Talk:Tutorials/The third day

3.1
Herobrine was an April Fools joke.

But, for those people who thinks he is 'real', I am 63% sure that the next 'Removed Herobrine' will appear on the next update. Awesomedude1 2 3 21:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * We rest our case now. ajmax8 00:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * We're 6 years later and Mojang still hasn't managed to permanently remove Herobrine, guess he's stubborn ;) - ShelLuser (talk) 06:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

why u no spell right?
If it is at all possible, I will correct the spelling for this entire website, Because I am bored, and I think I might have O.C.D. Grammar will come next, but one thing at a time :) –Preceding unsigned comment was added by Mschooler93 (talk • contribs) at 16:49, 13 November 2011‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with

Problems with the standards
I have seen that this page has lots of "I'm"s and "Well"s and "Obviously"s. It is very bothersome to me, as it does not live up to the quality standards of any Wiki, and I think it should be removed. I modified a section, but right now I am just trying to read all of the tutorials not fix the context type. A wiki usually is just basically specifically telling you things without personality, this page has too much personality and too many references to a person telling the reader, as opposed to a person reading a quality Wiki page. This really bothers me and I think it should be changed. --Diamondmatter 19:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Add a fourth and fifth day tutorial?
I think three days seems a little... too less. Maybe five days seems more recommended. The sun strikes! 18:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Too short
I think there should be a 4th, 5th and 6th day tutorial. 3 is no anuf.--41.77.32.84 17:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Have to disagree here, if we expand this too much then I fear that we risk people to lose interest. However I do agree with you that there are several topics which might be useful to include. PS: also took the liberty to add an extra o to your header ;) - ShelLuser (talk) 06:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Video at the bottom vs. the top?
Note: I cannot rule out the fact that some personal bias is involved here, but I can guarantee that I'll always try to look at things from both sides. My issue: do we really want to start a wiki page with a video? I believe the video should only be complementary, so shown / mentioned at the bottom.

For now I'm going to think this through (also going to look for more reference material) but if I can't find anything to back this up then I'm seriously tempted to move the video to the bottom. - ShelLuser (talk) 06:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)