Talk:Lush Caves

No azalea trees in Bedrock Edition
I explored a few lush caves in Bedrock Edition creative mode. I have never once seen an azalea tree above a lush cave. For example there is an endlessly huge lush cave near the spawn point with seed 1136481950. Some of it is under a desert, some is under an ocean, some is under a spruce forest. There are azalea bushes inside the cave, but no hanging roots, and no azalea trees above (unless those oak trees aren't oak trees, but then they would have hanging roots below). This is also true for other seeds I've tried.

Is this just a Java Edition thing? Amatulic (talk) 05:26, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I have them, make sure you're up to date... --MetalManiacMc at your service fellow human! (talk) 06:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

In the history, it says Lush caves used to contain calcite.
Im new so sorry if im not doing something right, but in the history section, it says lush caves used to have calcite in development, and attached was minecraft live, and a time stamp. But I Reviewed the footage and there was 0 sign of calcite or geodes. There is clay and doreite, but no calcite, and the only place in minecraft live calcite and tuff are shown is unnamed at the geode part. This might be related to when people thought there was a new white sand. Should this be removed from history? – Unsigned comment added by Netheritedrifter (talk • contribs) at 16:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC). Sign comments with


 * Removed mention of calcite. BDJP (t 16:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * It should have referenced a tweet from LadyAgnes. There never was calcite in development versions, but it appeared in that post, so I am unsure of whether it should be in the history section. However, I can confirm that the "white sand" was actually clay from different teasers, not the calcite vein that appeared in said post. PegasusDust (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2022 (UTC)