Talk:Spikes

Deletion tag
Actually, It was referenced 4-5 times (on twitter and forums.) But not confirmed. -- { Fishrock123 } (Talk) 17:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we should probably keep this...
 * Then provide the sources.-Quatroking -  MCWiki Administrator  00:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * In the piston article I already gave link to the another, more certain tweet - http://twitter.com/#!/jeb_/status/78559908211081216

We should keep it so that, when spikes come out, only small changes need to be made.

Picture.
Where did they get the picture? it shouldn't be there unless confirmed --King llama 02:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed. There are also arguments that the incorrectly named Dry Sugar Cane are actually the upcoming spikes. --HexZyle 08:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk page: Talk:Dry Sugar Cane

Are the two images at the bottom of the page in the wrong order? (Being pedantic) --HexZyle 04:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, the second one is an edited version of the first. <.< --SN777 Divinus 18:18, July 15 2011 (MT)
 * I meant that Notch posted the dark one first then released the lighter version second. --HexZyle 09:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The lighter version was edited by an user, not Notch, if I'm not totally wrong. -- | TheKax |   Talk   07:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. That makes sense. So Notch posts dark obscured images for his fans to decode? That's neat. --HexZyle 13:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually... Yes. See [this image]. It's a picture also posted by notch. Can you get much more obscure than that? :P | TheKax |   Talk   07:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah i heard that some dude decoded it...i just hadnt seen the original pic....wow. --HexZyle 19:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)