User talk:Majr/Archive 3

Archives
 * October 2010 - December 2010
 * January 2011 - February 2011

Sitck/es
Can you please delete Sitck/es? It's really annoying me. JesusChrist666 22:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)JesusChrist666
 * – ultradude25 ( T at 22:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

More renders?
Could you do some more renders for me? I don't have any for the new blocks added with 1.3. again, in sizes 25x25, 50x50, 200x200 and 400x400.
 * Bed
 * Wooden Halfblock
 * Cobble Halfblock
 * Redstone Delayer

and some stuff that wasn't added in 1.3, but I'm missing.
 * Wheat/Crops
 * Yellow Flower
 * Rod Flower
 * Brown Mushroom
 * Red Mushroom
 * Fire
 * Ladder
 * Minecart Tracks
 * Redstone Wire
 * Sapling
 * Bamboo/Sugar Cane
 * Bottom half of door

Much appreciated!

StoreClock 20:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well these:
 * Wheat/Crops
 * Yellow Flower
 * Rod Flower
 * Brown Mushroom
 * Red Mushroom
 * Fire
 * Ladder
 * Minecart Tracks
 * Redstone Wire
 * Sapling
 * Bamboo/Sugar Cane
 * are just flat sprites, and therefore don't have any renders.
 * The rest are done. – ultradude25 ( T at 05:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Glowstone Render
You might want to take a look at or reupload the image for Glowstone_(Block). It looks like the cache for the Wiki got confused and swapped it with a 32x32 version.

--KaizenNeko 06:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads-up. – ultradude25 ( T at 08:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Stubs
Saw you were cleaning up Seeds, and left the stub tag therein. What constitutes a non-stub page then? The Seeds article looks pretty fleshed out, isn't it? -Wulfenbach (not on fire for once) 09:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The thing is, it doesn't really have that much information in it, it's just spread out. However, it's probably just on the edge of not being a stub. I'd say a few more decent sentences and it'd be good. – ultradude25 ( T at 09:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hrm, I will adopt yoga pose #154B (Polar Bear Reclining Romanesquely) and ponder both the tao of stubness and for some more sentences then. Om. -Wulfenbach (not on fire for once) 10:34, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Upcoming_features and table width
Good evenmorning, U. Quick question as to your change to the tables in the above page: Why 880px as a (hard?) limit? I don't know if it's my browser setting or what, but the tables stretch well off the right of my screen and won't wrap worth beans. Is it the 880px setting then? If so, why that as a width choice? -Wulfenbach (not on fire for once) 12:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The table cells were already set to a hard width setting, however Chrome is retarded and ignores individual cell sizes unless the total table width is specified. The reason they have a set width in the first place is because there are two tables with varying content sizes, and they are meant to be the same size as it looks better. I'll modify the tables so they shrink for people with an absolutely tiny res (under 1080px). – ultradude25 ( T at 12:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)