User talk:Jcat02

Category:Un-Active
What is the point of this category? We already have a category for removed features, and there is no such thing as an "Un-Active" feature (or "inactive" as the proper term is), so why create a category that just contains the old, useful category? – KnightMiner  t/c 21:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

I now realize you are right, I was thinking i might categorize unused and removed together, but I guess it's fine, or else unused could go with removed but it is fine for now. and I guess that inactive is really just the same as unused, thanks. Jcat02 (talk) 21:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)