Template talk:Pipe escape

Fix
I was trying to fix that includeonly tag at the same time. P. S. How did the subst: directive not work? —  Agent Nick the Red37 (talk &middot; contribs) f.k.a. Naista2002 17:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Forget it, it was broken due to that typo in includeonly tag. —  Agent Nick the Red37 (talk &middot; contribs) f.k.a. Naista2002 17:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I doubt this template will ever need to be substituted, as in most cases you can simply use  (though I guess if you want logic to determine additions of tables). If substitution is required, the standard  can be added to allow it. – KnightMiner  (t·c) 17:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I’ve meant the  statement. —  Agent Nick the Red37 (talk &middot; contribs) f.k.a. Naista2002 17:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)