Minecraft Dungeons talk:Jack o' Lantern

Can we delete this page
TheGreatSpring (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Reason? There's proof this existed. FVbico (talk) 09:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Look at Humiebee's reason TheGreatSpring (talk) 09:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it could be faked, but that's the case for most things. I suggest looking through everything from dungeons online, see if anything more can be found; if not, then deletion can be discussed. Assume good faith. FVbico (talk) 09:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yea exactly, this might be in the gamer files or was in the files and its not a myth after all. James Haydon (talk) 02:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I am now about this decision TheGreatSpring (talk) 02:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * This is a known unused mob that exists in the game files. It’s not like it’s ever been officially mentioned, but its model and texture have been independently discovered by several different sources. This can be found through a simple google search. |[1] |[2] |[3] I can personally vouch for Nanikos, the third source, as they have prematurely leaked DLC assets several times now and are consistently credible (and were, to my knowledge, the first to discover the JOLT). Alas, that’s the most we’re gonna get in the way of a citation (unless we somehow cite the game files directly...?), but the mob does in fact exist; this is verifiably true. -70.163.162.115 21:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * They all have the same kind of design feature, like the leaf on top and the size of the Pumpkin Head. Only thing is, none of them are official Dungeons accounts, maybe someone should ask the official account on twitter (@dungeonsgame) if it existed or not. James Haydon (talk) 22:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Anyone can just go into the files and see the textures for themselves. Since when did we need unused features to be officially addressed, when anyone who has the game on PC can independently verify if they so desire? -70.163.162.115 06:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Because it helps inform other players on what was planned. And also there are some videos at the bottom of the page and some web-page links about it, so it starting to seem actually legitimate. James Haydon (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What I meant was, has every single feature on the Vanilla “Unused features” articles been officially addressed by a Mojang employee? -192.119.164.40 22:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yea that is why i was asking for someone to tweet at the official dungeons account in order to get an official statement. James Haydon (talk) 00:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)