User talk:AdiosToreador

I agree that on the rotten flesh and egg article I put in information that was already there. But nowhere in the pumpkin article did it state that the way pistons interact with pumpkins (Besides the link to the auto melon farms)--Minecraftdino 22:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's there. --Moxxy 22:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete tags
There is no need to tag the jp pages. -- Wynthyst  talk  00:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's why I stopped. Bit of a derp moment on my part. Wish I could help you by deleting stuff starting with "z". You have a lot of work ahead of you.--Moxxy 00:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Golems
Couldn't something be said about how golems are created? They're the only mob that is "constructed", as well as the only entities in the game that aren't built in a gui (e.g.; table) of some kind.--Chilangosta 07:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation pages are usually fairly short; they're not meant to be an exhaustive comparison. I don't think it would be unreasonable to have a sentence making it clear that they're constructed by placing blocks in the correct configuration, though. -- Orthotope 08:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Iron Golems and Endermen
I created a topic due to your edit: Talk:Iron_Golem.

I figured you wanted to be a part of it, due to my notion that you are very perfectionist about keeping things the way you think they should be.

Nether Generation in 1.2
Since you're feeling it like "not important enough to appear in the Version History page", where can we report that "The Nether generator isn't using the entire height, making the level 128 to 256 only accessible in Creative Mode" ?

Not a bug, but an important information, sorry.
 * Not a problem, I see you've already added it. It is indeed important info. --Moxxy 18:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

About 1.2.2
Hello. This problem doesn't occurred to you?--MisterSanderson 02:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * No, all my villagers are there. --Moxxy 02:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Did the spamming stop?
I was reading the admin noticeboard and heard that you were getting spammed.Did it stop?

Biomes
Why did you undo my edits? It was only a little observation about how biomes generate after Beta 1.8...Ua 14:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * They grouped like that since they were added in the Halloween update. --Moxxy 14:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I remember that it was different how biomes generate: from the Halloween Update to the Adventure Update I've never seen a desert next to a tundra.Ua 15:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to chip in, I have seen deserts next to tundras. it is rare, but it happens. --Kizzycocoa 15:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Ocelot
Why'd you undo my revision? The other half of the sentence wasn't really needed. Saying that the player entering a portal was enough. --Lolmaster 01:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoops, read it out of context. To me all I saw was "When entering a portal" which seemed incomplete and like you removed it by mistake. You can revert my revert. --Moxxy 01:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. --Lolmaster 01:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Renewable Resource (XP Orbs)
I see what you mean about the note I added (you deemed it a non sequitur, I believe), but I feel like that information is relevant to the gameplay and should be mentioned somewhere. Rather than start an edit war, I'll ask: any ideas on where best to place it?

Oh, and I've noticed your frequent mentions in the history pages. Keep up the good work. -Marksmanship 02:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for taking so long to respond. The reason I removed it is because the page pretty much deals with infinity, it either is or it isn't. Most of what you were talking about was how it extends the period of diamond tools in which case it's still non-renewable. The page isn't meant to talk about extending the use of non-renewable resources, just about what is infinite and what isn't. What you added is relevant to gameplay but is pretty well covered already in the enchanting pages. --Moxxy 06:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Removing others' bug reports
Hi. In removing my bug report about animals randomly fleeing /towards/ the source of the thing that harmed them, I think you are starting to get just a bit too trigger-happy - a trend I have been noticing over the last couple of weeks. (As it says in the reporting guidelines, 'Please do not spontaneously delete an issue report or comment...') Even though I know you don't agree with me that it's a bug, I think it is, and as such I am entitled to draw it to Mojang's attention. Removing the report entirely rather than just downgrading it to an annoyance was definitely not on. Rather than get into an edit war, I'm asking you to put it back again, or reply here so I know you won't just remove it again if I do. 82.69.54.207 14:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Pardon me for interrupting (watchlisted this page waiting for a reply to my own query), but I'm pretty sure the animals were deliberately coded to "flee" in a random direction, rather than explicitly away from the player. I personally think this makes them harder to hit than if they tried running away from me.  Thus, it's a case of individual opinion on whether or not this needs to be improved, making it hard to properly classify this as a bug rather than a note or trivia.  Marksmanship 17:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Village Blueprints
Hey, could you delete the old village blueprints because we have a new one under projects. Minecraft Wiki:Projects/Village Blueprints

Unknown Blake 00:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Mobs
Why did you undo my edit on the "mobs" page. (Just looking for an explanation) Officerpup 20:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, forgot to put the edit description. It's vague whether he's actually adding pandas or if he's just experimenting/messing around. Devs do that stuff all the time like Jeb and his 50ft Spiders. There's even a video out there of all the weird stuff Skyrim developers made that weren't actually made to be put in the game. Hopefully he will be more clear next time it's brought up. --Moxxy 22:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I also undid some useful edits you made. I reverted back to your edit but without the panda comment. --Moxxy 22:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification! Officerpup 15:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Reddit
Do you have an account on Reddit? --Lolmaster 16:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope --Moxxy 18:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Thought I saw an account with your name. --Lolmaster 18:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Smelting
Why did you remove two of the four notes on smelting ores? —kpreid 22:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Because unlike lapis and redstone they normally drop one so smelting isn't a bad idea. Yes you can get more with fortune but that isn't the norm and would require us to add a subnote to a subnote. I really wish I could go back and edit my revision notes, after I realized I didn't put any in I knew you would come here to ask me --Moxxy 23:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

No, Diamond ore sometimes drops more than one diamond, and I'm pretty sure Coal does too — they just don't always drop more than one, like Lapis and Redstone do. In both cases, a Fortune enchanted tool can also cause much higher drops — unless one is against using enchantments or has a chest full of diamonds already, smelting is just not a good idea. —kpreid 00:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Without Fortune or mods, diamond and coal ore always drop exactly one item. -- Orthotope 01:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Huh, OK. I yield to your expertise. I half expected you to have a table of the exact results... (I've thought that perhaps Drops be expanded to cover block drops.) I've re-added the notes but with appropriate phrasing to the actual situation. —kpreid 11:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Fine, fine. ;) -- Orthotope 08:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Ideas
Where do we post our ideas? I designed a item/block for minecraft but I don't know where to put it to get it confirmed. I may design some more too so telling me would be helpful for the rest of my ideas.

I currently have them under User:Unknown Blake/Ideas

Unknown Blake 01:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Books having colored titles, more than 50 pages, etc.
I have created a section on the talk page of Book and Quill, but I'm also posting it here if you prefer to respond here:

A user has repeatedly been removing evidence that books can be edited to contain more than 50 pages, more than 256 characters and 13 lines per page, colored and formatted titles, custom player names (also with colors and formats), etc.

These are all properties which a book in vanilla Minecraft can have, but they require an editor such as NBTedit to be created. A vanilla Minecraft player may encounter books like this in adventure maps, or on multi-player servers, and they will work as my screenshots have shown. Moxxy has insisted, however, that this information should be excluded from the article, simply because a vanilla player cannot create the books, disregarding that they may still encounter them.

If this is a sort of standard the wiki community wishes to set, then fine. But please be consistent about it. The article on signs provides evidence that signs can have colored text, even though this requires mods/programs. The article on snow mentions that snow can actually have varying height, but that this does not occur in singleplayer Minecraft without mods or editing (I myself have encountered varying-height snow on servers in the past, and I was playing vanilla). The article on slabs shows a special doubleslab which requires mods/editing to insert into the world. The map article mentions the zoom level property of maps, which is unused in vanilla. Grass makes prominent the existence of a third grass type, which resembles dead shrubs but cannot be obtained without mods/editing (again, I have witnessed it playing vanilla on servers before). All pages of blocks mention the unused, unobtainable Locked Chest.

Now, do tell me, why is it that this information on books must be removed, when all that other information can stay? If you want this information removed, you ought to remove all of that information as well, to keep this wiki consistent.

Or, you could acknowledge that this information is relevant to vanilla players, because they could very well encounter it themselves and wonder what is going on. Then we'll have people re-adding information in a far less organized and informed manner than I have, with trivia sections such as "sometimes a book can have a colored title on some servers. it is not known why this is" or "some adventure map makers may get famous people, like notch, to write books for their maps". Honestly, I fail to see why that is preferable to what I have contributed. --WolfieMario 03:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Do you have any comments on this? You say there is nothing more to say. Well, I have said it anyways, because I don't understand why you're so convinced that information must be removed, unless of course you also feel all the information I linked should be removed as well... In which case there will probably be more than just you and me involved in this discussion.

And before you say it, I know the doubleslab, grass, and locked chest can be obtained with the /give command in vanilla SMP (and now, with commands in singleplayer). I didn't think of that at first. But all the other things I mentioned cannot be obtained with vanilla server commands, so my point still stands in that regard.

Anyways, nobody said you couldn't reword my contributions to sound less referential to editors and hacking - I'm not objecting to that at all. On the complete removal of the information, however, I have voiced my opinions above. Sorry that I did not post here sooner; I had not thought to check your userpage and see that you are open to discussion on the things you have removed. --WolfieMario 04:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)