User talk:TheesexiesTman

Images
Hi, I'm just writing to let you know that on MediaWiki (the wiki engine that MinecraftWiki is based on), there is a kind of caching applied on images, so that if you upload a new version, you won't see the results before a few minutes. I guess that's what made you upload your horse saddle several times in a row ^^ --Jimeowan 08:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank You Theesexiestman 21:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Irregular
If Neutral is the name used by Mojang. Then Neutral is the name used on the wiki. That is one of the most basic rules. It's not about whether or not you like that name. --Ecksearoh 15:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I will concede the point if you care enough to find a quote about either the group (during a time when Endermen were present) or Endermen being neutral. Please act like an adult and stop attempting to make an edit war. I have talked to an administrator on the matter and he didn't mind, just thought that the word sounded a bit strange. Theesexiestman 01:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I realize this happened a month ago, but I think you should have first searched up the instances of "neutral" "irregular". Maybe that would have prevented this from occurring. (and btw, I know Ecksearoh is pretty stubborn and edits a bit extremely cause I've encountered him on this wiki recently.) - Asterick6 09:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

On deleting previous info
You posted this about a month ago, but I want to comment on this. This is my stance and belief on preserving the previous info and history:

I agree with Ultradude, but I also want to say that an editor should not remove comments/words/work done by other people if the words don't violate the wiki rules (spam/etc). It is common courtesy and wiki "etiquette" to leave the previous discussions alone and let the bots archive them after some time has passed. So you don't need to delete them because they'll be archived into the archive sub-pages of that page. A comparison would be: you don't throw away people's belongings just because they aren't there; and what makes you think you have the right to remove their words? (Note: this is just something to think about, not a personal attack).

Also, by preserving previous discussions, comments, words as archives; and not deleting them, allows anyone (user or IP) to follow the course of whatever happened in order to understand whatever the topic's about. They can just read the info like a forum thread to be informed on things or to understand why the editors edited or did what they did or asked. And as Ultradude said, this helps reduce the number of questions asked by people, and retains the info for documentation. See since Ultradude didn't delete this previous discussion, I was able to see it and let you know more about it and why info should never be deleted, but can be archived (unless spam, violates rules, etc. -it's all common sense.) (Sorry if this seems a bit "creepy". I just saw this when I was talking to Ultradude). You can read my other comments on what I feel on History, content deleting, citing, etc. and comment on them if you wish. - Asterick6 09:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

btw this is Quatroking's stance on this: I see the talk pages as a sort of free grounds, I don't really care a lot about them as long as they discuss the topics related to their articles and as long as the text isn't abusive. --Quatroking -  MCWiki Administrator  20:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC) I don't think we need to remove anything on pages if they are fine and don't violate rules. - Asterick6 09:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)