Minecraft Wiki:Admin noticeboard

= Block requests =


 * , sock of . A revision by 154.27.198.139 says like "Huge thanks to notch and jeb!" and their actions are very similar, disruptive editing on Bedrock Edition 1.17.0 (not vandalism though)Humiebee (talk) 20:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , they did pure vandalism on User:Delibirda.Humiebee (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * alt of . TheGreatSpring (talk) 12:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Huh what are you doing? No! I will not! please! 105.225.45.220 12:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * We know you are, stop pretending to be a new user.Humiebee (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * evading blocks. TheGreatSpring (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , vandalism on Totem of Undying and Woodland Mansion.Humiebee (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * reverting my edits. TheGreatSpring (talk) 11:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

= Protection requests =


 * Semi-protect Vandalism by sockpuppets. Also, can we add Protection requests at the top? TheGreatSpring (talk) 12:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * for both permanent semi-protection on version pages (eg. and . )
 * for protection requests as they are as frequent as block and normal requests. Maybe put block and protection requests in subpages, similar to Wikipedia?Humiebee (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , page is still getting flooded with 1 vandal edit a day so 100% warrents permanent protection.Humiebee (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Too much vandalism.--Olivia Capucine Elisabet (talk) 07:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Indef semi protected it.  Nixinova   T   C   20:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If any registered users vandalise, the admins will protect to directors only. I reached 300 edits! Android 1123581321 (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Move-protect so only admins can move. I reached 200 edits! Android 1123581321 (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , there isn't really a point, most pages are not supposed to be moved like Pig or Minecraft Wiki/editcopy. Also, it should only warrent protection if it ever gets moved disruptively and only users with confirmed accounts can move pages anyways.Humiebee (talk) 12:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * protected to admins only (indefinite), so move-protect to admins only (indefinite). I reached 300 edits! Android 1123581321 (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * is protected to admins only (indefinite) and is NOT protected to admins only (move protection).Humiebee (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Indefinite semi-protection only because it does not appear in any proper articles. The only appearances in mainspace are in subpages of Mods, /DV subpages, and some other non-article pages in article space. (why are they even there when there are other namespaces?) Fadyblok240 (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC); updated 01:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * as other "highly used" template have been unprotected recently.Humiebee (talk) 18:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * keeps getting bombed by multiple disruptive IP addresses, most of the page's recent edits for months are IP edits which end up getting reverted. Blockofnetherite Talk Contributions 18:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Temporany semi-protection vandals keep vandalising Redstone. I reached 300 edits! Android 1123581321 (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

= General requests =

blocked
When you get blocked and it says account creation disabled does that mean you can't have a Minecraft wiki account. it will say some thing like this (anonymous users only, account creation disabled) 73.89.66.98 21:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * It means you cannot create a new account while blocked.  Nixinova   T   C   21:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That setting exists for good reason, though it doesn't work all the time. James Haydon (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, yea that makes sense.Good because I want to create a permanent account eventually. Thanks! bye. 73.89.66.98 01:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

My autopatrol candidates, 5 Jan 2021
I keep running across these users while patrolling article edits, and I think they should have the autopatrol bit enabled: I'd rather not see these users keep appearing in my watchlist when I'm looking for vandal unpatrolled edits. Please give them the autopatrol right. Amatulic (talk) 16:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * - highly active user, mostly maintenance edits, and at the moment seems to be the most experienced user that I keep having to mark edits as patrolled (several dozen in a matter of days), no bad edits that I can see.
 * - most activity is adding interlanguage wiki links to articles, but there's occasional content edits and vandal reversion, all good.
 * - highly prolific file categorizer.
 * - been around a while, constructive, I recall having to revert him a couple of times but no more than I've been reverted myself by others.
 * , although I am not a patroller yet, I see these users in my watchlist often, and granting autopatrol to these users would be very helpful P.S. is female btw Blockofnetherite Talk Contributions 17:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think they called Dlljs a male for a reason, though i am not gonna say it. But i do think that definitely deserves it the most because of their file uploading. James Haydon (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added autopatrol to all of them, I have seen them enough as well to have given them the right without discussing, honestly, but it just never popped into my mind. Dhranios (talk) (Join the wiki videos project!) 19:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

User:JEC6789 and mcw:Patrollers
Can you give the right? JEC6789 seems to be the person who does the most edits in Special:RecentChanges, 95% of which are vandal reverts. at least between 6:00 PM and 1:00 AM (UTC) I don't get why the right was not given to JEC6789 but was given to NineTreyBlud and TheGreatSpring. They mostly use the undo option but briefly, they used popups.Humiebee (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

RevDelete 1 revision on page by
Contains vulgar content and personal attacks on Jeb and MojangHumiebee (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't think that one edit qualifies for RevisionDeletion; it's just one brief and harmless attack that I doubt would qualify as "Extremely vile vandalism" or "Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material." If it were a death threat or something it would be another story, but this is likely not something worth hiding. --Madminecrafter12 (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

My autopatrol candidates, 25 Jan 2021
I nominate these editors to get the autopatrol user right, so I don't have to see them and keep patrolling their edits in my watchlist of unpatrolled edits: Pinging - All of these editors have been editing this wiki for over a year, and I haven't seen any problems with their edits. Amatulic (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * "Due to a bug in the Reverb system, pings currently do not work" is what the talk page guidelines says, so pinging them might not have any effect. James Haydon (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Even if it did, it wouldn't do anything; I already watch this page, as all admins should. Dhranios (talk) (Join the wiki videos project!) 18:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also would also make a good autopatrol considering that they often revert vandalism and sometimes make constructive edits. James Haydon (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure if these 2 should get autopatrol as they are a bit new but
 * Humiebee (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Defintely not Judah since most of their edits are on talk pages and the ones that arent contain speculation. Most of Shaughns edits are on their user space so they arent contributing to the wiki all that well. I would give some time and see if they actually become constructive to the wiki first before giving autopatrol. James Haydon (talk) 18:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 200% agreed with NineTreyBlud, I checked their last 100 edits, and almost all of them were in their own userspace. Dhranios (talk) (Join the wiki videos project!) 10:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see some more non-minor edits from PJronq before I give them autopatrol. Most of there edits seem to be chained minor edits on the same page. Dhranios (talk) (Join the wiki videos project!) 10:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Either way, I strongly support, and  receiving Autopatrol as it is difficult having to patrol all their completely constructive edits and their edits seem to be generally constructive throughout. James Haydon (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Me too, I looked at the contributions of and they are mostly vandal reverts.Humiebee (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay but they haven't been active in a few days, so i think wait on that one. James Haydon (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , changes in Pocket Edition Alpha to v and had been editing actively since June of 2020 (if you include the edits on their IP, shown on their user page).Humiebee (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay but they haven't been active in a few days, so i think wait on that one. James Haydon (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , changes in Pocket Edition Alpha to v and had been editing actively since June of 2020 (if you include the edits on their IP, shown on their user page).Humiebee (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

should be made autopatrol
Most if not all of their edits have been constructive, with the fixing up minecraft dungeons pages and adding Spanish interwiki links to articles. I think that their edits don't need any patrolling considering they're all good faith. James Haydon (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)