Template talk:Inventory slot

Animated Fire Texture
Hello.

I've just uploaded an animated version of the Fire grid texture, thanks to the new texture format in the Redstone Update (Minecraft 1.5). I embedded it below so you guys can see it.



I was wondering if it would be possible for someone to use my animated fire render as the fire grid image for this template so that we don't have to look at that boring static image of fire.

Thank you for your consideration. —YoshiOG1 19:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The animation would be nice, but the template only uses PNG images, not GIFs, and I'm hesitant to add special-case code. You could turn it into a (non-standard) APNG animated image, though that isn't supported by all browsers. -- Orthotope 01:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * That's OK... Thanks anyway!


 * So I guess I could add it to Fire's gallery instead... —YoshiOG1 19:15, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

I need the source on this page.
Please post the source of this page here. --Tag365 14:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Click the "View source" tab. –ultradude25 ᐸ Talk Contribs 14:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

"Any Wood" values?
Now that we have lua, would it be possible to add "Any Wood X" (X=Logs, Planks, Stairs, Slabs) values that could abstract out those manually-maintained lists? --MentalMouse42 (talk) 23:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * We don't have lua until the update to 1.21, which is meant to happen by the end of November. The lua version of this template already has frame groups, which lets you define a list of frames under an alias. –Matt ᐸ Talk Contribs ⎜ 03:29, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool, so it should be straightforward to do "Any Wood", and suchlike. --MentalMouse42 (talk) 10:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Well I was thinking using values like "Wood" (unless there's conflicts with existing names), but I'm not decided between the two. –Matt ᐸ Talk Contribs ⎜ 11:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not terribly invested in the difference, but ISTM that "Any" is explicitly inclusive, while "Wood", "Wooden Stairs", etc., could be seen as underspecified. --MentalMouse42 (talk) 13:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)