Template talk:Table choice

Had never so I added rarely
if Never is an option rarely should be to, had use for rarely and added it as such Dmitchell94 (talk) 00:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Partially planned
I think there should be a partially planned. There's partial and planned, so why not partiallly planned? ~From Contrapple 02:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Can you give an example of when you would use it? I don't see the point of adding it if it will never be used. – KnightMiner  t/c 03:36, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * In the page mobs, there is a table for which versions have which mobs. It says that ocelots are planned for pocket edition, but according to the reference in planned versions, they are partiallly planned . ~From Contrapple Grid Empty Map.png 14:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * If you look at the mobs article again, you will notice the planned notes were removed as per MCW:Style guide, they should only be on planned versions or Pocket Edition mentioned features until they have appeared in a development version.
 * Also, the specific change you noted is it is unknown if planned, not partially planned. Partially planned would instead imply only half of a feature is planned, aka someplace you would use partially upon release.. – KnightMiner  t/c 15:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * If you can't show future features outside of certain pages, why do we still have a planned? ~From Contrapple Grid Empty Map.png 00:50, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Compatibility with pages that still use it. It has been used in the past for changes from development versions, and is currently used in a few cases as an alternative to the yellow of "partial". – KnightMiner  t/c 01:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)