User talk:BDJP007301

Happy birthday!
Sorry for not commenting on July 28 but happy birthday! TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) 19:08, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Block duration of Logomansbutcher1138
I was reviewing Category:Requests for unblock and came across your block of User:Logomansbutcher1138. Isn't indef a bit harsh? Aside from the user's dislike of the taxicab distance article I wrote, the main space contributions have been OK. He could be a good editor I think. Would you consider a reduction in the duration? Amatulic (talk) 03:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * They are only blocked from Taxicab distance. TheGreatSpring (talk | contribs) 03:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that in the block log. Thanks. Amatulic (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Minecraft Legends: Pigmadilo
Good evening. I would like to know what criteria from MY design model, I repeat, my design model of character gallery and page format that has been developed and aproved lately, does the page mentioned in the title of this topic meet? A new mob anounced with an official name and description and you dare, I repeat, you dare to simply delete information from the main source of minecraft info? You better have a logical explanation for you actions. The name of the page follows the format minecraft dungeons follows for mobs. Name of the game, 2 dots, mob name. What is the matter? Don't delete the page, change it to whatever criteria you want. Deleting work and research is not only absurd but extremely unpolite and downright wrong. I await response. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Clearly you did not read over MCW:NOTABILITY. I also will not take any passive-aggressive threats. BDJP (t 23:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not threatening you. Also the information should be delivered NOW. As more features are anounced we expand upon it. We don't waste time to add info even if it is little. You know it took me time to make that page. Also how do you expect me to react wen you suddenly delete my work over your absurd policies? Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * It can wait. We did not put info on MCD into its own namespace until a month out from release at the earliest. You can put the information in your own userspace (i.e. "User:Witheremperor2006/Pigmadilo") and it will be moved to the MCL namespace when it is ready. BDJP (t 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I realise that in the momment of frustration my attitude was not the best. I still disagree with that policy, however, you are just doing your job and I believe at the best you can do it. That is a respectable position and I acted wrong. Again I still believe my argument is valid, however my attittude towards you was extremely unpolite and inconvenient to say the least. I apologise for my behavior as you are just a person like me who loves this game and it's communitty. You did not deserve what I put you through. If you could ever forgive me. Again my apologies. Much obliged for your patience and information delivered. Witheremperor2006 (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

"no, this one isn't fine!"
re: reverts on https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/File:Mhdc_pulse_extender.png The version uploaded by Goro488 is missing on crucial redstone dust connecting the two counter/clock parts. -> It isn't fine because it doesn't work without that one piece of RSD. Nilbadimo (talk) 13:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Its updated to the new textures. Everything else is irrelevant unless a newer version is uploaded. BDJP (t 13:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * BTW, isn't it bit over-exaggerated? The Style guide mentions the "vanilla textures", which are things Minecraft ships with. It should be more clarified, that is true, but reverting it just because it uses "older textures" is really not the best reason. --TreeIsLife (talk) 14:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @BDJP007301 - How can the functionality of a redstone circuit not be relevant? Goro488's circuit/image doesn't work. @TreeIsLife - My upload comment was wrong. I'm not using vanilla textures (I think) but Vanillatweaks.net textures for some redstone stuff. @ALL - BTW, where can I suggest to allow such minimal texture mods? Eg. redstone dust looks much more like in schematics. Nilbadimo (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Per MCW:IMAGES, the image must have default textures; any texture modification is not allowed. BDJP (t 14:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe just build the other one but with the official textures. I can do that if you want if I find a tutorial.Witheremperor2006 (talk) 18:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I made a build of this today and can upload an image if need be. If no one else does by the time I get up tomorrow, I'll upload it then. - AD OffKilter (talk) 04:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)