Talk:Cobblestone

Until+from 1.17
There's a brewing stand recipe for "upcoming 1.17" and one for "until 1.17". They don't differ at all. I would remove that, but I can't figure out how to actually do that, apparently it's something with Lua scripts that I can't find. And even if they should actually differ, then it should at least be "until 1.16.4". Can someone please change one of these things? Fabian42 (talk) 07:37, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Also furnace, axe, hoe, pickaxe, shovel and sword. Fabian42 (talk) 07:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you look at their separate pages, you see why; one recipe is "blackstone or cobblestone", while the other is "any stone-tier" (which includes cobbled deepslate). The module just needs to be modified to still show the cycling options in crafting usage, and not just the original crafting. Dhranios (talk) (Join the wiki videos project!) 07:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

So, was this one of the first three blocks?
The only thing really giving the claim to being cobblestone is its very similar texture. Its position in terrain.png and its numeric ID all point to it being stone instead. Shouldn't stone be considered one of the first three, and cobblestone a block introduced a bit later with a texture based off of stone's first? - User-12316399 (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Boldly renaming all cases of this to Stone instead and pushing Cobblestone's history forward - all in-game evidence points to it. - User-12316399 (talk) 10:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The grammar problem
In the history section, there is a paragraph that (might) wrong at grammar: So I tried to fix it: At the first attempt, it's was: But this has been reverted by AD OffKilter because: "original plural was more correct". At the second attempt, it's was: But this has been reverted by Amatulic because: "that was incorrect grammar (wrong infinitive verb form)". At this time, i'm so confused. So who is correct? Brain180 "click here to talk" 16:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Cobblestone is now used to craft cobblestone slabs and no longer crafts stone slabs.
 * Cobblestone is now used to craft cobblestone slabs and no longer craft stone slabs.
 * Cobblestone is now used to crafts cobblestone slabs and no longer crafts stone slabs.


 * None of them were correct. I just put them in separate sentences. BDJP (t 16:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * My interpretation at the time, was to fix the verb so that the two parts of the sentence effectively read as: "Cobblestone is now used to craft cobblestone slabs" and "Cobblestone no longer crafts stone slabs". And so I kept the single sentence form but changed the verb to fit that. Another way to do it might have been "Cobblestone is now used to craft cobblestone slabs and is no longer used to craft stone slabs. But of course, splitting into two sentences also removes all ambiguity. - AD OffKilter (talk) 18:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)