User talk:73.208.227.101

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to the Minecraft Wiki, as you did at Tree. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you want to experiment, please use our sandbox or your own sandbox. Repeated violations of our rules can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

-BDJP (t 14:39, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to break our rules or make unconstructive edits, as you did at Tree, you may be blocked from editing. -BDJP (t 15:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you break our rules or vandalize the wiki again, as you did at Tree, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -BDJP (t 15:59, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, the warnings are broken, because when you get a warning it pops up on top of the page your on, an never did I see a warning there. I only found out just now because I was banned. Also, how is mentioning there are unimplemented trees vandalistic and disruptive? What rule does that violate. On the structures template, in the unimplemented section it shows the trees I mentioned, so why not in the actual tree page? Why didn't you answer me when I asked in the tree talk page who was removing my edits and why?73.208.227.101 17:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)


 * It simply cannot be added to the article because it is in violation of Rules 2 and 4. In this case, the edits that you were making to the Tree page were disruptive in nature, and the information provided in the edits were basically nonsense that were not suitable for the article. I’ve also deleted the "Unimplemented" section from the "Environment" template as it could very well be speculative in nature. -BDJP (t 17:53, 14 August 2019 (UTC)