User talk:Real Not Pure/Signature

Long signature is long. DO NOT WANT --JonTheMon 15:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Number 1 - if you need to say something, put it on my talk where I can be notified. Number two, don't edit my userspace without permission kthxbai.  r  E   a   L   n   O   t   P   u   R   e   18:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You've been told to have a shorter signature already, and I voiced my objection over a month ago. --JonTheMon 19:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no rule against a 5-line signature. The edit window is 26 lines. Still plenty of space to edit. Also, Darkid deleted that post, so I never saw it. If you'd rather I put it on a template, OK then, but apparently that's not allowed.  r  E   a   L   n   O   t   P   u   R   e   19:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I was mistaken in that you were made aware of that. My bad. But now you know the guidelines: can't use templates, keep it under 250 characters. --JonTheMon 19:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that instead of deleting my signature.  r  E   a   L   n   O   t   P   u   R   e   19:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why do you have to have a rainbow in your signature? --JonTheMon 19:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Because I think it looks nicer than plain blue links that change to dark blue when clicked. Is there a problem with that?    20:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It's better, but I'll wait for other input to say how much it might need improving. Btw, why aren't your ' format tags outside your links? --JonTheMon 20:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Down to 2 lines. If you have any other problems, I've lost interest. I find it mildly unbelievable that a single signature causes you so much agony.    21:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Usability and convenience for other users is the reason. --JonTheMon 21:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)