Talk:Combat Update

Merge this page.
Merge this page with the far more detailed 1.9 page.

--DigiDuncan (talk) 17:19, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * We've been keeping two types of pages: version pages, where very detailed changelogs are kept, and the named update pages like Combat Update, Bountiful Update, etc which give a general overview of the update with much shallower details, but with a broader perspective, e.g. including official videos, some details about how the name was arrived at, some historically relevant trivia maybe, some development details, etc.
 * The idea is that the version really is a distinct thing from the update.
 * – Sealbudsman (Aaron) SealbudsmanFace.png T/C 17:34, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * per Sealbudsman. -BDJP (t 17:40, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * You're most likely right. Sorry! I was just confused by two articles that I thought meant the same thing. Grid_Command_Block.png DigiDuncan! (talk) 17:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem, it never hurts to take it to the talk page! – Sealbudsman (Aaron) SealbudsmanFace.png T/C 17:49, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * per Sealbudsman, although this is not a vote, right? — Agent NickTheRed37 (talk) 18:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably not a vote, no. – Sealbudsman (Aaron) SealbudsmanFace.png T/C 19:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I highly oppose. I feel this doesn't make a lot of sense, and they should be merged. –Preceding unsigned comment was added by 100.2.216.239 (talk) at 1:17, 03 July 2016 (UTC). Please sign your posts with
 * Wait a sec. You oppose the merge, yet you feel like they need to be merged?! -BDJP (t 02:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you elaborate what doesn't make sense to you? It seems to have made sense to people so far. –  Sealbudsman talk/contr 02:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)