responsible!!!! 105.226.31.202 18:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me
Excuse me no offense, but please do not revert a reverting edit, you're not the only "vandal fighter", so don't blame if someone gets it first. It's not quite good faith. We're working to improve this wiki, not only taking down the vandals. So if someone gets it first, just let it be, and then no one will warn you again. Now you can take care of those vandals, but please do not do it again. ♦ ♦ (𝓣𝓪𝓵𝓴 ''' 11:19, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * AttemptToCallNil! Help me! 105.226.31.202 11:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm only saying, a vandal fighter is good, but the rules still applies. Please change this habit, and people will not warn you again. It's an advice. ♦ NexaForX ♦ (𝓣𝓪𝓵𝓴 ''' 11:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Do I need to undo it or change the habit? 105.226.31.202 11:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You can revert a vandal, but if someone gets it first, let it be, do not revert their revert without a good reason. ♦ NexaForX ♦ (𝓣𝓪𝓵𝓴 ''' 12:01, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You can take care of vandalism now because I am slowly dying. 105.226.31.202 10:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Untitled
I haven't edited yesterday.... I almost fell like I was dying... 105.226.31.202 06:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop making edits with the purpose of gaming the system, as you did at User talk:Spectrogram. Secondly, do not remove talk page comments that are not yours. BDJP (t 18:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * But that talk page was made by the vandal called 3.22.71.33! 105.226.31.202 18:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Just because the talk page was created by the IP who you believe to be engaging in vandalistic edits doesn't mean that it was vandalism. The edit was of someone simply welcoming someone else to the wiki. The user in question, Spectrogram, was OK with the talk page being created because the user was reverting your edits marking the page for deletion. BDJP (t 18:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)