User talk:Tolerabledruid6

Regarding the old Java Edition pages
Please do not add any content to pages that can appear to be speculative in nature. Thanks. -BDJP (t 20:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi there. While I agree some of the content I added was speculative - most of it was actually true. For example, the Creative version of that one 20100133 says that "health was removed, re-enabling creative mode" however this is totally false - creative mode was simply just re-enabled. I'm actually from OmniArchive, which is currently the biggest and most popular Minecraft archiving community (and is also recognised by Mojang - Dinnerbone is even in our Discord server), and I can also prove that claims like "0.0.5a through 0.0.8a don't have proof but almost certainly exist" are probably best for the articles - we 100% think that they exist, but Notch wasn't active on any social media/chat during the times those versions were released. I hope this clear things up, and may I ask which parts may I re-add to the page? The biggest thing I'm concerned about is the "health removed" claim. Tolerabledruid6 (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2019 (UTC)