Template talk:Infobox command

Is there a reason this isn't Template:Commands infobox, or something in that space? – Sealbudsman talk/contr 20:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think it's because it's only used on the Commands page, so it's only a subpage. A lot of wikis do stuff like this (in fact, Gamepedia seems to encourage it). -Xbony2 (talk) 21:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That sounds reasonable. – Sealbudsman talk/contr 00:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Include op level here?
In Commands, we have a list of op levels; however, it is not included in the infobox. As I do not understand how to write templates, I hope someone can judge if this is worth adding and if possible, add the op level as a variable to this template. liach (talk) 23:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

About PI
, Sorry about the edit warring. But what I want to make clear is:
 * I had read community:Help:Infoboxes and its subpages carefully before I edited this template.
 * You might know that I am the main editor of command pages in this wiki, the creator of the permission level page, and the editor who had determined the contents of this infobox template. I'm clear on the expected behavior of this template and that my edit do not break any pages.
 * I still don't understand why my edits were reverted. Could you explain the reasons in detail so that I know where I am wrong. If I missed some important information, I sincerely apologize to everyone.--Chixvv (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * You need to either define a tag if formatting is different, instead of putting everything inside with parser functions or leave it out as seen here. Removing the "source" value isn't good, because it decides if the "default" or "format" value is used. The source is only not present in the data tag below it, because it uses multiple arguments (cheat, serveronly, singleplayer and others), and not 1. There shouldn't be a placeholder text like "unknown" or "?" to make the page look cleaner. Also removing the meaning of the values e.g. gamemaster removes usefull information. – Magiczocker (talk) 17:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your explanation. But your edit mentioned doesn't work when is "0". This may be a bug of PI.
 * Now I agree that it might be more reasonable not to show "Unknown". But the reason I removed texts e.g. gamemaster had been explained here: because this template is also used for Bedrock Edition, so names exclusive to the Java edition shouldn't be here.--Chixvv (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

MarkusRost (talk) 18:10, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Considering that every command has a permissions level, I think there should be a placeholder to let users known about the missing information. Generally we should be using  like this:
 * However you are right, there seems to be a bug in portable infoboxes resulting in  to use the default text. Which is why we probably should fall back to this:


 * Thanks Markus. I didn't know about the bug and therefor agree with the changes made by Chixvv and MarkusRost. Sorry about the revert. – Magiczocker (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)